目标导向液体疗法对肾移植受者移植功能延迟的影响:系统回顾与荟萃分析。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Michael P. Klonarakis , Mannat Dhillon , Emir Sevinc , Meghan J. Elliott , Matthew T. James , Ngan N. Lam , Kevin J. McLaughlin , Paul E. Ronksley , Shannon M. Ruzycki , Tyrone G. Harrison
{"title":"目标导向液体疗法对肾移植受者移植功能延迟的影响:系统回顾与荟萃分析。","authors":"Michael P. Klonarakis ,&nbsp;Mannat Dhillon ,&nbsp;Emir Sevinc ,&nbsp;Meghan J. Elliott ,&nbsp;Matthew T. James ,&nbsp;Ngan N. Lam ,&nbsp;Kevin J. McLaughlin ,&nbsp;Paul E. Ronksley ,&nbsp;Shannon M. Ruzycki ,&nbsp;Tyrone G. Harrison","doi":"10.1016/j.trre.2024.100834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common post-operative complication with potential long-term sequelae for many kidney transplant recipients, and hemodynamic factors and fluid status play a role. Fixed perioperative fluid infusions are the standard of care, but more recent evidence in the non-transplant population has suggested benefit with goal-directed fluid strategies based on hemodynamic targets. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Controlled Trials Registry and Google Scholar through December 2022 for randomized controlled trials comparing risk of DGF between goal-directed and conventional fluid therapy in adults receiving a living or deceased donor kidney transplant. Effect estimates were reported with odds ratios (OR) and pooled using random effects meta-analysis. We identified 4 studies (205 participants) that met the inclusion criteria. The use of goal-directed fluid therapy had no significant effect on DGF (OR 1.37 95% CI, 0.34–5.6; <em>p</em> = 0.52; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.11). Subgroup analysis examining effects among deceased and living kidney donation did not reveal significant differences in the effects of fluid strategy on DGF between subgroups. Overall, the strength of the evidence for goal-directed versus conventional fluid therapy to reduce DGF was of low certainty. Our findings highlight the need for larger trials to determine the effect of goal-directed fluid therapy on this patient-centered outcome.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48973,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Reviews","volume":"38 2","pages":"Article 100834"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955470X2400017X/pdfft?md5=1d194adabec20ab884a91886e2d974d8&pid=1-s2.0-S0955470X2400017X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of goal-directed fluid therapy on delayed graft function in kidney transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Michael P. Klonarakis ,&nbsp;Mannat Dhillon ,&nbsp;Emir Sevinc ,&nbsp;Meghan J. Elliott ,&nbsp;Matthew T. James ,&nbsp;Ngan N. Lam ,&nbsp;Kevin J. McLaughlin ,&nbsp;Paul E. Ronksley ,&nbsp;Shannon M. Ruzycki ,&nbsp;Tyrone G. Harrison\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trre.2024.100834\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common post-operative complication with potential long-term sequelae for many kidney transplant recipients, and hemodynamic factors and fluid status play a role. Fixed perioperative fluid infusions are the standard of care, but more recent evidence in the non-transplant population has suggested benefit with goal-directed fluid strategies based on hemodynamic targets. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Controlled Trials Registry and Google Scholar through December 2022 for randomized controlled trials comparing risk of DGF between goal-directed and conventional fluid therapy in adults receiving a living or deceased donor kidney transplant. Effect estimates were reported with odds ratios (OR) and pooled using random effects meta-analysis. We identified 4 studies (205 participants) that met the inclusion criteria. The use of goal-directed fluid therapy had no significant effect on DGF (OR 1.37 95% CI, 0.34–5.6; <em>p</em> = 0.52; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.11). Subgroup analysis examining effects among deceased and living kidney donation did not reveal significant differences in the effects of fluid strategy on DGF between subgroups. Overall, the strength of the evidence for goal-directed versus conventional fluid therapy to reduce DGF was of low certainty. Our findings highlight the need for larger trials to determine the effect of goal-directed fluid therapy on this patient-centered outcome.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation Reviews\",\"volume\":\"38 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100834\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955470X2400017X/pdfft?md5=1d194adabec20ab884a91886e2d974d8&pid=1-s2.0-S0955470X2400017X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955470X2400017X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955470X2400017X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

移植物功能延迟(DGF)是一种常见的术后并发症,对许多肾移植受者来说可能会造成长期后遗症,而血液动力学因素和输液状态在其中起到了一定的作用。固定的围手术期输液是护理的标准,但最近在非移植人群中出现的证据表明,根据血流动力学目标采取目标导向的输液策略是有益的。我们检索了截至 2022 年 12 月的 MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane 对照试验注册中心和谷歌学术,以寻找在接受活体或死体肾移植的成人中比较目标导向和常规输液疗法的 DGF 风险的随机对照试验。用几率比 (OR) 报告效果估计值,并使用随机效应荟萃分析进行汇总。我们发现有 4 项研究(205 名参与者)符合纳入标准。使用目标导向液体疗法对 DGF 没有显著影响(OR 1.37 95% CI, 0.34-5.6; p = 0.52; I2 = 0.11)。对已故肾脏捐献者和活体肾脏捐献者的影响进行的亚组分析表明,输液策略对 DGF 的影响在不同亚组之间没有明显差异。总体而言,目标导向输液疗法与常规输液疗法在降低 DGF 方面的证据确定性较低。我们的研究结果突出表明,有必要进行更大规模的试验,以确定目标导向输液疗法对这一以患者为中心的结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of goal-directed fluid therapy on delayed graft function in kidney transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common post-operative complication with potential long-term sequelae for many kidney transplant recipients, and hemodynamic factors and fluid status play a role. Fixed perioperative fluid infusions are the standard of care, but more recent evidence in the non-transplant population has suggested benefit with goal-directed fluid strategies based on hemodynamic targets. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Controlled Trials Registry and Google Scholar through December 2022 for randomized controlled trials comparing risk of DGF between goal-directed and conventional fluid therapy in adults receiving a living or deceased donor kidney transplant. Effect estimates were reported with odds ratios (OR) and pooled using random effects meta-analysis. We identified 4 studies (205 participants) that met the inclusion criteria. The use of goal-directed fluid therapy had no significant effect on DGF (OR 1.37 95% CI, 0.34–5.6; p = 0.52; I2 = 0.11). Subgroup analysis examining effects among deceased and living kidney donation did not reveal significant differences in the effects of fluid strategy on DGF between subgroups. Overall, the strength of the evidence for goal-directed versus conventional fluid therapy to reduce DGF was of low certainty. Our findings highlight the need for larger trials to determine the effect of goal-directed fluid therapy on this patient-centered outcome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transplantation Reviews
Transplantation Reviews IMMUNOLOGY-TRANSPLANTATION
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
40
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: Transplantation Reviews contains state-of-the-art review articles on both clinical and experimental transplantation. The journal features invited articles by authorities in immunology, transplantation medicine and surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信