使用 PAH-SYMPACT 评估与慢性肺病相关的肺动脉高压患者的生活质量。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Pulmonary Circulation Pub Date : 2024-02-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1002/pul2.12343
Morgan E Bailey, Louise Durst, Hector R Cajigas, Garvan C Kane, Michael J Krowka, Sudhir S Kushwaha, Robert B McCully, Joseph G Murphy, Yogesh N Reddy, Robert P Frantz, Hilary M DuBrock
{"title":"使用 PAH-SYMPACT 评估与慢性肺病相关的肺动脉高压患者的生活质量。","authors":"Morgan E Bailey, Louise Durst, Hector R Cajigas, Garvan C Kane, Michael J Krowka, Sudhir S Kushwaha, Robert B McCully, Joseph G Murphy, Yogesh N Reddy, Robert P Frantz, Hilary M DuBrock","doi":"10.1002/pul2.12343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic lung disease (CLD) is the second leading cause of pulmonary hypertension (PH) and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Although PH associated with CLD (PH-CLD) leads to impaired health-related quality of life (HRQOL), there are no validated tools to assess HRQOL in PH-CLD. The Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-Symptoms and Impact Questionnaire (PAH-SYMPACT) is an HRQOL instrument aimed at assessing the symptoms and impact of PH on overall function and well-being. We performed a single-center prospective cohort study using PAH-SYMPACT scores to compare symptoms, exercise capacity and HRQOL in patients with PAH and PH-CLD. One hundred and twenty-five patients (99 patients with idiopathic/heritable PAH and 26 with PH-CLD) completed the PAH-SYMPACT questionnaire which consists of 22 questions that assess HRQOL across four domains: cardiopulmonary (CP) symptoms, cardiovascular (CV) symptoms, physical impact (PI), and cognitive/emotional (CE) impact. Higher scores indicate worse HRQOL. We compared patients with PAH and PH-CLD using a Wilcoxon rank sum or chi-squared test as appropriate. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between PH classification and SYMPACT scores. Compared to PAH, patients with PH-CLD were older, more likely to use oxygen and had worse functional class and exercise capacity. While there was no significant difference between the two groups in CP, CV, or CE domain scores, patients with PH-CLD had significantly worse PI scores by univariate (1.79 vs. 1.13, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and multivariate analysis (1.61 vs. 1.17, <i>p</i> = 0.02) and overall worse SYMPACT scores (1.19 vs. 0.91, <i>p</i> = 0.03). In conclusion, patients with PH-CLD have worse HRQOL as assessed by the PAH-SYMPACT questionnaire versus patients with PAH. Although PAH-SYMPACT has not been validated in PH-CLD, the results of this study can guide clinicians in understanding the symptoms and impact of PH-CLD relative to PAH.</p>","PeriodicalId":20927,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Circulation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10858736/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using PAH-SYMPACT to assess quality of life in patients with pulmonary hypertension associated with chronic lung disease.\",\"authors\":\"Morgan E Bailey, Louise Durst, Hector R Cajigas, Garvan C Kane, Michael J Krowka, Sudhir S Kushwaha, Robert B McCully, Joseph G Murphy, Yogesh N Reddy, Robert P Frantz, Hilary M DuBrock\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pul2.12343\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Chronic lung disease (CLD) is the second leading cause of pulmonary hypertension (PH) and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Although PH associated with CLD (PH-CLD) leads to impaired health-related quality of life (HRQOL), there are no validated tools to assess HRQOL in PH-CLD. The Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-Symptoms and Impact Questionnaire (PAH-SYMPACT) is an HRQOL instrument aimed at assessing the symptoms and impact of PH on overall function and well-being. We performed a single-center prospective cohort study using PAH-SYMPACT scores to compare symptoms, exercise capacity and HRQOL in patients with PAH and PH-CLD. One hundred and twenty-five patients (99 patients with idiopathic/heritable PAH and 26 with PH-CLD) completed the PAH-SYMPACT questionnaire which consists of 22 questions that assess HRQOL across four domains: cardiopulmonary (CP) symptoms, cardiovascular (CV) symptoms, physical impact (PI), and cognitive/emotional (CE) impact. Higher scores indicate worse HRQOL. We compared patients with PAH and PH-CLD using a Wilcoxon rank sum or chi-squared test as appropriate. