患者和临床医生拍摄的图像之间的差异:皮肤病虚拟治疗的意义

Rajeev V. Rikhye PhD , Grace Eunhae Hong BA , Preeti Singh MS , Margaret Ann Smith MBA , Aaron Loh MS , Vijaytha Muralidharan MD , Doris Wong BS , Rory Sayres PhD , Michelle Phung MS , Nicolas Betancourt MD , Bradley Fong BS , Rachna Sahasrabudhe BA , Khoban Nasim BS , Alec Eschholz BA , Yossi Matias PhD , Greg S. Corrado PhD , Katherine Chou MS , Dale R. Webster PhD , Peggy Bui MD, MBA , Yuan Liu PhD , Steven Lin MD
{"title":"患者和临床医生拍摄的图像之间的差异:皮肤病虚拟治疗的意义","authors":"Rajeev V. Rikhye PhD ,&nbsp;Grace Eunhae Hong BA ,&nbsp;Preeti Singh MS ,&nbsp;Margaret Ann Smith MBA ,&nbsp;Aaron Loh MS ,&nbsp;Vijaytha Muralidharan MD ,&nbsp;Doris Wong BS ,&nbsp;Rory Sayres PhD ,&nbsp;Michelle Phung MS ,&nbsp;Nicolas Betancourt MD ,&nbsp;Bradley Fong BS ,&nbsp;Rachna Sahasrabudhe BA ,&nbsp;Khoban Nasim BS ,&nbsp;Alec Eschholz BA ,&nbsp;Yossi Matias PhD ,&nbsp;Greg S. Corrado PhD ,&nbsp;Katherine Chou MS ,&nbsp;Dale R. Webster PhD ,&nbsp;Peggy Bui MD, MBA ,&nbsp;Yuan Liu PhD ,&nbsp;Steven Lin MD","doi":"10.1016/j.mcpdig.2024.01.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To understand and highlight the differences in clinical, demographic, and image quality characteristics between patient-taken (PAT) and clinic-taken (CLIN) photographs of skin conditions.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study applied logistic regression to data from 2500 deidentified cases in Stanford Health Care’s eConsult system, from November 2015 to January 2021. Cases with undiagnosable or multiple conditions or cases with both patient and clinician image sources were excluded, leaving 628 PAT cases and 1719 CLIN cases. Demographic characteristic factors, such as age and sex were self-reported, whereas anatomic location, estimated skin type, clinical signs and symptoms, condition duration, and condition frequency were summarized from patient health records. Image quality variables such as blur, lighting issues and whether the image contained skin, hair, or nails were estimated through a deep learning model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Factors that were positively associated with CLIN photographs, post-2020 were as follows: age 60 years or older, darker skin types (eFST V/VI), and presence of skin growths. By contrast, factors that were positively associated with PAT photographs include conditions appearing intermittently, cases with blurry photographs, photographs with substantial nonskin (or nail/hair) regions and cases with more than 3 photographs. Within the PAT cohort, older age was associated with blurry photographs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There are various demographic, clinical, and image quality characteristic differences between PAT and CLIN photographs of skin concerns. The demographic characteristic differences present important considerations for improving digital literacy or access, whereas the image quality differences point to the need for improved patient education and better image capture workflows, particularly among elderly patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74127,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health","volume":"2 1","pages":"Pages 107-118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949761224000063/pdfft?md5=b6821d4312bb7e3ec9c3c66208aec937&pid=1-s2.0-S2949761224000063-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences Between Patient and Clinician-Taken Images: Implications for Virtual Care of Skin Conditions\",\"authors\":\"Rajeev V. Rikhye PhD ,&nbsp;Grace Eunhae Hong BA ,&nbsp;Preeti Singh MS ,&nbsp;Margaret Ann Smith MBA ,&nbsp;Aaron Loh MS ,&nbsp;Vijaytha Muralidharan MD ,&nbsp;Doris Wong BS ,&nbsp;Rory Sayres PhD ,&nbsp;Michelle Phung MS ,&nbsp;Nicolas Betancourt MD ,&nbsp;Bradley Fong BS ,&nbsp;Rachna Sahasrabudhe BA ,&nbsp;Khoban Nasim BS ,&nbsp;Alec Eschholz BA ,&nbsp;Yossi Matias PhD ,&nbsp;Greg S. Corrado PhD ,&nbsp;Katherine Chou MS ,&nbsp;Dale R. Webster PhD ,&nbsp;Peggy Bui MD, MBA ,&nbsp;Yuan Liu PhD ,&nbsp;Steven Lin MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mcpdig.2024.01.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To understand and highlight the differences in clinical, demographic, and image quality characteristics between patient-taken (PAT) and clinic-taken (CLIN) photographs of skin conditions.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study applied logistic regression to data from 2500 deidentified cases in Stanford Health Care’s eConsult system, from November 2015 to January 2021. Cases with undiagnosable or multiple conditions or cases with both patient and clinician image sources were excluded, leaving 628 PAT cases and 1719 CLIN cases. Demographic characteristic factors, such as age and sex were self-reported, whereas anatomic location, estimated skin type, clinical signs and symptoms, condition duration, and condition frequency were summarized from patient health records. Image quality variables such as blur, lighting issues and whether the image contained skin, hair, or nails were estimated through a deep learning model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Factors that were positively associated with CLIN photographs, post-2020 were as follows: age 60 years or older, darker skin types (eFST V/VI), and presence of skin growths. By contrast, factors that were positively associated with PAT photographs include conditions appearing intermittently, cases with blurry photographs, photographs with substantial nonskin (or nail/hair) regions and cases with more than 3 photographs. Within the PAT cohort, older age was associated with blurry photographs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There are various demographic, clinical, and image quality characteristic differences between PAT and CLIN photographs of skin concerns. The demographic characteristic differences present important considerations for improving digital literacy or access, whereas the image quality differences point to the need for improved patient education and better image capture workflows, particularly among elderly patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 107-118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949761224000063/pdfft?md5=b6821d4312bb7e3ec9c3c66208aec937&pid=1-s2.0-S2949761224000063-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949761224000063\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949761224000063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的了解并强调患者拍摄的皮肤状况照片(PAT)和临床医生拍摄的皮肤状况照片(CLIN)在临床、人口统计学和图像质量特征方面的差异。患者和方法这项回顾性研究对斯坦福医疗保健公司 eConsult 系统中 2015 年 11 月至 2021 年 1 月的 2500 个去标识化病例的数据进行了逻辑回归。排除了无法诊断或患有多种疾病的病例,或同时具有患者和临床医生图片来源的病例,剩下 628 个 PAT 病例和 1719 个 CLIN 病例。年龄和性别等人口统计学特征因素由患者自我报告,而解剖位置、估计皮肤类型、临床症状和体征、病程和发病频率则由患者健康记录汇总。图像质量变量,如模糊、光照问题以及图像是否包含皮肤、毛发或指甲,则通过深度学习模型进行估算。结果2020年后与CLIN照片呈正相关的因素如下:60岁或以上、深色皮肤类型(eFST V/VI)以及存在皮肤增生。相比之下,与 PAT 照片呈正相关的因素包括间歇性出现的病症、照片模糊的病例、有大量非皮肤(或指甲/头发)区域的照片以及有 3 张以上照片的病例。结论:PAT 和 CLIN 皮肤照片在人口统计学、临床和图像质量特征方面存在各种差异。人口统计学特征差异是提高数字扫盲或数字访问的重要考虑因素,而图像质量差异则表明需要加强患者教育和改进图像采集工作流程,尤其是在老年患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differences Between Patient and Clinician-Taken Images: Implications for Virtual Care of Skin Conditions

