利用深度神经网络,通过急诊和急救护理的标准化医院数据预测住院时间。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-12 DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000001975
Vincent Lequertier, Tao Wang, Julien Fondrevelle, Vincent Augusto, Stéphanie Polazzi, Antoine Duclos
{"title":"利用深度神经网络,通过急诊和急救护理的标准化医院数据预测住院时间。","authors":"Vincent Lequertier, Tao Wang, Julien Fondrevelle, Vincent Augusto, Stéphanie Polazzi, Antoine Duclos","doi":"10.1097/MLR.0000000000001975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Length of stay (LOS) is an important metric for the organization and scheduling of care activities. This study sought to propose a LOS prediction method based on deep learning using widely available administrative data from acute and emergency care and compare it with other methods.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>All admissions between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2019, at 6 university hospitals of the Hospices Civils de Lyon metropolis were included, leading to a cohort of 1,140,100 stays of 515,199 patients. Data included demographics, primary and associated diagnoses, medical procedures, the medical unit, the admission type, socio-economic factors, and temporal information. A model based on embeddings and a Feed-Forward Neural Network (FFNN) was developed to provide fine-grained LOS predictions per hospitalization step. Performances were compared with random forest and logistic regression, with the accuracy, Cohen kappa, and a Bland-Altman plot, through a 5-fold cross-validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FFNN achieved an accuracy of 0.944 (CI: 0.937, 0.950) and a kappa of 0.943 (CI: 0.935, 0.950). For the same metrics, random forest yielded 0.574 (CI: 0.573, 0.575) and 0.602 (CI: 0.601, 0.603), respectively, and 0.352 (CI: 0.346, 0.358) and 0.414 (CI: 0.408, 0.422) for the logistic regression. The FFNN had a limit of agreement ranging from -2.73 to 2.67, which was better than random forest (-6.72 to 6.83) or logistic regression (-7.60 to 9.20).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The FFNN was better at predicting LOS than random forest or logistic regression. Implementing the FFNN model for routine acute care could be useful for improving the quality of patients' care.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Length of Stay Prediction With Standardized Hospital Data From Acute and Emergency Care Using a Deep Neural Network.\",\"authors\":\"Vincent Lequertier, Tao Wang, Julien Fondrevelle, Vincent Augusto, Stéphanie Polazzi, Antoine Duclos\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MLR.0000000000001975\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Length of stay (LOS) is an important metric for the organization and scheduling of care activities. This study sought to propose a LOS prediction method based on deep learning using widely available administrative data from acute and emergency care and compare it with other methods.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>All admissions between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2019, at 6 university hospitals of the Hospices Civils de Lyon metropolis were included, leading to a cohort of 1,140,100 stays of 515,199 patients. Data included demographics, primary and associated diagnoses, medical procedures, the medical unit, the admission type, socio-economic factors, and temporal information. A model based on embeddings and a Feed-Forward Neural Network (FFNN) was developed to provide fine-grained LOS predictions per hospitalization step. Performances were compared with random forest and logistic regression, with the accuracy, Cohen kappa, and a Bland-Altman plot, through a 5-fold cross-validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FFNN achieved an accuracy of 0.944 (CI: 0.937, 0.950) and a kappa of 0.943 (CI: 0.935, 0.950). For the same metrics, random forest yielded 0.574 (CI: 0.573, 0.575) and 0.602 (CI: 0.601, 0.603), respectively, and 0.352 (CI: 0.346, 0.358) and 0.414 (CI: 0.408, 0.422) for the logistic regression. The FFNN had a limit of agreement ranging from -2.73 to 2.67, which was better than random forest (-6.72 to 6.83) or logistic regression (-7.60 to 9.20).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The FFNN was better at predicting LOS than random forest or logistic regression. Implementing the FFNN model for routine acute care could be useful for improving the quality of patients' care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001975\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001975","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:住院时间(LOS)是组织和安排护理活动的一个重要指标。本研究试图提出一种基于深度学习的住院时间预测方法,该方法使用了广泛可用的急诊护理管理数据,并与其他方法进行了比较:研究纳入了 2011 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日期间里昂市安宁医院下属 6 所大学医院的所有住院病例,共纳入了 515 199 名患者的 1140 100 次住院。数据包括人口统计学、主要诊断和相关诊断、医疗程序、医疗单位、入院类型、社会经济因素和时间信息。我们开发了一个基于嵌入和前馈神经网络(FFNN)的模型,以提供每个住院步骤的细粒度 LOS 预测。通过 5 倍交叉验证,比较了随机森林和逻辑回归的准确性、Cohen kappa 和 Bland-Altman 图:FFNN的准确率为0.944(CI:0.937,0.950),卡帕值为0.943(CI:0.935,0.950)。对于相同的指标,随机森林的结果分别为 0.574(CI:0.573,0.575)和 0.602(CI:0.601,0.603),逻辑回归的结果分别为 0.352(CI:0.346,0.358)和 0.414(CI:0.408,0.422)。FFNN 的一致性极限为-2.73 至 2.67,优于随机森林(-6.72 至 6.83)或逻辑回归(-7.60 至 9.20):结论:FFNN 在预测 LOS 方面优于随机森林或逻辑回归。在常规急诊护理中采用 FFNN 模型有助于提高患者的护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Length of Stay Prediction With Standardized Hospital Data From Acute and Emergency Care Using a Deep Neural Network.

Objective: Length of stay (LOS) is an important metric for the organization and scheduling of care activities. This study sought to propose a LOS prediction method based on deep learning using widely available administrative data from acute and emergency care and compare it with other methods.

Patients and methods: All admissions between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2019, at 6 university hospitals of the Hospices Civils de Lyon metropolis were included, leading to a cohort of 1,140,100 stays of 515,199 patients. Data included demographics, primary and associated diagnoses, medical procedures, the medical unit, the admission type, socio-economic factors, and temporal information. A model based on embeddings and a Feed-Forward Neural Network (FFNN) was developed to provide fine-grained LOS predictions per hospitalization step. Performances were compared with random forest and logistic regression, with the accuracy, Cohen kappa, and a Bland-Altman plot, through a 5-fold cross-validation.

Results: The FFNN achieved an accuracy of 0.944 (CI: 0.937, 0.950) and a kappa of 0.943 (CI: 0.935, 0.950). For the same metrics, random forest yielded 0.574 (CI: 0.573, 0.575) and 0.602 (CI: 0.601, 0.603), respectively, and 0.352 (CI: 0.346, 0.358) and 0.414 (CI: 0.408, 0.422) for the logistic regression. The FFNN had a limit of agreement ranging from -2.73 to 2.67, which was better than random forest (-6.72 to 6.83) or logistic regression (-7.60 to 9.20).

Conclusion: The FFNN was better at predicting LOS than random forest or logistic regression. Implementing the FFNN model for routine acute care could be useful for improving the quality of patients' care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信