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between PH classification and SYMPACT scores. Compared to PAH, patients with PH-CLD were older, more likely to use oxygen and had worse functional class and exercise capacity. While there was no significant difference between the two groups in CP, CV, or CE domain scores, patients with PH-CLD had significantly worse PI scores by univariate (1.79 vs. 1.13, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and multivariate analysis (1.61 vs. 1.17, <i>p</i> = 0.02) and overall worse SYMPACT scores (1.19 vs. 0.91, <i>p</i> = 0.03). In conclusion, patients with PH-CLD have worse HRQOL as assessed by the PAH-SYMPACT questionnaire versus patients with PAH. Although PAH-SYMPACT has not been validated in PH-CLD, the results of this study can guide clinicians in understanding the symptoms and impact of PH-CLD relative to PAH.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pulmonary Circulation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10858736/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pulmonary Circulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pul2.12343\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pul2.12343","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

慢性肺病(CLD)是导致肺动脉高压(PH)的第二大原因,并与严重的发病率和死亡率相关。虽然与慢性肺病相关的肺动脉高压(PH-CLD)会导致健康相关的生活质量(HRQOL)受损,但目前还没有有效的工具来评估 PH-CLD 的 HRQOL。肺动脉高压症状和影响问卷(PAH-SYMPACT)是一种 HRQOL 工具,旨在评估 PH 的症状及其对整体功能和幸福感的影响。我们进行了一项单中心前瞻性队列研究,使用 PAH-SYMPACT 评分比较 PAH 和 PH-CLD 患者的症状、运动能力和 HRQOL。125名患者(99名特发性/遗传性PAH患者和26名PH-CLD患者)完成了PAH-SYMPACT问卷调查,该问卷由22个问题组成,可评估四个领域的HRQOL:心肺(CP)症状、心血管(CV)症状、身体影响(PI)和认知/情感(CE)影响。得分越高表明 HRQOL 越差。我们酌情使用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验或卡方检验对 PAH 和 PH-CLD 患者进行了比较。多变量线性回归分析用于评估 PH 分类与 SYMPACT 评分之间的关系。与 PAH 相比,PH-CLD 患者年龄更大,更有可能使用氧气,功能分级和运动能力更差。虽然两组患者在 CP、CV 或 CE 领域的评分没有明显差异,但 PH-CLD 患者的单变量 PI 评分(1.79 vs. 1.13,P = 0.02)和总体 SYMPACT 评分(1.19 vs. 0.91,P = 0.03)明显较差。总之,通过 PAH-SYMPACT 问卷评估,PH-CLD 患者的 HRQOL 比 PAH 患者更差。虽然 PAH-SYMPACT 尚未在 PH-CLD 中得到验证,但本研究的结果可以指导临床医生了解 PH-CLD 相对于 PAH 的症状和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using PAH-SYMPACT to assess quality of life in patients with pulmonary hypertension associated with chronic lung disease.

Chronic lung disease (CLD) is the second leading cause of pulmonary hypertension (PH) and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Although PH associated with CLD (PH-CLD) leads to impaired health-related quality of life (HRQOL), there are no validated tools to assess HRQOL in PH-CLD. The Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-Symptoms and Impact Questionnaire (PAH-SYMPACT) is an HRQOL instrument aimed at assessing the symptoms and impact of PH on overall function and well-being. We performed a single-center prospective cohort study using PAH-SYMPACT scores to compare symptoms, exercise capacity and HRQOL in patients with PAH and PH-CLD. One hundred and twenty-five patients (99 patients with idiopathic/heritable PAH and 26 with PH-CLD) completed the PAH-SYMPACT questionnaire which consists of 22 questions that assess HRQOL across four domains: cardiopulmonary (CP) symptoms, cardiovascular (CV) symptoms, physical impact (PI), and cognitive/emotional (CE) impact. Higher scores indicate worse HRQOL. We compared patients with PAH and PH-CLD using a Wilcoxon rank sum or chi-squared test as appropriate. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between PH classification and SYMPACT scores. Compared to PAH, patients with PH-CLD were older, more likely to use oxygen and had worse functional class and exercise capacity. While there was no significant difference between the two groups in CP, CV, or CE domain scores, patients with PH-CLD had significantly worse PI scores by univariate (1.79 vs. 1.13, p < 0.001) and multivariate analysis (1.61 vs. 1.17, p = 0.02) and overall worse SYMPACT scores (1.19 vs. 0.91, p = 0.03). In conclusion, patients with PH-CLD have worse HRQOL as assessed by the PAH-SYMPACT questionnaire versus patients with PAH. Although PAH-SYMPACT has not been validated in PH-CLD, the results of this study can guide clinicians in understanding the symptoms and impact of PH-CLD relative to PAH.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pulmonary Circulation
Pulmonary Circulation Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
153
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Pulmonary Circulation''s main goal is to encourage basic, translational, and clinical research by investigators, physician-scientists, and clinicans, in the hope of increasing survival rates for pulmonary hypertension and other pulmonary vascular diseases worldwide, and developing new therapeutic approaches for the diseases. Freely available online, Pulmonary Circulation allows diverse knowledge of research, techniques, and case studies to reach a wide readership of specialists in order to improve patient care and treatment outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信