利用差示扫描量热法估算结晶度:应用于基劳埃阿火山 2018 年东部下断裂带喷发

IF 3.5 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
B A Halverson, A Emerson, J Hammer, J Lira, A Whittington
{"title":"利用差示扫描量热法估算结晶度:应用于基劳埃阿火山 2018 年东部下断裂带喷发","authors":"B A Halverson, A Emerson, J Hammer, J Lira, A Whittington","doi":"10.1093/petrology/egae010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rocks produced by diverse processes, from condensation in space to impacts on planetary surfaces to volcanism, contain both crystals and amorphous material. Crystallinity provides information on the thermal history of the sample and is especially important in characterizing volcanic rocks and pyroclasts because lava rheology is profoundly influenced by the crystal content. Crystallinity is typically quantified via microscopy, using transmitted light or backscattered electrons. However, many samples present visibly ambiguous textures such as intimate intergrowth of crystal phases, and/or crystal sizes extending down to the nanometer scale. Here we apply calorimetric methods involving heat capacity and enthalpy to assess the crystallinity of a series of volcanic samples. We tested three different approaches, using differential scanning calorimetry, on 30-40 mg aliquots of powdered basalts from the 2018 Kīlauea lower East Rift Zone. The first approach involves determining the magnitude of the increase in heat capacity at the glass transition , which can determine crystallinity to a 1𝜎 precision of ±3%. The second approach is based on the enthalpy of fusion, which requires a longer more complex procedure with results that are typically more uncertain than for the heat capacity method, with a 1𝜎 of ±6%. A final method utilizing differences in enthalpies calculated from the heat capacities required the most complex procedure, and has the greatest uncertainty of ±18%. Preliminary results for lavas with microscopically determined crystallinities ranging from 11-98% indicate that crystallinity based on calorimetric data can be tens of percent higher than the average value identified using microscopy and petrographic analysis. Image-based methodologies applied to sections of samples reveal spatial heterogeneity and details in texture and crystallinity, whereas calorimetry-based methodologies capture the overall \"bulk sample\" properties, unbiased by section effects or imaging resolution limits. These techniques are a powerful combination that can present complementary views of crystallinity.","PeriodicalId":16751,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Petrology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimates of Crystallinity utilizing Differential Scanning Calorimetry: Application to the Kīlauea 2018 lower East Rift Zone Eruption\",\"authors\":\"B A Halverson, A Emerson, J Hammer, J Lira, A Whittington\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/petrology/egae010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rocks produced by diverse processes, from condensation in space to impacts on planetary surfaces to volcanism, contain both crystals and amorphous material. Crystallinity provides information on the thermal history of the sample and is especially important in characterizing volcanic rocks and pyroclasts because lava rheology is profoundly influenced by the crystal content. Crystallinity is typically quantified via microscopy, using transmitted light or backscattered electrons. However, many samples present visibly ambiguous textures such as intimate intergrowth of crystal phases, and/or crystal sizes extending down to the nanometer scale. Here we apply calorimetric methods involving heat capacity and enthalpy to assess the crystallinity of a series of volcanic samples. We tested three different approaches, using differential scanning calorimetry, on 30-40 mg aliquots of powdered basalts from the 2018 Kīlauea lower East Rift Zone. The first approach involves determining the magnitude of the increase in heat capacity at the glass transition , which can determine crystallinity to a 1𝜎 precision of ±3%. The second approach is based on the enthalpy of fusion, which requires a longer more complex procedure with results that are typically more uncertain than for the heat capacity method, with a 1𝜎 of ±6%. A final method utilizing differences in enthalpies calculated from the heat capacities required the most complex procedure, and has the greatest uncertainty of ±18%. Preliminary results for lavas with microscopically determined crystallinities ranging from 11-98% indicate that crystallinity based on calorimetric data can be