土工格栅嵌入石柱群在单调和循环荷载下的行为

IF 1.8 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
J. T. Shahu, Suresh Kumar, Riya Bhowmik
{"title":"土工格栅嵌入石柱群在单调和循环荷载下的行为","authors":"J. T. Shahu, Suresh Kumar, Riya Bhowmik","doi":"10.1007/s40999-023-00929-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although the efficacy of stone columns as a ground improvement technique for soft soils is well-established, their effectiveness diminishes in very soft soils (<i>q</i><sub>u</sub> &lt; 25 kPa) due to insufficient lateral support. In such situations, encasement with geosynthetics may be beneficial. This paper presents the results of model tests on various types of stone columns (floating and end-bearing) with different diameters (40 mm and 60 mm), both ordinary and geogrid-encased, in very soft clay with varying undrained shear strengths. The tests were conducted under monotonic and cyclic loading conditions in a plane-strain configuration. The study evaluates the impact of key parameters, including column length and diameter, base support conditions, undrained shear strength of clay, and geogrid encasement length, on the performance of improved ground through a total of 28 model tests. The results show that regardless of the soil's undrained shear strength, the encasement of stone columns with geogrids significantly enhances ground performance. Under monotonic loading, this improvement ranges from 22 to 140% depending on the length of geosynthetics encasement and base support conditions. Under incremental cyclic loads, the improvement varies from 25 to 50%. It is also observed that the geogrid encasement's effectiveness significantly increases when it encompasses the entire length of the stone columns, as it extends the lateral bulging zone below the encasement length.</p>","PeriodicalId":50331,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"97 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Behaviour of Geogrid-Encased Group of Stone Columns Under Monotonic and Cyclic Loading\",\"authors\":\"J. T. Shahu, Suresh Kumar, Riya Bhowmik\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40999-023-00929-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Although the efficacy of stone columns as a ground improvement technique for soft soils is well-established, their effectiveness diminishes in very soft soils (<i>q</i><sub>u</sub> &lt; 25 kPa) due to insufficient lateral support. In such situations, encasement with geosynthetics may be beneficial. This paper presents the results of model tests on various types of stone columns (floating and end-bearing) with different diameters (40 mm and 60 mm), both ordinary and geogrid-encased, in very soft clay with varying undrained shear strengths. The tests were conducted under monotonic and cyclic loading conditions in a plane-strain configuration. The study evaluates the impact of key parameters, including column length and diameter, base support conditions, undrained shear strength of clay, and geogrid encasement length, on the performance of improved ground through a total of 28 model tests. The results show that regardless of the soil's undrained shear strength, the encasement of stone columns with geogrids significantly enhances ground performance. Under monotonic loading, this improvement ranges from 22 to 140% depending on the length of geosynthetics encasement and base support conditions. Under incremental cyclic loads, the improvement varies from 25 to 50%. It is also observed that the geogrid encasement's effectiveness significantly increases when it encompasses the entire length of the stone columns, as it extends the lateral bulging zone below the encasement length.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50331,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"volume\":\"97 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-023-00929-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-023-00929-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然石柱作为软土地面改良技术的功效已得到证实,但在极软土(qu < 25 kPa)中,由于侧向支撑力不足,石柱的功效会减弱。在这种情况下,使用土工合成材料进行包裹可能会有所帮助。本文介绍了在具有不同排水剪切强度的极软粘土中对不同直径(40 毫米和 60 毫米)的各种类型石柱(浮动石柱和端承石柱)(包括普通石柱和土工格栅包裹石柱)进行模型试验的结果。试验是在平面应变配置的单调和循环加载条件下进行的。研究通过总共 28 次模型试验,评估了关键参数对改良地基性能的影响,包括支柱长度和直径、基座支撑条件、粘土的排水剪切强度和土工格栅包裹长度。结果表明,无论土壤的排水剪切强度如何,用土工格栅包裹石柱都能显著提高地面性能。在单调荷载条件下,根据土工合成材料包裹长度和基座支撑条件的不同,这种改善幅度从 22% 到 140% 不等。在递增循环荷载下,改善幅度为 25% 至 50%。此外,我们还观察到,当土工格栅包围石柱的整个长度时,其效果会显著提高,因为它将横向隆起区扩展到了包围长度以下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Behaviour of Geogrid-Encased Group of Stone Columns Under Monotonic and Cyclic Loading

Behaviour of Geogrid-Encased Group of Stone Columns Under Monotonic and Cyclic Loading

Although the efficacy of stone columns as a ground improvement technique for soft soils is well-established, their effectiveness diminishes in very soft soils (qu < 25 kPa) due to insufficient lateral support. In such situations, encasement with geosynthetics may be beneficial. This paper presents the results of model tests on various types of stone columns (floating and end-bearing) with different diameters (40 mm and 60 mm), both ordinary and geogrid-encased, in very soft clay with varying undrained shear strengths. The tests were conducted under monotonic and cyclic loading conditions in a plane-strain configuration. The study evaluates the impact of key parameters, including column length and diameter, base support conditions, undrained shear strength of clay, and geogrid encasement length, on the performance of improved ground through a total of 28 model tests. The results show that regardless of the soil's undrained shear strength, the encasement of stone columns with geogrids significantly enhances ground performance. Under monotonic loading, this improvement ranges from 22 to 140% depending on the length of geosynthetics encasement and base support conditions. Under incremental cyclic loads, the improvement varies from 25 to 50%. It is also observed that the geogrid encasement's effectiveness significantly increases when it encompasses the entire length of the stone columns, as it extends the lateral bulging zone below the encasement length.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
83
审稿时长
15 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Civil Engineering, The official publication of Iranian Society of Civil Engineering and Iran University of Science and Technology is devoted to original and interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of civil engineering with similar emphasis on all topics.The journal provides a forum for the International Civil Engineering Community to present and discuss matters of major interest e.g. new developments in civil regulations, The topics are included but are not necessarily restricted to :- Structures- Geotechnics- Transportation- Environment- Earthquakes- Water Resources- Construction Engineering and Management, and New Materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信