亚马逊河羽流高度分层水域中缺失的阿尔戈浮漂剖面图

Gilles Reverdin, L. Olivier, Cécile Cabanes, Jacqueline Boutin, C. Thouvenin-Masson, J. Vergely, N. Kolodziejczyk, Virginie Thierry, Dmitry Khvorostyanov, Julien Jouanno
{"title":"亚马逊河羽流高度分层水域中缺失的阿尔戈浮漂剖面图","authors":"Gilles Reverdin, L. Olivier, Cécile Cabanes, Jacqueline Boutin, C. Thouvenin-Masson, J. Vergely, N. Kolodziejczyk, Virginie Thierry, Dmitry Khvorostyanov, Julien Jouanno","doi":"10.1175/jtech-d-23-0072.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nIn the western tropical Atlantic close to the Amazon plume, a large loss rate of Argo floats profiles took place, that is instances of profiles which should have happened, but were not transmitted. We find that Apex and Solo floats were not ascending to the surface in the presence of low surface practical salinity, typically on the order of 32.5 or less, due to limitations on the surface buoyancy range for those floats. This results in an overall loss of profiles from these floats on the order of 6% averaged over the year, with a peak of 12% in July. We also find aborted descents/incorrect grounding detections for Arvor/Provor floats when surface salinity is low and the descending float reaches a strong halocline (2.6% of all the profiles in the June to August season). Altogether, the whole Argo set includes a maximum loss rate of roughly 6% in July. We find a pattern of loss which fits the surface salinity seasonal cycle and the occurrence of low surface salinity investigated from a high-resolution daily satellite salinity product in 2010-2021. The agreement is even better when considering surface density instead of surface salinity, the temperature contribution to density inducing a shift in the maximum occurrence of these events by one month compared to the cycle of very low salinity events. Because of changes in the float technology, the loss rate which targets the lowest surface salinities was very large until 2010, with an overall decrease afterwards.","PeriodicalId":507668,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Missing Argo float profiles in highly stratified waters of the Amazon river plume\",\"authors\":\"Gilles Reverdin, L. Olivier, Cécile Cabanes, Jacqueline Boutin, C. Thouvenin-Masson, J. Vergely, N. Kolodziejczyk, Virginie Thierry, Dmitry Khvorostyanov, Julien Jouanno\",\"doi\":\"10.1175/jtech-d-23-0072.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nIn the western tropical Atlantic close to the Amazon plume, a large loss rate of Argo floats profiles took place, that is instances of profiles which should have happened, but were not transmitted. We find that Apex and Solo floats were not ascending to the surface in the presence of low surface practical salinity, typically on the order of 32.5 or less, due to limitations on the surface buoyancy range for those floats. This results in an overall loss of profiles from these floats on the order of 6% averaged over the year, with a peak of 12% in July. We also find aborted descents/incorrect grounding detections for Arvor/Provor floats when surface salinity is low and the descending float reaches a strong halocline (2.6% of all the profiles in the June to August season). Altogether, the whole Argo set includes a maximum loss rate of roughly 6% in July. We find a pattern of loss which fits the surface salinity seasonal cycle and the occurrence of low surface salinity investigated from a high-resolution daily satellite salinity product in 2010-2021. The agreement is even better when considering surface density instead of surface salinity, the temperature contribution to density inducing a shift in the maximum occurrence of these events by one month compared to the cycle of very low salinity events. Because of changes in the float technology, the loss rate which targets the lowest surface salinities was very large until 2010, with an overall decrease afterwards.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507668,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech-d-23-0072.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech-d-23-0072.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在靠近亚马逊羽流的热带大西洋西部,阿尔戈号浮标的剖面图丢失率很高,即本应出现的剖面图却没有传送。我们发现,由于 Apex 和 Solo 浮漂的表面浮力范围有限,在表面实际盐度较低时(通常为 32.5 或更低),这些浮漂没有上升到海面。这导致这些浮筒的总体剖面损失,全年平均约为 6%,7 月份的峰值为 12%。我们还发现 Arvor/Provor 浮漂在表层盐度较低和下降浮漂到达强晕线时,会出现下降中止/接地探测错误的情况(占 6-8 月份所有剖面图的 2.6%)。总之,整个 Argo 数据集在 7 月份的最大损失率约为 6%。我们发现,这种损失模式与地表盐度季节周期和 2010-2021 年高分辨率日卫星盐度产品调查的低地表盐度发生情况相吻合。如果考虑表层密度而不是表层盐度,两者的吻合度会更好,因为温度对密度的影响导致这些事件的最长发生时间比极低盐度事件周期提前了一个月。由于浮漂技术的变化,2010 年之前,针对最低表层盐度的损失率非常大,之后总体上有所下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Missing Argo float profiles in highly stratified waters of the Amazon river plume
In the western tropical Atlantic close to the Amazon plume, a large loss rate of Argo floats profiles took place, that is instances of profiles which should have happened, but were not transmitted. We find that Apex and Solo floats were not ascending to the surface in the presence of low surface practical salinity, typically on the order of 32.5 or less, due to limitations on the surface buoyancy range for those floats. This results in an overall loss of profiles from these floats on the order of 6% averaged over the year, with a peak of 12% in July. We also find aborted descents/incorrect grounding detections for Arvor/Provor floats when surface salinity is low and the descending float reaches a strong halocline (2.6% of all the profiles in the June to August season). Altogether, the whole Argo set includes a maximum loss rate of roughly 6% in July. We find a pattern of loss which fits the surface salinity seasonal cycle and the occurrence of low surface salinity investigated from a high-resolution daily satellite salinity product in 2010-2021. The agreement is even better when considering surface density instead of surface salinity, the temperature contribution to density inducing a shift in the maximum occurrence of these events by one month compared to the cycle of very low salinity events. Because of changes in the float technology, the loss rate which targets the lowest surface salinities was very large until 2010, with an overall decrease afterwards.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信