Cristian Justribó-Manion, Juan Mesa-Jiménez, Javier Bara-Casaus, Juan-Carlos Zuil-Escobar, Katarzyna Wachowska, Gerard Álvarez-Bustins
{"title":"治疗性运动和教育对慢性颞下颌关节紊乱症手法治疗的额外效果:随机临床试验。","authors":"Cristian Justribó-Manion, Juan Mesa-Jiménez, Javier Bara-Casaus, Juan-Carlos Zuil-Escobar, Katarzyna Wachowska, Gerard Álvarez-Bustins","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2024.2316305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have evaluated the implementation of behavioral approaches in individuals with chronic temporomandibular disorders (TMDs).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the benefits of a behavioral approach to craniofacial pain. Second, we assessed the benefits of kinesiophobia, catastrophizing, mouth opening without pain, and forward head posture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individuals with chronic TMDs were treated for five weeks. The intervention group (<i>n</i> = 17) underwent pain neuroscience education, manual therapy, and therapeutic exercise, whereas the control group (<i>n</i> = 17) underwent manual therapy only. Outcomes were evaluated immediately, at seven and 19 weeks follow-up. The assessment tools used were the Craniofacial Pain Disability Inventory, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, Mandibular Range of Motion Scale, and Cervical Range of Motion Tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The interventions did not influence the differences in the improvements between the groups observed for craniofacial pain disability (inter-subject p 0.4). The intervention had a moderate influence on the improvement of kinesiophobia and catastrophizing (Inter-subject p 0.09 and 0.1 respectively) with a clinically significant effect size (Estimated mean (EM) -8.6 standard deviation (SD) ±3.48 p 0.019; and EM -7.6 SD ± 5.11 p 0.15 respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The behavioral approach improved catastrophizing and kinesiophobia outcomes in individuals with chronic TMDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"12-27"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Additional effects of therapeutic exercise and education on manual therapy for chronic temporomandibular disorders treatment: a randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Cristian Justribó-Manion, Juan Mesa-Jiménez, Javier Bara-Casaus, Juan-Carlos Zuil-Escobar, Katarzyna Wachowska, Gerard Álvarez-Bustins\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09593985.2024.2316305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have evaluated the implementation of behavioral approaches in individuals with chronic temporomandibular disorders (TMDs).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the benefits of a behavioral approach to craniofacial pain. Second, we assessed the benefits of kinesiophobia, catastrophizing, mouth opening without pain, and forward head posture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individuals with chronic TMDs were treated for five weeks. The intervention group (<i>n</i> = 17) underwent pain neuroscience education, manual therapy, and therapeutic exercise, whereas the control group (<i>n</i> = 17) underwent manual therapy only. Outcomes were evaluated immediately, at seven and 19 weeks follow-up. The assessment tools used were the Craniofacial Pain Disability Inventory, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, Mandibular Range of Motion Scale, and Cervical Range of Motion Tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The interventions did not influence the differences in the improvements between the groups observed for craniofacial pain disability (inter-subject p 0.4). The intervention had a moderate influence on the improvement of kinesiophobia and catastrophizing (Inter-subject p 0.09 and 0.1 respectively) with a clinically significant effect size (Estimated mean (EM) -8.6 standard deviation (SD) ±3.48 p 0.019; and EM -7.6 SD ± 5.11 p 0.15 respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The behavioral approach improved catastrophizing and kinesiophobia outcomes in individuals with chronic TMDs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"12-27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2024.2316305\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2024.2316305","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:先前的研究评估了行为疗法在慢性颞下颌关节紊乱症(TMD)患者中的应用情况:以往的研究评估了行为疗法在慢性颞下颌关节紊乱症(TMDs)患者中的应用情况:目的:评估行为疗法对颅面部疼痛的益处。其次,我们评估了运动恐惧、灾难化、无痛张口和头部前倾姿势的益处:方法:慢性 TMD 患者接受为期五周的治疗。干预组(n = 17)接受疼痛神经科学教育、手法治疗和治疗性运动,而对照组(n = 17)仅接受手法治疗。结果分别在随访 7 周和 19 周时进行评估。使用的评估工具包括颅面疼痛残疾量表、疼痛灾难化量表、坦帕运动恐惧症量表、下颌活动范围量表和颈椎活动范围工具:在颅面疼痛残疾方面,干预措施并不影响观察到的组间改善差异(受试者间差异为 0.4)。干预对运动恐惧和灾难化的改善有中等程度的影响(受试者间 p 分别为 0.09 和 0.1),其效应大小具有临床意义(估计平均值(EM)-8.6 标准差(SD)±3.48 p 0.019;EM-7.6 标准差(SD)±5.11 p 0.15):结论:行为疗法改善了慢性 TMD 患者的灾难化和运动恐惧结果。
Additional effects of therapeutic exercise and education on manual therapy for chronic temporomandibular disorders treatment: a randomized clinical trial.
Background: Previous studies have evaluated the implementation of behavioral approaches in individuals with chronic temporomandibular disorders (TMDs).
Objective: To evaluate the benefits of a behavioral approach to craniofacial pain. Second, we assessed the benefits of kinesiophobia, catastrophizing, mouth opening without pain, and forward head posture.
Methods: Individuals with chronic TMDs were treated for five weeks. The intervention group (n = 17) underwent pain neuroscience education, manual therapy, and therapeutic exercise, whereas the control group (n = 17) underwent manual therapy only. Outcomes were evaluated immediately, at seven and 19 weeks follow-up. The assessment tools used were the Craniofacial Pain Disability Inventory, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, Mandibular Range of Motion Scale, and Cervical Range of Motion Tool.
Results: The interventions did not influence the differences in the improvements between the groups observed for craniofacial pain disability (inter-subject p 0.4). The intervention had a moderate influence on the improvement of kinesiophobia and catastrophizing (Inter-subject p 0.09 and 0.1 respectively) with a clinically significant effect size (Estimated mean (EM) -8.6 standard deviation (SD) ±3.48 p 0.019; and EM -7.6 SD ± 5.11 p 0.15 respectively).
Conclusion: The behavioral approach improved catastrophizing and kinesiophobia outcomes in individuals with chronic TMDs.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.