基于社区的参与式研究 "农产品处方计划 "参与者的经历:定性研究的结果。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
American Journal of Health Promotion Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-12 DOI:10.1177/08901171241233094
Courtney Kimi Suh, Abigail Huliganga, Jeriann Collymore, Naomi Desai, Mary Mora, Lena Hatchett
{"title":"基于社区的参与式研究 \"农产品处方计划 \"参与者的经历:定性研究的结果。","authors":"Courtney Kimi Suh, Abigail Huliganga, Jeriann Collymore, Naomi Desai, Mary Mora, Lena Hatchett","doi":"10.1177/08901171241233094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to explore a food-insecure, low income, predominantly African American community's experiences with a produce prescription program (PPP).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Researchers conducted 3 focus groups and 4 individual interviews with Maywood Veggie Rx (VRxM) participants asking questions about the logistics of the program while also exploring ideas around health, food, and community.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This produce prescription program took place in Maywood, Illinois which is an urban underserved community with 23.5 K people, most of whom are Black/African American (61%) and Hispanic (32%).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The 24 participants interviewed through focus groups and individual interviews were enrolled in the 2021-2022 VRxM program. Participants were mainly female, with only three participants being males. Ages ranged between 34 and 74 years of age with a mean age of 56.3.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Qualitative data from transcripts were then coded via a grounded theory approach to identify common themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A research team of seven including the two Co-PIs, three medical students and two dietetic interns identified 278 codes which were then condensed into 117 codes and then placed into 9 categories. Researchers identified three recurrent themes among the experiences of VRxM participants: (1) trust building, (2) culturally relevant and adaptive nutrition education, and (3) bidirectional feedback. These three themes mirror many of the principles of Community Based Participatory Research (CBPR).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study findings identify common themes among the experiences of VRxM which are in line with the collaborative approach of CBPR principles. Produce Prescription Programs should utilize CBPR principles in the creation and implementation of programming to improve the participant experience. Future research should include additional focus groups on new iterations of VRxM and should also include those people who chose not to participate in VRxM to explore barriers to participation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Participants' Experiences With a Community Based Participatory Research Produce Prescription Program: Findings From a Qualitative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Courtney Kimi Suh, Abigail Huliganga, Jeriann Collymore, Naomi Desai, Mary Mora, Lena Hatchett\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08901171241233094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to explore a food-insecure, low income, predominantly African American community's experiences with a produce prescription program (PPP).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Researchers conducted 3 focus groups and 4 individual interviews with Maywood Veggie Rx (VRxM) participants asking questions about the logistics of the program while also exploring ideas around health, food, and community.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This produce prescription program took place in Maywood, Illinois which is an urban underserved community with 23.5 K people, most of whom are Black/African American (61%) and Hispanic (32%).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The 24 participants interviewed through focus groups and individual interviews were enrolled in the 2021-2022 VRxM program. Participants were mainly female, with only three participants being males. Ages ranged between 34 and 74 years of age with a mean age of 56.3.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Qualitative data from transcripts were then coded via a grounded theory approach to identify common themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A research team of seven including the two Co-PIs, three medical students and two dietetic interns identified 278 codes which were then condensed into 117 codes and then placed into 9 categories. Researchers identified three recurrent themes among the experiences of VRxM participants: (1) trust building, (2) culturally relevant and adaptive nutrition education, and (3) bidirectional feedback. These three themes mirror many of the principles of Community Based Participatory Research (CBPR).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study findings identify common themes among the experiences of VRxM which are in line with the collaborative approach of CBPR principles. Produce Prescription Programs should utilize CBPR principles in the creation and implementation of programming to improve the participant experience. Future research should include additional focus groups on new iterations of VRxM and should also include those people who chose not to participate in VRxM to explore barriers to participation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Health Promotion\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Health Promotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171241233094\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171241233094","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在探讨一个食物无保障、低收入、以非洲裔美国人为主的社区在农产品处方计划(PPP)方面的经验:设计:研究人员与梅伍德蔬菜处方(VRxM)的参与者进行了 3 次焦点小组讨论和 4 次个人访谈,询问有关该计划的后勤问题,同时探讨有关健康、食品和社区的想法:这项农产品处方计划在伊利诺伊州梅伍德开展,梅伍德是一个服务不足的城市社区,有 23.5 万人口,其中大部分是黑人/非洲裔美国人(61%)和西班牙裔美国人(32%):通过焦点小组和个别访谈访谈的 24 名参与者参加了 2021-2022 年 VRxM 计划。参与者以女性为主,只有 3 名男性。年龄在 34 至 74 岁之间,平均年龄为 56.3 岁:3.方法:然后通过基础理论方法对记录誊本中的定性数据进行编码,以确定共同的主题:由包括两名共同首席研究员、三名医科学生和两名营养学实习生在内的七人组成的研究小组确定了 278 个编码,然后将其浓缩为 117 个编码,并归入 9 个类别。研究人员在 VRxM 参与者的经历中发现了三个重复出现的主题:(1) 建立信任,(2) 文化相关性和适应性营养教育,(3) 双向反馈。这三个主题反映了社区参与式研究(CBPR)的许多原则:研究结果确定了 VRxM 经验中的共同主题,这些主题符合 CBPR 原则中的合作方法。生产处方计划在创建和实施计划时应利用 CBPR 原则,以改善参与者的体验。未来的研究应包括更多关于 VRxM 新迭代的焦点小组,还应包括那些选择不参与 VRxM 的人,以探索参与的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Participants' Experiences With a Community Based Participatory Research Produce Prescription Program: Findings From a Qualitative Study.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore a food-insecure, low income, predominantly African American community's experiences with a produce prescription program (PPP).

Design: Researchers conducted 3 focus groups and 4 individual interviews with Maywood Veggie Rx (VRxM) participants asking questions about the logistics of the program while also exploring ideas around health, food, and community.

Setting: This produce prescription program took place in Maywood, Illinois which is an urban underserved community with 23.5 K people, most of whom are Black/African American (61%) and Hispanic (32%).

Participants: The 24 participants interviewed through focus groups and individual interviews were enrolled in the 2021-2022 VRxM program. Participants were mainly female, with only three participants being males. Ages ranged between 34 and 74 years of age with a mean age of 56.3.

Method: Qualitative data from transcripts were then coded via a grounded theory approach to identify common themes.

Results: A research team of seven including the two Co-PIs, three medical students and two dietetic interns identified 278 codes which were then condensed into 117 codes and then placed into 9 categories. Researchers identified three recurrent themes among the experiences of VRxM participants: (1) trust building, (2) culturally relevant and adaptive nutrition education, and (3) bidirectional feedback. These three themes mirror many of the principles of Community Based Participatory Research (CBPR).

Conclusion: The study findings identify common themes among the experiences of VRxM which are in line with the collaborative approach of CBPR principles. Produce Prescription Programs should utilize CBPR principles in the creation and implementation of programming to improve the participant experience. Future research should include additional focus groups on new iterations of VRxM and should also include those people who chose not to participate in VRxM to explore barriers to participation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Health Promotion
American Journal of Health Promotion PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The editorial goal of the American Journal of Health Promotion is to provide a forum for exchange among the many disciplines involved in health promotion and an interface between researchers and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信