优化 LQR 控制器:比较研究

Q3 Mathematics
Sanjay Joseph Chacko , Neeraj P.C. , Rajesh Joseph Abraham
{"title":"优化 LQR 控制器:比较研究","authors":"Sanjay Joseph Chacko ,&nbsp;Neeraj P.C. ,&nbsp;Rajesh Joseph Abraham","doi":"10.1016/j.rico.2024.100387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Linear Quadratic Regulator is one of the most common ways to control a linear system. Despite Linear Quadratic Regulator’s (LQR) strong performance and solid resilience, developing these controllers have been challenging, largely because there is no reliable way to choose the <span><math><mi>Q</mi></math></span> and <span><math><mi>R</mi></math></span> weighing matrices. In this regard a deterministic method is used for choosing them in this paper, providing the designers a precise control over performance variables. An Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) optimisation is also used to find the sub-optimal gain matrices along with an analytical approach based on neural networks. A comparative study of the three approaches is performed using MATLAB simulations. These three approaches are applied on an inverted pendulum–cart system due to its complexity and dexterity. The results show that all the three methods show comparable performances with the proposed analytical method being slightly better in terms of transient characteristics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34733,"journal":{"name":"Results in Control and Optimization","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100387"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666720724000171/pdfft?md5=73aba1c28b1ab24f0aeefaf53de0975b&pid=1-s2.0-S2666720724000171-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing LQR controllers: A comparative study\",\"authors\":\"Sanjay Joseph Chacko ,&nbsp;Neeraj P.C. ,&nbsp;Rajesh Joseph Abraham\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rico.2024.100387\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Linear Quadratic Regulator is one of the most common ways to control a linear system. Despite Linear Quadratic Regulator’s (LQR) strong performance and solid resilience, developing these controllers have been challenging, largely because there is no reliable way to choose the <span><math><mi>Q</mi></math></span> and <span><math><mi>R</mi></math></span> weighing matrices. In this regard a deterministic method is used for choosing them in this paper, providing the designers a precise control over performance variables. An Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) optimisation is also used to find the sub-optimal gain matrices along with an analytical approach based on neural networks. A comparative study of the three approaches is performed using MATLAB simulations. These three approaches are applied on an inverted pendulum–cart system due to its complexity and dexterity. The results show that all the three methods show comparable performances with the proposed analytical method being slightly better in terms of transient characteristics.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Results in Control and Optimization\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100387\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666720724000171/pdfft?md5=73aba1c28b1ab24f0aeefaf53de0975b&pid=1-s2.0-S2666720724000171-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Results in Control and Optimization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666720724000171\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Results in Control and Optimization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666720724000171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

线性二次调节器是控制线性系统最常用的方法之一。尽管线性二次调节器(LQR)具有强大的性能和稳固的弹性,但开发这些控制器一直是一项挑战,主要是因为没有可靠的方法来选择 Q 和 R 权重矩阵。为此,本文采用了一种确定性方法来选择它们,为设计人员提供了对性能变量的精确控制。人工蜂群(ABC)优化法和基于神经网络的分析方法也用于寻找次优增益矩阵。通过 MATLAB 仿真对这三种方法进行了比较研究。由于倒立摆-小车系统的复杂性和灵巧性,这三种方法都被应用于该系统。结果表明,这三种方法的性能相当,而所提出的分析方法在瞬态特性方面略胜一筹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimizing LQR controllers: A comparative study

Linear Quadratic Regulator is one of the most common ways to control a linear system. Despite Linear Quadratic Regulator’s (LQR) strong performance and solid resilience, developing these controllers have been challenging, largely because there is no reliable way to choose the Q and R weighing matrices. In this regard a deterministic method is used for choosing them in this paper, providing the designers a precise control over performance variables. An Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) optimisation is also used to find the sub-optimal gain matrices along with an analytical approach based on neural networks. A comparative study of the three approaches is performed using MATLAB simulations. These three approaches are applied on an inverted pendulum–cart system due to its complexity and dexterity. The results show that all the three methods show comparable performances with the proposed analytical method being slightly better in terms of transient characteristics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Results in Control and Optimization
Results in Control and Optimization Mathematics-Control and Optimization
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
91 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信