Núria Visa-Reñé, Adriana Rubio-Páez, Núria Mitjans-Rubies, Fernando Paredes-Carmona
{"title":"儿科患者 MIS-C 与潜在严重感染之间的血浆炎症生物标志物比较。","authors":"Núria Visa-Reñé, Adriana Rubio-Páez, Núria Mitjans-Rubies, Fernando Paredes-Carmona","doi":"10.1016/j.reumae.2024.01.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Inflammatory biomarkers have been used for the diagnosis and management of multisystemic inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). We aimed to compare the clinical and laboratory findings of MIS-C cases versus other febrile cases cataloged as potentially suspected bacterial infection (non-MIS-C).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Unicentric ambispective observational cohort study (June 2020–February 2022). We analyzed demographics, clinical symptoms and laboratory findings in MIS-C cases and in non-MIS-C cases with febrile processes of patients under 15 years of age admitted to hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We enrolled 54 patients with potential suspected bacterial infection and 20 patients with MIS-C for analysis. Fever (100%), gastrointestinal (80%) and mucocutaneous findings (35%) were common in MIS-C patients, also hypotension (36.8%) and tachycardia (55%). Laboratory findings showed significantly elevated proBNP (70%), ferritin (35%), D-dimer (80%) and lymphopenia (55%) and thrombocytopenia (27.8%) in MIS-C cases. IL-6 values were high in non-MIS-C patients (92.6%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In the management of MIS‐C patients, the dynamic monitoring of proBNP, ferritin, D-dimer, lymphocytes and platelets could be helpful to pediatricians to effectively evaluate the progress of MIS‐C in the early phases, not IL-6 values. The applicability of the IL-6 level as a prognostic biomarker in MIS-C patients may require closer discussion. In addition, the optimal laboratory markers, as stated in our study, can help establish a biomarkers model to early distinguish the MIS-C versus non-MIS-C in patients who are admitted to febrile syndrome.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94193,"journal":{"name":"Reumatologia clinica","volume":"20 2","pages":"Pages 84-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of plasma inflammatory biomarkers between MIS-C and potentially serious infections in pediatric patients\",\"authors\":\"Núria Visa-Reñé, Adriana Rubio-Páez, Núria Mitjans-Rubies, Fernando Paredes-Carmona\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.reumae.2024.01.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Inflammatory biomarkers have been used for the diagnosis and management of multisystemic inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). We aimed to compare the clinical and laboratory findings of MIS-C cases versus other febrile cases cataloged as potentially suspected bacterial infection (non-MIS-C).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Unicentric ambispective observational cohort study (June 2020–February 2022). We analyzed demographics, clinical symptoms and laboratory findings in MIS-C cases and in non-MIS-C cases with febrile processes of patients under 15 years of age admitted to hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We enrolled 54 patients with potential suspected bacterial infection and 20 patients with MIS-C for analysis. Fever (100%), gastrointestinal (80%) and mucocutaneous findings (35%) were common in MIS-C patients, also hypotension (36.8%) and tachycardia (55%). Laboratory findings showed significantly elevated proBNP (70%), ferritin (35%), D-dimer (80%) and lymphopenia (55%) and thrombocytopenia (27.8%) in MIS-C cases. IL-6 values were high in non-MIS-C patients (92.6%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In the management of MIS‐C patients, the dynamic monitoring of proBNP, ferritin, D-dimer, lymphocytes and platelets could be helpful to pediatricians to effectively evaluate the progress of MIS‐C in the early phases, not IL-6 values. The applicability of the IL-6 level as a prognostic biomarker in MIS-C patients may require closer discussion. In addition, the optimal laboratory markers, as stated in our study, can help establish a biomarkers model to early distinguish the MIS-C versus non-MIS-C in patients who are admitted to febrile syndrome.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reumatologia clinica\",\"volume\":\"20 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 84-91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reumatologia clinica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173574324000200\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reumatologia clinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173574324000200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of plasma inflammatory biomarkers between MIS-C and potentially serious infections in pediatric patients
Background
Inflammatory biomarkers have been used for the diagnosis and management of multisystemic inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). We aimed to compare the clinical and laboratory findings of MIS-C cases versus other febrile cases cataloged as potentially suspected bacterial infection (non-MIS-C).
Methods
Unicentric ambispective observational cohort study (June 2020–February 2022). We analyzed demographics, clinical symptoms and laboratory findings in MIS-C cases and in non-MIS-C cases with febrile processes of patients under 15 years of age admitted to hospital.
Results
We enrolled 54 patients with potential suspected bacterial infection and 20 patients with MIS-C for analysis. Fever (100%), gastrointestinal (80%) and mucocutaneous findings (35%) were common in MIS-C patients, also hypotension (36.8%) and tachycardia (55%). Laboratory findings showed significantly elevated proBNP (70%), ferritin (35%), D-dimer (80%) and lymphopenia (55%) and thrombocytopenia (27.8%) in MIS-C cases. IL-6 values were high in non-MIS-C patients (92.6%).
Conclusions
In the management of MIS‐C patients, the dynamic monitoring of proBNP, ferritin, D-dimer, lymphocytes and platelets could be helpful to pediatricians to effectively evaluate the progress of MIS‐C in the early phases, not IL-6 values. The applicability of the IL-6 level as a prognostic biomarker in MIS-C patients may require closer discussion. In addition, the optimal laboratory markers, as stated in our study, can help establish a biomarkers model to early distinguish the MIS-C versus non-MIS-C in patients who are admitted to febrile syndrome.