Sébastien Blein, Virginie Guemas, Ian M. Brooks, Andrew D. Elvidge, Ian A. Renfrew
{"title":"从实地数据估算海冰上阻力系数的不确定性","authors":"Sébastien Blein, Virginie Guemas, Ian M. Brooks, Andrew D. Elvidge, Ian A. Renfrew","doi":"10.1007/s10546-023-00851-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Surface turbulent exchanges play a key role on sea ice dynamics, on ocean and sea ice heat budgets and on the polar atmosphere. Uncertainties in parameterizations of surface turbulent fluxes are mostly held by the transfer coefficients and estimates of those transfer coefficients from field data are required for parameterization development. Measurement errors propagate through the computation of transfer coefficients and contribute to its total error together with the uncertainties in the empirical stability functions used to correct for stability effects. Here we propose a methodology to assess their contributions individually to each coefficient estimate as well as the total drag coefficient uncertainty and we apply this methodology on the example of the SHEBA campaign. We conclude that for most common drag coefficient values (between <span>\\(1.0\\times 10^{-3}\\)</span> and <span>\\(2.5\\times 10^{-3}\\)</span>), the relative total uncertainty ranges from 25 and 50<span>\\(\\%\\)</span>. For stable or unstable conditions with a stability parameter <span>\\(|\\zeta |>1\\)</span> on average, the total uncertainty in the neutral drag coefficient exceeds the neutral drag coefficient value itself, while for <span>\\(|\\zeta |<1\\)</span> the total uncertainty is around 25<span>\\(\\%\\)</span> of the drag coefficient. For closer-to-neutral conditions, this uncertainty is dominated by measurement uncertainties in surface turbulent momentum fluxes which should therefore be the target of efforts in uncertainty reduction. We also propose an objective data-screening procedure for field data, which consists of retaining data for which the relative error on neutral drag coefficient does not exceed a given threshold. This method, in addition to the commonly used flux quality control procedure, allows for a reduction of the drag coefficient dispersion compared to other data-screening methods, which we take as an indication of better dataset quality.\n</p>","PeriodicalId":9153,"journal":{"name":"Boundary-Layer Meteorology","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uncertainties of Drag Coefficient Estimates Above Sea Ice from Field Data\",\"authors\":\"Sébastien Blein, Virginie Guemas, Ian M. Brooks, Andrew D. Elvidge, Ian A. Renfrew\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10546-023-00851-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Surface turbulent exchanges play a key role on sea ice dynamics, on ocean and sea ice heat budgets and on the polar atmosphere. Uncertainties in parameterizations of surface turbulent fluxes are mostly held by the transfer coefficients and estimates of those transfer coefficients from field data are required for parameterization development. Measurement errors propagate through the computation of transfer coefficients and contribute to its total error together with the uncertainties in the empirical stability functions used to correct for stability effects. Here we propose a methodology to assess their contributions individually to each coefficient estimate as well as the total drag coefficient uncertainty and we apply this methodology on the example of the SHEBA campaign. We conclude that for most common drag coefficient values (between <span>\\\\(1.0\\\\times 10^{-3}\\\\)</span> and <span>\\\\(2.5\\\\times 10^{-3}\\\\)</span>), the relative total uncertainty ranges from 25 and 50<span>\\\\(\\\\%\\\\)</span>. For stable or unstable conditions with a stability parameter <span>\\\\(|\\\\zeta |>1\\\\)</span> on average, the total uncertainty in the neutral drag coefficient exceeds the neutral drag coefficient value itself, while for <span>\\\\(|\\\\zeta |<1\\\\)</span> the total uncertainty is around 25<span>\\\\(\\\\%\\\\)</span> of the drag coefficient. For closer-to-neutral conditions, this uncertainty is dominated by measurement uncertainties in surface turbulent momentum fluxes which should therefore be the target of efforts in uncertainty reduction. We also propose an objective data-screening procedure for field data, which consists of retaining data for which the relative error on neutral drag coefficient does not exceed a given threshold. This method, in addition to the commonly used flux quality control procedure, allows for a reduction of the drag coefficient dispersion compared to other data-screening methods, which we take as an indication of better dataset quality.\\n</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Boundary-Layer Meteorology\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Boundary-Layer Meteorology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-023-00851-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boundary-Layer Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-023-00851-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Uncertainties of Drag Coefficient Estimates Above Sea Ice from Field Data
Surface turbulent exchanges play a key role on sea ice dynamics, on ocean and sea ice heat budgets and on the polar atmosphere. Uncertainties in parameterizations of surface turbulent fluxes are mostly held by the transfer coefficients and estimates of those transfer coefficients from field data are required for parameterization development. Measurement errors propagate through the computation of transfer coefficients and contribute to its total error together with the uncertainties in the empirical stability functions used to correct for stability effects. Here we propose a methodology to assess their contributions individually to each coefficient estimate as well as the total drag coefficient uncertainty and we apply this methodology on the example of the SHEBA campaign. We conclude that for most common drag coefficient values (between \(1.0\times 10^{-3}\) and \(2.5\times 10^{-3}\)), the relative total uncertainty ranges from 25 and 50\(\%\). For stable or unstable conditions with a stability parameter \(|\zeta |>1\) on average, the total uncertainty in the neutral drag coefficient exceeds the neutral drag coefficient value itself, while for \(|\zeta |<1\) the total uncertainty is around 25\(\%\) of the drag coefficient. For closer-to-neutral conditions, this uncertainty is dominated by measurement uncertainties in surface turbulent momentum fluxes which should therefore be the target of efforts in uncertainty reduction. We also propose an objective data-screening procedure for field data, which consists of retaining data for which the relative error on neutral drag coefficient does not exceed a given threshold. This method, in addition to the commonly used flux quality control procedure, allows for a reduction of the drag coefficient dispersion compared to other data-screening methods, which we take as an indication of better dataset quality.
期刊介绍:
Boundary-Layer Meteorology offers several publishing options: Research Letters, Research Articles, and Notes and Comments. The Research Letters section is designed to allow quick dissemination of new scientific findings, with an initial review period of no longer than one month. The Research Articles section offers traditional scientific papers that present results and interpretations based on substantial research studies or critical reviews of ongoing research. The Notes and Comments section comprises occasional notes and comments on specific topics with no requirement for rapid publication. Research Letters are limited in size to five journal pages, including no more than three figures, and cannot contain supplementary online material; Research Articles are generally fifteen to twenty pages in length with no more than fifteen figures; Notes and Comments are limited to ten journal pages and five figures. Authors submitting Research Letters should include within their cover letter an explanation of the need for rapid publication. More information regarding all publication formats can be found in the recent Editorial ‘Introducing Research Letters to Boundary-Layer Meteorology’.