日本医生工作方式改革后项目主任对值班时间的看法

Kiyoshi Shikino, Yuji Nishizaki, Kazuya Nagasaki, Hiroyuki Kobayashi, Koshi Kataoka, Taro Shimizu, Yasuharu Tokuda
{"title":"日本医生工作方式改革后项目主任对值班时间的看法","authors":"Kiyoshi Shikino, Yuji Nishizaki, Kazuya Nagasaki, Hiroyuki Kobayashi, Koshi Kataoka, Taro Shimizu, Yasuharu Tokuda","doi":"10.1101/2024.02.09.24302425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In anticipation of Japan's physician work style reforms scheduled for April 2024, which will restrict physicians' overtime duty hours to under 960 (Level A) or 1920 (Level C-1) hours per year, this study evaluates the potential impact on clinical resident physicians' training environments through the lens of residency program directors.\nMethods: A cross-sectional survey was administered to program directors from 701 facilities associated with the 2023 General Medicine-In Training Examination (GM-ITE), capturing responses regarding their planned level of overtime, perceptions of optimal working hours for training efficacy, and items considered as duty hours.\nResults: Out of the 701 facilities, 254 responded (36.2% response rate), with a predominant inclination towards adopting Level A (83.5%). A consensus emerged favoring 40 overtime duty hours per month as optimal, significantly lower than previous suggestions of 60-65 hours per week. The study also delineated the classification of activities as duty hours, with patient procedures and mandatory educational sessions identified as such, while self-improvement was largely not considered duty.\nDiscussion: The findings indicate a substantial shift from previously recommended optimal duty hours towards a more conservative approach. This shift may reflect a proactive adaptation to upcoming regulatory changes and raises questions about the potential impact on the quality of clinical training. The distinction between educational activities and duty hours underscores the need for clarity within the impending work style reforms.","PeriodicalId":501387,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Medical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Program Directors' Perspectives on Duty Hours Following the Physicians' Work Style Reforms in Japan\",\"authors\":\"Kiyoshi Shikino, Yuji Nishizaki, Kazuya Nagasaki, Hiroyuki Kobayashi, Koshi Kataoka, Taro Shimizu, Yasuharu Tokuda\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.02.09.24302425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: In anticipation of Japan's physician work style reforms scheduled for April 2024, which will restrict physicians' overtime duty hours to under 960 (Level A) or 1920 (Level C-1) hours per year, this study evaluates the potential impact on clinical resident physicians' training environments through the lens of residency program directors.\\nMethods: A cross-sectional survey was administered to program directors from 701 facilities associated with the 2023 General Medicine-In Training Examination (GM-ITE), capturing responses regarding their planned level of overtime, perceptions of optimal working hours for training efficacy, and items considered as duty hours.\\nResults: Out of the 701 facilities, 254 responded (36.2% response rate), with a predominant inclination towards adopting Level A (83.5%). A consensus emerged favoring 40 overtime duty hours per month as optimal, significantly lower than previous suggestions of 60-65 hours per week. The study also delineated the classification of activities as duty hours, with patient procedures and mandatory educational sessions identified as such, while self-improvement was largely not considered duty.\\nDiscussion: The findings indicate a substantial shift from previously recommended optimal duty hours towards a more conservative approach. This shift may reflect a proactive adaptation to upcoming regulatory changes and raises questions about the potential impact on the quality of clinical training. The distinction between educational activities and duty hours underscores the need for clarity within the impending work style reforms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Medical Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.09.24302425\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.09.24302425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:日本计划于2024年4月进行医生工作方式改革,将医生每年的加班时间限制在960小时(A级)或1920小时(C-1级)以下,本研究通过住院医师培训项目主任的视角评估了该改革对临床住院医师培训环境的潜在影响:对与 2023 年全科医学培训考试(GM-ITE)相关的 701 家机构的项目主任进行了横向调查,收集了他们对计划加班水平、对培训效果最佳工作时间的看法以及被视为值班时间的项目的答复:结果:在 701 家医疗机构中,有 254 家做出了回复(回复率为 36.2%),主要倾向于采用 A 级(83.5%)。大家一致认为每月 40 个加班时数最合适,大大低于以往每周 60-65 个小时的建议。研究还划分了值班时数的活动类别,其中病人手术和强制性教育课程被确定为值班时数,而自我提高基本上不被视为值班时数:讨论:研究结果表明,以前推荐的最佳值班时间已发生重大转变,转而采用更为保守的方法。这种转变可能反映了对即将到来的监管变化的主动适应,并提出了对临床培训质量的潜在影响问题。教育活动与值班时间之间的区别突出表明,在即将进行的工作方式改革中,有必要明确这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Program Directors' Perspectives on Duty Hours Following the Physicians' Work Style Reforms in Japan
Background: In anticipation of Japan's physician work style reforms scheduled for April 2024, which will restrict physicians' overtime duty hours to under 960 (Level A) or 1920 (Level C-1) hours per year, this study evaluates the potential impact on clinical resident physicians' training environments through the lens of residency program directors. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was administered to program directors from 701 facilities associated with the 2023 General Medicine-In Training Examination (GM-ITE), capturing responses regarding their planned level of overtime, perceptions of optimal working hours for training efficacy, and items considered as duty hours. Results: Out of the 701 facilities, 254 responded (36.2% response rate), with a predominant inclination towards adopting Level A (83.5%). A consensus emerged favoring 40 overtime duty hours per month as optimal, significantly lower than previous suggestions of 60-65 hours per week. The study also delineated the classification of activities as duty hours, with patient procedures and mandatory educational sessions identified as such, while self-improvement was largely not considered duty. Discussion: The findings indicate a substantial shift from previously recommended optimal duty hours towards a more conservative approach. This shift may reflect a proactive adaptation to upcoming regulatory changes and raises questions about the potential impact on the quality of clinical training. The distinction between educational activities and duty hours underscores the need for clarity within the impending work style reforms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信