严重精神疾病与心脏保护药物处方:全科医学定性研究。

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
BJGP Open Pub Date : 2024-07-29 Print Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0176
Amanda Vettini, Gearóid K Brennan, Stewart W Mercer, Caroline A Jackson
{"title":"严重精神疾病与心脏保护药物处方:全科医学定性研究。","authors":"Amanda Vettini, Gearóid K Brennan, Stewart W Mercer, Caroline A Jackson","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with severe mental illness (SMI) die 10-20 years earlier than the general population. They have a higher risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) yet may experience lower cardioprotective medication prescribing.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To understand the challenges experienced by GPs in prescribing cardioprotective medication to patients with SMI.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>A qualitative study with 15 GPs from 11 practices in two Scottish health boards, including practices servicing highly deprived areas (Deep End).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Semi-structured one-to-one interviews with fully qualified GPs with clinical experience of patients with SMI. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants aimed to routinely prescribe cardioprotective medication to relevant patients with SMI but were hampered by various challenges. These structural and contextual barriers included the following: lack of funding for chronic disease management; insufficient consultation time; workforce shortages; IT infrastructure; and navigating boundaries with mental health services. Patient-related barriers included patients' complex health and social needs, their understandable prioritisation of mental health needs or existing physical conditions, and presentation during crises. Professional barriers comprised GPs' desire to practise holistic medicine rather than treating via cardioprotective prescribing in isolation, and concerns about patients' medication concordance if patients were not prioritising this aspect of their health care at that particular time. In terms of enablers for cardioprotective prescribing, participants emphasised continuity of care as fundamental in engaging this patient group in effective cardiovascular health management. A cross-cutting theme was the current GP workforce crisis leading to 'firefighting' and diminishing capacity for primary prevention. This was particularly acute in Deep End practices, which have a high proportion of patients with complex needs and greater resource challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although participants aspire to prescribe cardioprotective medication to patients with SMI, professional-, system- and patient-level barriers often make this challenging, particularly in deprived areas owing to patient complexity and the inverse care law.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11300976/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Severe mental illness and cardioprotective medication prescribing: a qualitative study in general practice.\",\"authors\":\"Amanda Vettini, Gearóid K Brennan, Stewart W Mercer, Caroline A Jackson\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with severe mental illness (SMI) die 10-20 years earlier than the general population. They have a higher risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) yet may experience lower cardioprotective medication prescribing.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To understand the challenges experienced by GPs in prescribing cardioprotective medication to patients with SMI.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>A qualitative study with 15 GPs from 11 practices in two Scottish health boards, including practices servicing highly deprived areas (Deep End).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Semi-structured one-to-one interviews with fully qualified GPs with clinical experience of patients with SMI. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants aimed to routinely prescribe cardioprotective medication to relevant patients with SMI but were hampered by various challenges. These structural and contextual barriers included the following: lack of funding for chronic disease management; insufficient consultation time; workforce shortages; IT infrastructure; and navigating boundaries with mental health services. Patient-related barriers included patients' complex health and social needs, their understandable prioritisation of mental health needs or existing physical conditions, and presentation during crises. Professional barriers comprised GPs' desire to practise holistic medicine rather than treating via cardioprotective prescribing in isolation, and concerns about patients' medication concordance if patients were not prioritising this aspect of their health care at that particular time. In terms of enablers for cardioprotective prescribing, participants emphasised continuity of care as fundamental in engaging this patient group in effective cardiovascular health management. A cross-cutting theme was the current GP workforce crisis leading to 'firefighting' and diminishing capacity for primary prevention. This was particularly acute in Deep End practices, which have a high proportion of patients with complex needs and greater resource challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although participants aspire to prescribe cardioprotective medication to patients with SMI, professional-, system- and patient-level barriers often make this challenging, particularly in deprived areas owing to patient complexity and the inverse care law.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJGP Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11300976/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJGP Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0176\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:严重精神疾病(SMI)患者比普通人群早死 10-20 年。目的:了解全科医生在为严重精神疾病患者开具心脏保护药物处方时所遇到的挑战:一项定性研究,研究对象为苏格兰两个卫生局11家诊所的15名全科医生,其中包括服务于高度贫困地区(Deep End)的诊所:对具有 SMI 患者临床经验的全科医生进行 1:1 半结构访谈。对访谈内容进行逐字记录和专题分析:参与者的目标是为相关的 SMI 患者常规处方心脏保护药物,但却受到各种挑战的阻碍。这些挑战包括:缺乏慢性病管理资金、咨询时间不足、劳动力短缺、IT 基础设施以及与精神健康服务机构之间的界限。与患者相关的挑战包括:患者复杂的健康和社会需求、他们对精神健康需求/现有身体状况的理解优先级,以及在危机期间的表现。与会者强调,持续的医疗服务是让这一患者群体参与有效心血管健康管理的基础。一个贯穿各领域的主题是当前的医生队伍危机导致 "救火 "和初级预防能力下降。这一点在 "深远区 "诊所尤为突出,因为那里有大量需求复杂的患者,面临着更大的资源挑战:尽管参与者渴望为 SMI 患者开具心脏保护药物处方,但专业、系统和患者层面的障碍往往使其具有挑战性,尤其是在贫困地区,原因在于患者的复杂性和反向护理法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Severe mental illness and cardioprotective medication prescribing: a qualitative study in general practice.

Background: Patients with severe mental illness (SMI) die 10-20 years earlier than the general population. They have a higher risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) yet may experience lower cardioprotective medication prescribing.

Aim: To understand the challenges experienced by GPs in prescribing cardioprotective medication to patients with SMI.

Design & setting: A qualitative study with 15 GPs from 11 practices in two Scottish health boards, including practices servicing highly deprived areas (Deep End).

Method: Semi-structured one-to-one interviews with fully qualified GPs with clinical experience of patients with SMI. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically.

Results: Participants aimed to routinely prescribe cardioprotective medication to relevant patients with SMI but were hampered by various challenges. These structural and contextual barriers included the following: lack of funding for chronic disease management; insufficient consultation time; workforce shortages; IT infrastructure; and navigating boundaries with mental health services. Patient-related barriers included patients' complex health and social needs, their understandable prioritisation of mental health needs or existing physical conditions, and presentation during crises. Professional barriers comprised GPs' desire to practise holistic medicine rather than treating via cardioprotective prescribing in isolation, and concerns about patients' medication concordance if patients were not prioritising this aspect of their health care at that particular time. In terms of enablers for cardioprotective prescribing, participants emphasised continuity of care as fundamental in engaging this patient group in effective cardiovascular health management. A cross-cutting theme was the current GP workforce crisis leading to 'firefighting' and diminishing capacity for primary prevention. This was particularly acute in Deep End practices, which have a high proportion of patients with complex needs and greater resource challenges.

Conclusion: Although participants aspire to prescribe cardioprotective medication to patients with SMI, professional-, system- and patient-level barriers often make this challenging, particularly in deprived areas owing to patient complexity and the inverse care law.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信