N. Bangani, C. Muller, K. Dzama, C. Cruywagen, F. Nherera-Chokuda, V. Imbayarwo-Chikosi
{"title":"利用数学模型估算牧草放牧的荷斯坦奶牛和娟姗牛的产奶量和能量利用效率","authors":"N. Bangani, C. Muller, K. Dzama, C. Cruywagen, F. Nherera-Chokuda, V. Imbayarwo-Chikosi","doi":"10.4314/sajas.v53i3.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The efficiency of feed use for milk production is critical for sustainable and profitable pasture-based dairy systems. The aim of this study was to estimate milk production and energy-use efficiencies of pasture-grazed Holstein and Jersey cows. Lactation records of 122 Holstein and 99 Jersey cows varying from parities 1 to 6 that were managed under similar feeding and environmental conditions were collected from 2005 to 2014. Feed intake and nutrient requirements of the cows were calculated using the National Research Council and the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System equations. Holsteins had a higher milk yield/kg dry matter intake (1.36±0.01 vs. 1.27±0.01 kg), whereas Jerseys had higher efficiencies in milk fat (52.4±0.3 vs. 58.4±0.4 g), milk protein (42.7±0.3 vs. 45.1±0.3 g), and energy-corrected milk (1.30±0.01 vs. 1.36±0.01 kg) per kg dry matter intake. Jersey cows also had a higher dry matter intake/kg body weight (3.13±0.02 vs. 3.51±0.02%). During transition and early lactation stages, Holstein and Jersey cows were in negative energy balance for 102.4±2.3 vs. 74.2±2.3 days, with the lowest energy reserves (-53.9 MJ vs. -39.7 MJ) reached at 22.3±0.9 vs. 24.6±0.9 days post-calving, respectively. Compared to Holsteins, Jersey cows used proportionally less net energy intake to produce 100 g milk fat (13.7±0.10 vs. 12.5±0.10), 100 g milk protein (16.7±0.14 vs.16.2±0.15) and a 1-kg energy-corrected milk (5.52±0.04 vs. 5.35±0.04), making them a better breed for pasture-based dairy systems as they possess more production and feed-use efficiency traits, which are desirable in pasture-based production systems.","PeriodicalId":21869,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating milk production and energy-use efficiency of pasture-grazed Holstein and Jersey cows using mathematical models\",\"authors\":\"N. Bangani, C. Muller, K. Dzama, C. Cruywagen, F. Nherera-Chokuda, V. Imbayarwo-Chikosi\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/sajas.v53i3.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The efficiency of feed use for milk production is critical for sustainable and profitable pasture-based dairy systems. The aim of this study was to estimate milk production and energy-use efficiencies of pasture-grazed Holstein and Jersey cows. Lactation records of 122 Holstein and 99 Jersey cows varying from parities 1 to 6 that were managed under similar feeding and environmental conditions were collected from 2005 to 2014. Feed intake and nutrient requirements of the cows were calculated using the National Research Council and the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System equations. Holsteins had a higher milk yield/kg dry matter intake (1.36±0.01 vs. 1.27±0.01 kg), whereas Jerseys had higher efficiencies in milk fat (52.4±0.3 vs. 58.4±0.4 g), milk protein (42.7±0.3 vs. 45.1±0.3 g), and energy-corrected milk (1.30±0.01 vs. 1.36±0.01 kg) per kg dry matter intake. Jersey cows also had a higher dry matter intake/kg body weight (3.13±0.02 vs. 3.51±0.02%). During transition and early lactation stages, Holstein and Jersey cows were in negative energy balance for 102.4±2.3 vs. 74.2±2.3 days, with the lowest energy reserves (-53.9 MJ vs. -39.7 MJ) reached at 22.3±0.9 vs. 24.6±0.9 days post-calving, respectively. Compared to Holsteins, Jersey cows used proportionally less net energy intake to produce 100 g