{"title":"卫生信息系统研究中的定性研究方法综述》。","authors":"Kyoungsoo Park, Woojong Moon","doi":"10.4258/hir.2024.30.1.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to review hospital-based health information system (HIS) studies that used qualitative research methods and evaluate their methodological contexts and implications. In addition, we propose practical guidelines for HIS researchers who plan to use qualitative research methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected papers published from 2012 to 2022 by searching the PubMed and CINAHL databases. As search keywords, we used specific system terms related to HISs, such as \"electronic medical records\" and \"clinical decision support systems,\" linked with their operational terms, such as \"implementation\" and \"adaptation,\" and qualitative methodological terms such as \"observation\" and \"in-depth interview.\" We finally selected 74 studies that met this review's inclusion criteria and conducted an analytical review of the selected studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed the selected articles according to the following four points: the general characteristics of the selected articles; research design; participant sampling, identification, and recruitment; and data collection, processing, and analysis. This review found methodologically problematic issues regarding researchers' reflections, participant sampling methods and research accessibility, and data management.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reports on the qualitative research process should include descriptions of researchers' reflections and ethical considerations, which are meaningful for strengthening the rigor and credibility of qualitative research. Based on these discussions, we suggest guidance for conducting ethical, feasible, and reliable qualitative research on HISs in hospital settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12947,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Informatics Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10879827/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of Qualitative Research Methods in Health Information System Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Kyoungsoo Park, Woojong Moon\",\"doi\":\"10.4258/hir.2024.30.1.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to review hospital-based health information system (HIS) studies that used qualitative research methods and evaluate their methodological contexts and implications. In addition, we propose practical guidelines for HIS researchers who plan to use qualitative research methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected papers published from 2012 to 2022 by searching the PubMed and CINAHL databases. As search keywords, we used specific system terms related to HISs, such as \\\"electronic medical records\\\" and \\\"clinical decision support systems,\\\" linked with their operational terms, such as \\\"implementation\\\" and \\\"adaptation,\\\" and qualitative methodological terms such as \\\"observation\\\" and \\\"in-depth interview.\\\" We finally selected 74 studies that met this review's inclusion criteria and conducted an analytical review of the selected studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed the selected articles according to the following four points: the general characteristics of the selected articles; research design; participant sampling, identification, and recruitment; and data collection, processing, and analysis. This review found methodologically problematic issues regarding researchers' reflections, participant sampling methods and research accessibility, and data management.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reports on the qualitative research process should include descriptions of researchers' reflections and ethical considerations, which are meaningful for strengthening the rigor and credibility of qualitative research. Based on these discussions, we suggest guidance for conducting ethical, feasible, and reliable qualitative research on HISs in hospital settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare Informatics Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10879827/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare Informatics Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2024.30.1.16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Informatics Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2024.30.1.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究目的本研究旨在回顾以医院为基础、使用定性研究方法的医疗信息系统(HIS)研究,并评估其方法论背景和影响。此外,我们还为计划使用定性研究方法的 HIS 研究人员提出了实用指南:我们通过检索 PubMed 和 CINAHL 数据库,收集了 2012 年至 2022 年发表的论文。作为检索关键词,我们使用了与 HIS 相关的特定系统术语,如 "电子病历 "和 "临床决策支持系统",并将其与操作术语(如 "实施 "和 "适应")以及定性方法术语(如 "观察 "和 "深入访谈")联系起来。我们最终选择了 74 篇符合本综述纳入标准的研究,并对所选研究进行了分析性综述:我们根据以下四点对所选文章进行了分析:所选文章的总体特征;研究设计;参与者抽样、识别和招募;数据收集、处理和分析。本综述发现,在研究者的反思、参与者抽样方法和研究的可及性以及数据管理方面存在方法论问题:关于定性研究过程的报告应包括对研究人员的反思和伦理考虑因素的描述,这对加强定性研究的严谨性和可信度很有意义。基于以上讨论,我们为在医院环境中开展符合伦理、可行且可靠的 HIS 定性研究提出了指导建议。
Review of Qualitative Research Methods in Health Information System Studies.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to review hospital-based health information system (HIS) studies that used qualitative research methods and evaluate their methodological contexts and implications. In addition, we propose practical guidelines for HIS researchers who plan to use qualitative research methods.
Methods: We collected papers published from 2012 to 2022 by searching the PubMed and CINAHL databases. As search keywords, we used specific system terms related to HISs, such as "electronic medical records" and "clinical decision support systems," linked with their operational terms, such as "implementation" and "adaptation," and qualitative methodological terms such as "observation" and "in-depth interview." We finally selected 74 studies that met this review's inclusion criteria and conducted an analytical review of the selected studies.
Results: We analyzed the selected articles according to the following four points: the general characteristics of the selected articles; research design; participant sampling, identification, and recruitment; and data collection, processing, and analysis. This review found methodologically problematic issues regarding researchers' reflections, participant sampling methods and research accessibility, and data management.
Conclusions: Reports on the qualitative research process should include descriptions of researchers' reflections and ethical considerations, which are meaningful for strengthening the rigor and credibility of qualitative research. Based on these discussions, we suggest guidance for conducting ethical, feasible, and reliable qualitative research on HISs in hospital settings.