失语症参与式研究:如何调动照顾者的经验知识?

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sante Publique Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Camille Carpentier, Alexandra Dima, Leslie Vollet, Ruthie Chantre, Marie Préau
{"title":"失语症参与式研究:如何调动照顾者的经验知识?","authors":"Camille Carpentier, Alexandra Dima, Leslie Vollet, Ruthie Chantre, Marie Préau","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Strokes are the main cause of aphasia, a language disorder that makes it difficult to communicate with others. In the acute phase, patients are cared for in neurovascular departments. In this acute care context, conducting research among caregivers to gather their experiences of caregiver-patient relationships with regard to aphasic patients can be complex.</p><p><strong>Purpose of research: </strong>To propose a participatory research methodology utilizing knowledge arising from the lived experiences of nurses and care assistants in a neurovascular department.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A qualitative study based on observation was carried out with a view to ensuring that all the stakeholders involved were fully integrated into the field research. The analysis was carried out in a participatory manner with a nurse and a care assistant, using the grounded theory approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one care situations were observed over a three-month period. Following an initial report, eight situations from this group were selected and analyzed following the six stages of grounded theory analysis, four of which were carried out in a participatory manner with a nurse and a care assistant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Discussing caregivers&#8217; involvement in the research with them beforehand, given their professional constraints, helped maximize their participation throughout the study. The dynamics of the reporting and analysis stages were conducive to utilizing the nurses&#8217; and care assistants&#8217; lived experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":49575,"journal":{"name":"Sante Publique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La recherche participative en aphasiologie : comment mobiliser les savoirs expérientiels des soignants ?\",\"authors\":\"Camille Carpentier, Alexandra Dima, Leslie Vollet, Ruthie Chantre, Marie Préau\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Strokes are the main cause of aphasia, a language disorder that makes it difficult to communicate with others. In the acute phase, patients are cared for in neurovascular departments. In this acute care context, conducting research among caregivers to gather their experiences of caregiver-patient relationships with regard to aphasic patients can be complex.</p><p><strong>Purpose of research: </strong>To propose a participatory research methodology utilizing knowledge arising from the lived experiences of nurses and care assistants in a neurovascular department.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A qualitative study based on observation was carried out with a view to ensuring that all the stakeholders involved were fully integrated into the field research. The analysis was carried out in a participatory manner with a nurse and a care assistant, using the grounded theory approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one care situations were observed over a three-month period. Following an initial report, eight situations from this group were selected and analyzed following the six stages of grounded theory analysis, four of which were carried out in a participatory manner with a nurse and a care assistant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Discussing caregivers&#8217; involvement in the research with them beforehand, given their professional constraints, helped maximize their participation throughout the study. The dynamics of the reporting and analysis stages were conducive to utilizing the nurses&#8217; and care assistants&#8217; lived experiences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sante Publique\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sante Publique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sante Publique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介脑卒中是导致失语症的主要原因,失语症是一种语言障碍,使人难以与他人交流。在急性期,患者在神经血管科接受治疗。在这种急症护理环境下,在护理人员中开展研究,收集他们对失语症患者的护理人员与患者之间关系的经验,可能会很复杂:研究目的:提出一种参与式研究方法,利用从神经血管科护士和护理助理的生活经验中获得的知识:方法:在观察的基础上进行定性研究,以确保所有相关人员都能充分参与到实地研究中。采用基础理论方法,与一名护士和一名护理助理共同参与分析:在三个月的时间里,观察了 21 种护理情况。在初步报告之后,从这组情况中挑选出八种情况,按照基础理论分析的六个阶段进行了分析,其中四个阶段是以护士和护理助理参与的方式进行的:结论:考虑到护理人员的职业限制,事先与他们讨论参与研究的问题有助于最大限度地提高他们在整个研究过程中的参与度。报告和分析阶段的动态有利于利用护士和护理助理的生活经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
La recherche participative en aphasiologie : comment mobiliser les savoirs expérientiels des soignants ?

Introduction: Strokes are the main cause of aphasia, a language disorder that makes it difficult to communicate with others. In the acute phase, patients are cared for in neurovascular departments. In this acute care context, conducting research among caregivers to gather their experiences of caregiver-patient relationships with regard to aphasic patients can be complex.

Purpose of research: To propose a participatory research methodology utilizing knowledge arising from the lived experiences of nurses and care assistants in a neurovascular department.

Method: A qualitative study based on observation was carried out with a view to ensuring that all the stakeholders involved were fully integrated into the field research. The analysis was carried out in a participatory manner with a nurse and a care assistant, using the grounded theory approach.

Results: Twenty-one care situations were observed over a three-month period. Following an initial report, eight situations from this group were selected and analyzed following the six stages of grounded theory analysis, four of which were carried out in a participatory manner with a nurse and a care assistant.

Conclusions: Discussing caregivers’ involvement in the research with them beforehand, given their professional constraints, helped maximize their participation throughout the study. The dynamics of the reporting and analysis stages were conducive to utilizing the nurses’ and care assistants’ lived experiences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sante Publique
Sante Publique PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
252
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: La revue Santé Publique s’adresse à l’ensemble des acteurs de santé publique qu’ils soient décideurs, professionnels de santé, acteurs de terrain, chercheurs, enseignants ou formateurs, etc. Elle publie des travaux de recherche, des évaluations, des analyses d’action, des réflexions sur des interventions de santé, des opinions, relevant des champs de la santé publique et de l’analyse des services de soins, des sciences sociales et de l’action sociale. Santé publique est une revue à comité de lecture, multidisciplinaire et généraliste, qui publie sur l’ensemble des thèmes de la santé publique parmi lesquels : accès et recours aux soins, déterminants et inégalités sociales de santé, prévention, éducation pour la santé, promotion de la santé, organisation des soins, environnement, formation des professionnels de santé, nutrition, politiques de santé, pratiques professionnelles, qualité des soins, gestion des risques sanitaires, représentation et santé perçue, santé scolaire, santé et travail, systèmes de santé, systèmes d’information, veille sanitaire, déterminants de la consommation de soins, organisation et économie des différents secteurs de production de soins (hôpital, médicament, etc.), évaluation médico-économique d’activités de soins ou de prévention et de programmes de santé, planification des ressources, politiques de régulation et de financement, etc
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信