{"title":"在 Tinder 聊天中调情和眨眼","authors":"Will Gibson","doi":"10.1075/ip.00107.gib","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Existing research across the diverse field(s) of ‘discourse studies’ has started to explore the communicative\n orders and sequential practices surrounding emoji use (Skovholt, Grønning and Kankaanranta\n 2014; Herring and Dainas 2017; Gibson,\n Huang and Yu 2018; Sampietro 2019). However, researchers have not yet\n systematically analysed one of the demonstrable phenomena of emoji, which is their ambiguity as meaning-making devices (Miller et al. 2016; Jaeger et al. 2017). This\n study draws on Conversation Analysis to explore the issue of ambiguity in the use of one particular type of emoji, the wink (e.g.,\n 😉, 🥴, 😜). Drawing on a data corpus of text conversations in Danish and in Spanish by users of the dating app ‘Tinder’, the\n analysis explores the phenomena of ambiguity in relation to the practice of flirting. The paper highlights four possible sources\n of ambiguity: idiosyncratic use, semiotic references, sequential placement, and relationship to ambiguous textual actions. The\n paper ends with reflections on possible future areas of research in the study of emoji and communication.","PeriodicalId":36241,"journal":{"name":"Internet Pragmatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flirting and winking in Tinder chats\",\"authors\":\"Will Gibson\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/ip.00107.gib\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Existing research across the diverse field(s) of ‘discourse studies’ has started to explore the communicative\\n orders and sequential practices surrounding emoji use (Skovholt, Grønning and Kankaanranta\\n 2014; Herring and Dainas 2017; Gibson,\\n Huang and Yu 2018; Sampietro 2019). However, researchers have not yet\\n systematically analysed one of the demonstrable phenomena of emoji, which is their ambiguity as meaning-making devices (Miller et al. 2016; Jaeger et al. 2017). This\\n study draws on Conversation Analysis to explore the issue of ambiguity in the use of one particular type of emoji, the wink (e.g.,\\n 😉, 🥴, 😜). Drawing on a data corpus of text conversations in Danish and in Spanish by users of the dating app ‘Tinder’, the\\n analysis explores the phenomena of ambiguity in relation to the practice of flirting. The paper highlights four possible sources\\n of ambiguity: idiosyncratic use, semiotic references, sequential placement, and relationship to ambiguous textual actions. The\\n paper ends with reflections on possible future areas of research in the study of emoji and communication.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internet Pragmatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internet Pragmatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00107.gib\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00107.gib","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Existing research across the diverse field(s) of ‘discourse studies’ has started to explore the communicative
orders and sequential practices surrounding emoji use (Skovholt, Grønning and Kankaanranta
2014; Herring and Dainas 2017; Gibson,
Huang and Yu 2018; Sampietro 2019). However, researchers have not yet
systematically analysed one of the demonstrable phenomena of emoji, which is their ambiguity as meaning-making devices (Miller et al. 2016; Jaeger et al. 2017). This
study draws on Conversation Analysis to explore the issue of ambiguity in the use of one particular type of emoji, the wink (e.g.,
😉, 🥴, 😜). Drawing on a data corpus of text conversations in Danish and in Spanish by users of the dating app ‘Tinder’, the
analysis explores the phenomena of ambiguity in relation to the practice of flirting. The paper highlights four possible sources
of ambiguity: idiosyncratic use, semiotic references, sequential placement, and relationship to ambiguous textual actions. The
paper ends with reflections on possible future areas of research in the study of emoji and communication.