milk fat (13.7±0.10 vs. 12.5±0.10), 100 g milk protein (16.7±0.14 vs.16.2±0.15) and a 1-kg energy-corrected milk (5.52±0.04 vs. 5.35±0.04), making them a better breed for pasture-based dairy systems as they possess more production and feed-use efficiency traits, which are desirable in pasture-based production systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal of Animal Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal of Animal Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v53i3.01\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v53i3.01","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
牛奶生产的饲料利用效率对于可持续发展和盈利的牧场奶牛系统至关重要。本研究旨在估算牧场放牧的荷斯坦奶牛和娟姗牛的产奶量和能量利用效率。从 2005 年到 2014 年,研究人员收集了 122 头荷斯坦奶牛和 99 头娟姗奶牛的泌乳记录,这些奶牛的年龄从 1 到 6 岁不等,在相似的饲养和环境条件下进行管理。使用美国国家研究委员会和康奈尔大学净碳水化合物和蛋白质系统公式计算了奶牛的饲料摄入量和营养需求量。荷斯坦奶牛的产奶量/千克干物质摄入量(1.36±0.01 vs. 1.27±0.01千克)较高,而娟姗奶牛的乳脂(52.4±0.3 vs. 58.4±0.4克)、乳蛋白(42.7±0.3 vs. 45.1±0.3克)和能量校正奶(1.30±0.01 vs. 1.36±0.01千克)/千克干物质摄入量的效率较高。娟姗牛的干物质摄入量/公斤体重(3.13±0.02 vs. 3.51±0.02%)也较高。在过渡阶段和泌乳早期,荷斯坦奶牛和娟珊奶牛分别有 102.4±2.3 天和 74.2±2.3 天处于负能量平衡状态,能量储备最低(-53.9 兆焦比-39.7 兆焦)的时间分别是产后 22.3±0.9 天和 24.6±0.9 天。与荷斯坦牛相比,娟姗牛生产100克乳脂(13.7±0.10 vs. 12.5±0.10)、100克乳蛋白(16.7±0.14 vs. 16.2±0.15)和1千克能量校正奶(5.52±0.04 vs. 5.35±0.04)所需的净能量较少,这使它们成为牧场型奶牛系统的更好品种,因为它们具有更高的生产效率和饲料利用效率,而这正是牧场型生产系统所需要的。
Estimating milk production and energy-use efficiency of pasture-grazed Holstein and Jersey cows using mathematical models
The efficiency of feed use for milk production is critical for sustainable and profitable pasture-based dairy systems. The aim of this study was to estimate milk production and energy-use efficiencies of pasture-grazed Holstein and Jersey cows. Lactation records of 122 Holstein and 99 Jersey cows varying from parities 1 to 6 that were managed under similar feeding and environmental conditions were collected from 2005 to 2014. Feed intake and nutrient requirements of the cows were calculated using the National Research Council and the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System equations. Holsteins had a higher milk yield/kg dry matter intake (1.36±0.01 vs. 1.27±0.01 kg), whereas Jerseys had higher efficiencies in milk fat (52.4±0.3 vs. 58.4±0.4 g), milk protein (42.7±0.3 vs. 45.1±0.3 g), and energy-corrected milk (1.30±0.01 vs. 1.36±0.01 kg) per kg dry matter intake. Jersey cows also had a higher dry matter intake/kg body weight (3.13±0.02 vs. 3.51±0.02%). During transition and early lactation stages, Holstein and Jersey cows were in negative energy balance for 102.4±2.3 vs. 74.2±2.3 days, with the lowest energy reserves (-53.9 MJ vs. -39.7 MJ) reached at 22.3±0.9 vs. 24.6±0.9 days post-calving, respectively. Compared to Holsteins, Jersey cows used proportionally less net energy intake to produce 100 g milk fat (13.7±0.10 vs. 12.5±0.10), 100 g milk protein (16.7±0.14 vs.16.2±0.15) and a 1-kg energy-corrected milk (5.52±0.04 vs. 5.35±0.04), making them a better breed for pasture-based dairy systems as they possess more production and feed-use efficiency traits, which are desirable in pasture-based production systems.
期刊介绍:
The South African Journal of Animal Science is an open access, peer-reviewed journal for
publication of original scientific articles and reviews in the field of animal science. The journal
publishes reports of research dealing with production of farmed animal species (cattle, sheep,
goats, pigs, horses, poultry and ostriches), as well as pertinent aspects of research on aquatic
and wildlife species. Disciplines covered nutrition, genetics, physiology, and production
systems. Systematic research on animal products, behaviour, and welfare are also invited.
Rigorous testing of well-specified hypotheses is expected.