Shuya Li, Runqi Wangqin, Yuesong Pan, Aoming Jin, Hao Li, Lee H Schwamm, Marc Fisher, Bruce C V Campbell, Mark W Parsons, Ziran Wang, Hongguo Dai, Deyang Li, Runhui Li, Junhai Wang, David Wang, Yilong Wang, Xingquan Zhao, Zixiao Li, Huaguang Zheng, Yunyun Xiong, Xia Meng, Yongjun Wang
{"title":"与急性缺血性脑卒中静脉注射替奈普酶治疗时间相关的结果:TRACE-2 随机对照临床试验的亚组分析。","authors":"Shuya Li, Runqi Wangqin, Yuesong Pan, Aoming Jin, Hao Li, Lee H Schwamm, Marc Fisher, Bruce C V Campbell, Mark W Parsons, Ziran Wang, Hongguo Dai, Deyang Li, Runhui Li, Junhai Wang, David Wang, Yilong Wang, Xingquan Zhao, Zixiao Li, Huaguang Zheng, Yunyun Xiong, Xia Meng, Yongjun Wang","doi":"10.1136/svn-2023-002694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The benefit of intravenous alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) is time-dependent. Tenecteplase is non-inferior to alteplase among patients with AIS. We aimed to delineate the association of the stroke onset to treatment time (OTT) with tenecteplase compared with alteplase on therapeutic benefit and clinical risks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a post hoc analysis of the Tenecteplase Reperfusion therapy in Acute ischaemic Cerebrovascular Events-2 an open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferior trial. A total of 1430 AIS within 4.5 hours onset at 53 sites in China from 12 June 2021 to 29 May 2022 were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg or alteplase 0.9 mg/kg. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of participants with a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1 at 90 days. A post hoc subgroup analysis was conducted with the OTT divided into three intervals (0-90 min, 91-180 min and 181-270 min). The primary safety outcome was symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage within 36 hours post-thrombolytic treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Treatment was initiated within 270 min of stroke onset in 1412 patients who were randomly allocated to either tenecteplase (n=707) or alteplase (n=705). The OR of primary efficacy outcome was similar as OTT increased (p=0.84). Adjusted odds of an excellent functional outcome were 0.99 (95% CI 0.37 to 2.67) for 0-90 min, 1.23 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.71) for 91-180 min and 1.21 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.65) for 181-270 min. All were in favour of the tenecteplase group. Meta-analysis of 2949 patients yielded a pooled risk difference of 5.54 (95% CI -0.18 to 11.26; p=0.82) in favour of tenecteplase for more than 180 min and 1.77 (95% CI -2.66 to 6.20; p=0.58) for 0-180 min.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In AIS patients who were treated with either tenecteplase or alteplase within 4.5 hours onset, there was no difference observed in the efficacy and safety between the two groups at the three different OTT time intervals.</p>","PeriodicalId":48733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes associated to the time to treatment with intravenous tenecteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: subgroup analysis of the TRACE-2 randomised controlled clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Shuya Li, Runqi Wangqin, Yuesong Pan, Aoming Jin, Hao Li, Lee H Schwamm, Marc Fisher, Bruce C V Campbell, Mark W Parsons, Ziran Wang, Hongguo Dai, Deyang Li, Runhui Li, Junhai Wang, David Wang, Yilong Wang, Xingquan Zhao, Zixiao Li, Huaguang Zheng, Yunyun Xiong, Xia Meng, Yongjun Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/svn-2023-002694\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The benefit of intravenous alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) is time-dependent. Tenecteplase is non-inferior to alteplase among patients with AIS. We aimed to delineate the association of the stroke onset to treatment time (OTT) with tenecteplase compared with alteplase on therapeutic benefit and clinical risks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a post hoc analysis of the Tenecteplase Reperfusion therapy in Acute ischaemic Cerebrovascular Events-2 an open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferior trial. A total of 1430 AIS within 4.5 hours onset at 53 sites in China from 12 June 2021 to 29 May 2022 were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg or alteplase 0.9 mg/kg. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of participants with a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1 at 90 days. A post hoc subgroup analysis was conducted with the OTT divided into three intervals (0-90 min, 91-180 min and 181-270 min). The primary safety outcome was symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage within 36 hours post-thrombolytic treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Treatment was initiated within 270 min of stroke onset in 1412 patients who were randomly allocated to either tenecteplase (n=707) or alteplase (n=705). The OR of primary efficacy outcome was similar as OTT increased (p=0.84). Adjusted odds of an excellent functional outcome were 0.99 (95% CI 0.37 to 2.67) for 0-90 min, 1.23 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.71) for 91-180 min and 1.21 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.65) for 181-270 min. All were in favour of the tenecteplase group. Meta-analysis of 2949 patients yielded a pooled risk difference of 5.54 (95% CI -0.18 to 11.26; p=0.82) in favour of tenecteplase for more than 180 min and 1.77 (95% CI -2.66 to 6.20; p=0.58) for 0-180 min.