Ivana Lapić, Dunja Rogić, Ana Lončar Vrančić, Ivan Gornik
{"title":"探索性分析神经胶质纤维酸性蛋白和泛素 C 端水解酶 L1 对在急诊科接受头部计算机断层扫描的轻微神经症状患者的治疗作用:克罗地亚一家三级医院的试点研究。","authors":"Ivana Lapić, Dunja Rogić, Ana Lončar Vrančić, Ivan Gornik","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmad116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diagnostic accuracy of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) in identification of intracranial abnormalities detected by computed tomography (CT) in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), and in patients with mild neurological symptoms not caused by head trauma but suspected with a neurological disorder, was examined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>GFAP and UCH-L1 were determined using the chemiluminescence immunoassays on the Alinity i analyzer (Abbott Laboratories).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significantly higher GFAP (median 53.8 vs 25.7 ng/L, P < .001) and UCH-L1 (median 350.9 vs 153.9 ng/L, P < .001) were found in mTBI compared to non-head trauma patients. In mTBI diagnostic sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) for the combination of GFAP and UCH-L1 were 100% and 30.9%, respectively, with area under the curve (AUC) 0.655. GFAP alone yielded Se 85.7%, Sp 41.8%, and AUC 0.638, while UCH-L1 yielded Se 57.1%, Sp 56.4%, and AUC 0.568. In non-head trauma patients, the combination of GFAP and UCH-L1 showed Se 100%, Sp 87.9%, and AUC 0.939, while GFAP alone demonstrated Se 100%, Sp 90.9%, and AUC 0.955.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>If these results are reproduced on a larger sample, GFAP and UCH-L1 may reduce CT use in patients with mild neurological symptoms after systemic causes exclusion and neurologist's evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94124,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"492-497"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploratory analysis of glial fibrillary acidic protein and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 in management of patients with mild neurological symptoms undergoing head computed tomography scan at the emergency department: a pilot study from a Croatian tertiary hospital.\",\"authors\":\"Ivana Lapić, Dunja Rogić, Ana Lončar Vrančić, Ivan Gornik\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/labmed/lmad116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diagnostic accuracy of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) in identification of intracranial abnormalities detected by computed tomography (CT) in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), and in patients with mild neurological symptoms not caused by head trauma but suspected with a neurological disorder, was examined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>GFAP and UCH-L1 were determined using the chemiluminescence immunoassays on the Alinity i analyzer (Abbott Laboratories).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significantly higher GFAP (median 53.8 vs 25.7 ng/L, P < .001) and UCH-L1 (median 350.9 vs 153.9 ng/L, P < .001) were found in mTBI compared to non-head trauma patients. In mTBI diagnostic sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) for the combination of GFAP and UCH-L1 were 100% and 30.9%, respectively, with area under the curve (AUC) 0.655. GFAP alone yielded Se 85.7%, Sp 41.8%, and AUC 0.638, while UCH-L1 yielded Se 57.1%, Sp 56.4%, and AUC 0.568. In non-head trauma patients, the combination of GFAP and UCH-L1 showed Se 100%, Sp 87.9%, and AUC 0.939, while GFAP alone demonstrated Se 100%, Sp 90.9%, and AUC 0.955.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>If these results are reproduced on a larger sample, GFAP and UCH-L1 may reduce CT use in patients with mild neurological symptoms after systemic causes exclusion and neurologist's evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laboratory medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"492-497\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laboratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmad116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmad116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:研究了神经胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)和泛素C-末端水解酶L1(UCH-L1)在轻度脑外伤(mTBI)患者和非头部外伤引起的轻度神经症状但怀疑患有神经系统疾病的患者中用于识别计算机断层扫描(CT)检测到的颅内异常的诊断准确性:方法:使用 Alinity i 分析仪(雅培实验室)上的化学发光免疫测定法测定 GFAP 和 UCH-L1:结果:GFAP 明显高于 UCH-L1(中位数为 53.8 vs 25.7 ng/L,P如果这些结果能在更大样本中重现,GFAP 和 UCH-L1 可减少轻微神经症状患者在排除全身病因和神经科医生评估后使用 CT 的次数。
Exploratory analysis of glial fibrillary acidic protein and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 in management of patients with mild neurological symptoms undergoing head computed tomography scan at the emergency department: a pilot study from a Croatian tertiary hospital.
Background: Diagnostic accuracy of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) in identification of intracranial abnormalities detected by computed tomography (CT) in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), and in patients with mild neurological symptoms not caused by head trauma but suspected with a neurological disorder, was examined.
Methods: GFAP and UCH-L1 were determined using the chemiluminescence immunoassays on the Alinity i analyzer (Abbott Laboratories).
Results: Significantly higher GFAP (median 53.8 vs 25.7 ng/L, P < .001) and UCH-L1 (median 350.9 vs 153.9 ng/L, P < .001) were found in mTBI compared to non-head trauma patients. In mTBI diagnostic sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) for the combination of GFAP and UCH-L1 were 100% and 30.9%, respectively, with area under the curve (AUC) 0.655. GFAP alone yielded Se 85.7%, Sp 41.8%, and AUC 0.638, while UCH-L1 yielded Se 57.1%, Sp 56.4%, and AUC 0.568. In non-head trauma patients, the combination of GFAP and UCH-L1 showed Se 100%, Sp 87.9%, and AUC 0.939, while GFAP alone demonstrated Se 100%, Sp 90.9%, and AUC 0.955.
Conclusions: If these results are reproduced on a larger sample, GFAP and UCH-L1 may reduce CT use in patients with mild neurological symptoms after systemic causes exclusion and neurologist's evaluation.