tens of percent higher than the average value identified using microscopy and petrographic analysis. Image-based methodologies applied to sections of samples reveal spatial heterogeneity and details in texture and crystallinity, whereas calorimetry-based methodologies capture the overall \\\"bulk sample\\\" properties, unbiased by section effects or imaging resolution limits. These techniques are a powerful combination that can present complementary views of crystallinity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16751,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Petrology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Petrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egae010\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Petrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egae010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从太空凝结到行星表面撞击再到火山活动等不同过程产生的岩石都含有晶体和非晶体物质。结晶度可提供有关样品热历史的信息,在描述火山岩和火成岩的特征时尤为重要,因为熔岩流变学深受晶体含量的影响。晶体度通常通过显微镜,利用透射光或背散射电子进行量化。然而,许多样品呈现出明显的模糊纹理,如晶体相间紧密生长,和/或晶体尺寸小至纳米级。在此,我们采用热容量和热焓等热量测定方法来评估一系列火山岩样品的结晶度。我们使用差示扫描量热法,对来自 2018 年基劳埃阿下东部裂谷区的 30-40 毫克等分玄武岩粉末进行了三种不同方法的测试。第一种方法是测定玻璃化转变时热容量增加的幅度,这可以确定结晶度,1𝜎精度为±3%。第二种方法以熔焓为基础,需要更长更复杂的过程,其结果通常比热容量法更不确定,1𝜎 的精度为 ±6%。最后一种方法是利用热容量计算出的热焓差,这种方法需要最复杂的程序,其不确定性最大,为 ±18%。通过显微镜测定结晶度为 11-98% 的熔岩的初步结果表明,基于热量测定数据的结晶度可能比通过显微镜和岩相分析确定的平均值高出数十个百分点。基于图像的方法适用于样品切片,可揭示纹理和结晶度的空间异质性和细节,而基于量热法的方法可捕捉 "块状样品 "的整体特性,不受切片效应或成像分辨率限制的影响。这些技术是一种强大的组合,可以对结晶度进行互补性观察。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estimates of Crystallinity utilizing Differential Scanning Calorimetry: Application to the Kīlauea 2018 lower East Rift Zone Eruption
Rocks produced by diverse processes, from condensation in space to impacts on planetary surfaces to volcanism, contain both crystals and amorphous material. Crystallinity provides information on the thermal history of the sample and is especially important in characterizing volcanic rocks and pyroclasts because lava rheology is profoundly influenced by the crystal content. Crystallinity is typically quantified via microscopy, using transmitted light or backscattered electrons. However, many samples present visibly ambiguous textures such as intimate intergrowth of crystal phases, and/or crystal sizes extending down to the nanometer scale. Here we apply calorimetric methods involving heat capacity and enthalpy to assess the crystallinity of a series of volcanic samples. We tested three different approaches, using differential scanning calorimetry, on 30-40 mg aliquots of powdered basalts from the 2018 Kīlauea lower East Rift Zone. The first approach involves determining the magnitude of the increase in heat capacity at the glass transition , which can determine crystallinity to a 1𝜎 precision of ±3%. The second approach is based on the enthalpy of fusion, which requires a longer more complex procedure with results that are typically more uncertain than for the heat capacity method, with a 1𝜎 of ±6%. A final method utilizing differences in enthalpies calculated from the heat capacities required the most complex procedure, and has the greatest uncertainty of ±18%. Preliminary results for lavas with microscopically determined crystallinities ranging from 11-98% indicate that crystallinity based on calorimetric data can be tens of percent higher than the average value identified using microscopy and petrographic analysis. Image-based methodologies applied to sections of samples reveal spatial heterogeneity and details in texture and crystallinity, whereas calorimetry-based methodologies capture the overall "bulk sample" properties, unbiased by section effects or imaging resolution limits. These techniques are a powerful combination that can present complementary views of crystallinity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Petrology
Journal of Petrology 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Petrology provides an international forum for the publication of high quality research in the broad field of igneous and metamorphic petrology and petrogenesis. Papers published cover a vast range of topics in areas such as major element, trace element and isotope geochemistry and geochronology applied to petrogenesis; experimental petrology; processes of magma generation, differentiation and emplacement; quantitative studies of rock-forming minerals and their paragenesis; regional studies of igneous and meta morphic rocks which contribute to the solution of fundamental petrological problems; theoretical modelling of petrogenetic processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信