A. Martí-De Olives, M. C. Terol Cantero, M. Martín-Aragón, E. Lozano Chiarlones, M. J. Navarro-Ríos, C. Vázquez-Rodríguez
{"title":"大学性别平等感知量表(G.E.P.S.U)的编制和初步心理计量特性","authors":"A. Martí-De Olives, M. C. Terol Cantero, M. Martín-Aragón, E. Lozano Chiarlones, M. J. Navarro-Ríos, C. Vázquez-Rodríguez","doi":"10.1057/s41307-023-00341-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In recent decades, policies have been implemented in Europe to promote gender equality in higher education and in academic research. The Spanish Organic Law 3/2007 for the effective equality of women and men contemplates Gender Equality Plans (GEPs) as a tool for companies and organizations, including universities, to achieve this end. One of the most relevant concerns in any GEP is the initial diagnosis of the situation, but the literature also points out a need for periodical monitoring of the state of inequalities to measure the impact, effects and consequences of the implemented actions of the plan. Hence, the aim of this article was to develop a questionnaire for equality as perceived by staff in a university labor context and to explore its preliminary psychometric properties. The GEPSU (Gender Equality Perception Scale for Universities) was developed by a group of women researchers who all have expertise in gender studies and experience and training in GEPs. A total of 270 people from different staff categories answered the GEPSU by Google Form survey at a Spanish Public University. The results for the dimensional structure and construct validity of the GEPSU showed three factors: labor Equality (Factor 1), Conciliation (Factor 2) and Motherhood/Fatherhood (Factor 3). We found high correlations between them and the results for their internal consistency were optimal.</p>","PeriodicalId":47327,"journal":{"name":"Higher Education Policy","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Preliminary Psychometric Properties of the Gender Equality Perception Scale for Universities (G.E.P.S.U.)\",\"authors\":\"A. Martí-De Olives, M. C. Terol Cantero, M. Martín-Aragón, E. Lozano Chiarlones, M. J. Navarro-Ríos, C. Vázquez-Rodríguez\",\"doi\":\"10.1057/s41307-023-00341-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In recent decades, policies have been implemented in Europe to promote gender equality in higher education and in academic research. The Spanish Organic Law 3/2007 for the effective equality of women and men contemplates Gender Equality Plans (GEPs) as a tool for companies and organizations, including universities, to achieve this end. One of the most relevant concerns in any GEP is the initial diagnosis of the situation, but the literature also points out a need for periodical monitoring of the state of inequalities to measure the impact, effects and consequences of the implemented actions of the plan. Hence, the aim of this article was to develop a questionnaire for equality as perceived by staff in a university labor context and to explore its preliminary psychometric properties. The GEPSU (Gender Equality Perception Scale for Universities) was developed by a group of women researchers who all have expertise in gender studies and experience and training in GEPs. A total of 270 people from different staff categories answered the GEPSU by Google Form survey at a Spanish Public University. The results for the dimensional structure and construct validity of the GEPSU showed three factors: labor Equality (Factor 1), Conciliation (Factor 2) and Motherhood/Fatherhood (Factor 3). We found high correlations between them and the results for their internal consistency were optimal.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47327,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Higher Education Policy\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Higher Education Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-023-00341-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Higher Education Policy","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-023-00341-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development and Preliminary Psychometric Properties of the Gender Equality Perception Scale for Universities (G.E.P.S.U.)
In recent decades, policies have been implemented in Europe to promote gender equality in higher education and in academic research. The Spanish Organic Law 3/2007 for the effective equality of women and men contemplates Gender Equality Plans (GEPs) as a tool for companies and organizations, including universities, to achieve this end. One of the most relevant concerns in any GEP is the initial diagnosis of the situation, but the literature also points out a need for periodical monitoring of the state of inequalities to measure the impact, effects and consequences of the implemented actions of the plan. Hence, the aim of this article was to develop a questionnaire for equality as perceived by staff in a university labor context and to explore its preliminary psychometric properties. The GEPSU (Gender Equality Perception Scale for Universities) was developed by a group of women researchers who all have expertise in gender studies and experience and training in GEPs. A total of 270 people from different staff categories answered the GEPSU by Google Form survey at a Spanish Public University. The results for the dimensional structure and construct validity of the GEPSU showed three factors: labor Equality (Factor 1), Conciliation (Factor 2) and Motherhood/Fatherhood (Factor 3). We found high correlations between them and the results for their internal consistency were optimal.
期刊介绍:
Higher Education Policy is an international peer-reviewed and SSCI-indexed academic journal focusing on higher education policy in a broad sense. The journal considers submissions that discuss national and supra-national higher education policies and/or analyse their impacts on higher education institutions or the academic community: leadership, faculty, staff and students, but also considers papers that deal with governance and policy issues at the level of higher education institutions. Critical analyses, empirical investigations (either qualitative or quantitative), and theoretical-conceptual contributions are equally welcome, but for all submissions the requirement is that papers be embedded in the relevant academic literature and contribute to furthering our understanding of policy.
The journal has a preference for papers that are written from a disciplinary or interdisciplinary perspective. In the past, contributors have relied on perspectives from public administration, political science, sociology, history, economics and law, but also from philosophy, psychology and anthropology. Articles devoted to systems of higher education that are less well-known or less often analysed are particularly welcome.
Given the international scope of the journal, articles should be written for and be understood by an international audience, consisting of researchers in higher education, disciplinary researchers, and policy-makers, administrators, managers and practitioners in higher education. Contributions should not normally exceed 7,000 words (excluding references). Peer reviewAll submissions to the journal will undergo rigorous peer review (anonymous referees) after an initial editorial screening on quality and fit with the journal''s aims.Special issues
The journal welcomes proposals for special issues. The journal archive contains several examples of special issues. Such proposals, to be sent to the editor, should set out the theme of the special issue and include the names of the (proposed) contributors and summaries of the envisaged contributions. Forum section
Occasionally, the journal publishes contributions – in its Forum section – based on personal viewpoints and/or experiences with the intent to stimulate discussion and reflection, or to challenge established thinking in the field of higher education.