Objective

To understand and highlight the differences in clinical, demographic, and image quality characteristics between patient-taken (PAT) and clinic-taken (CLIN) photographs of skin conditions.

Patients and Methods

This retrospective study applied logistic regression to data from 2500 deidentified cases in Stanford Health Care’s eConsult system, from November 2015 to January 2021. Cases with undiagnosable or multiple conditions or cases with both patient and clinician image sources were excluded, leaving 628 PAT cases and 1719 CLIN cases. Demographic characteristic factors, such as age and sex were self-reported, whereas anatomic location, estimated skin type, clinical signs and symptoms, condition duration, and condition frequency were summarized from patient health records. Image quality variables such as blur, lighting issues and whether the image contained skin, hair, or nails were estimated through a deep learning model.

Results

Factors that were positively associated with CLIN photographs, post-2020 were as follows: age 60 years or older, darker skin types (eFST V/VI), and presence of skin growths. By contrast, factors that were positively associated with PAT photographs include conditions appearing intermittently, cases with blurry photographs, photographs with substantial nonskin (or nail/hair) regions and cases with more than 3 photographs. Within the PAT cohort, older age was associated with blurry photographs.

Conclusion

There are various demographic, clinical, and image quality characteristic differences between PAT and CLIN photographs of skin concerns. The demographic characteristic differences present important considerations for improving digital literacy or access, whereas the image quality differences point to the need for improved patient education and better image capture workflows, particularly among elderly patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health
Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health Medicine and Dentistry (General), Health Informatics, Public Health and Health Policy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信