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In AIS patients who were treated with either tenecteplase or alteplase within 4.5 hours onset, there was no difference observed in the efficacy and safety between the two groups at the three different OTT time intervals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Investigative Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Investigative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2023-002694\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2023-002694","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:静脉注射阿替普酶治疗急性缺血性卒中(AIS)的疗效与时间有关。在 AIS 患者中,替奈普酶的疗效并不优于阿替普酶。我们旨在研究特奈替普酶与阿替普酶相比,中风发作到治疗时间(OTT)与治疗效果和临床风险之间的关系:这是对 "急性缺血性脑血管事件中的替奈普酶再灌注疗法-2"(Tenecteplase Reperfusion Therapy in Acute ischaemic Cerebrovascular Events-2 an open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferior trial)的事后分析。2021年6月12日至2022年5月29日期间,中国53个地点共1430名发病4.5小时内的急性缺血性脑血管事件患者被随机分配(1:1)接受替奈普酶0.25毫克/千克或阿替普酶0.9毫克/千克治疗。主要疗效指标是90天后改良Rankin量表评分为0-1分的参与者比例。进行了一项事后分组分析,将OTT分为三个时间段(0-90分钟、91-180分钟和181-270分钟)。主要安全性结果是溶栓治疗后 36 小时内出现症状性颅内出血:结果:1412名患者在中风发生后270分钟内开始治疗,随机分配到替奈普酶(707人)或阿替普酶(705人)。随着OTT的增加,主要疗效结果的OR值相似(p=0.84)。0-90分钟、91-180分钟和181-270分钟的调整后优良功能结果几率分别为0.99(95% CI 0.37至2.67)、1.23(95% CI 0.88至1.71)和1.21(95% CI 0.88至1.65)。所有结果均有利于替奈普酶组。对2949名患者进行的元分析显示,180分钟以上使用替奈替普酶组的风险差异为5.54(95% CI -0.18至11.26;P=0.82),0-180分钟使用替奈替普酶组的风险差异为1.77(95% CI -2.66至6.20;P=0.58):在发病4.5小时内接受替奈普酶或阿替普酶治疗的AIS患者中,观察到两组患者在三个不同的OTT时间间隔内的疗效和安全性没有差异。
Outcomes associated to the time to treatment with intravenous tenecteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: subgroup analysis of the TRACE-2 randomised controlled clinical trial.
Background: The benefit of intravenous alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) is time-dependent. Tenecteplase is non-inferior to alteplase among patients with AIS. We aimed to delineate the association of the stroke onset to treatment time (OTT) with tenecteplase compared with alteplase on therapeutic benefit and clinical risks.
Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of the Tenecteplase Reperfusion therapy in Acute ischaemic Cerebrovascular Events-2 an open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferior trial. A total of 1430 AIS within 4.5 hours onset at 53 sites in China from 12 June 2021 to 29 May 2022 were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg or alteplase 0.9 mg/kg. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of participants with a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1 at 90 days. A post hoc subgroup analysis was conducted with the OTT divided into three intervals (0-90 min, 91-180 min and 181-270 min). The primary safety outcome was symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage within 36 hours post-thrombolytic treatment.
Results: Treatment was initiated within 270 min of stroke onset in 1412 patients who were randomly allocated to either tenecteplase (n=707) or alteplase (n=705). The OR of primary efficacy outcome was similar as OTT increased (p=0.84). Adjusted odds of an excellent functional outcome were 0.99 (95% CI 0.37 to 2.67) for 0-90 min, 1.23 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.71) for 91-180 min and 1.21 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.65) for 181-270 min. All were in favour of the tenecteplase group. Meta-analysis of 2949 patients yielded a pooled risk difference of 5.54 (95% CI -0.18 to 11.26; p=0.82) in favour of tenecteplase for more than 180 min and 1.77 (95% CI -2.66 to 6.20; p=0.58) for 0-180 min.
Conclusions: In AIS patients who were treated with either tenecteplase or alteplase within 4.5 hours onset, there was no difference observed in the efficacy and safety between the two groups at the three different OTT time intervals.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Investigative Medicine (JIM) is the official publication of the American Federation for Medical Research. The journal is peer-reviewed and publishes high-quality original articles and reviews in the areas of basic, clinical, and translational medical research.
JIM publishes on all topics and specialty areas that are critical to the conduct of the entire spectrum of biomedical research: from the translation of clinical observations at the bedside, to basic and animal research to clinical research and the implementation of innovative medical care.