Antonio Martín Andrés, Francisco Gayá Moreno, María Álvarez Hernández, Inmaculada Herranz Tejedor
{"title":"米特宁和努尔米宁分数统计再探。","authors":"Antonio Martín Andrés, Francisco Gayá Moreno, María Álvarez Hernández, Inmaculada Herranz Tejedor","doi":"10.1080/10543406.2024.2311242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is commonly necessary to perform inferences on the difference, ratio, and odds ratio of two proportions <i>p</i><sub><i>1</i></sub> and <i>p</i><sub><i>2</i></sub> based on two independent samples. For this purpose, the most common asymptotic statistics are based on the score statistics (<i>S</i>-type statistics). As these do not correct the bias of the estimator of the product <i>p</i><sub><i>i</i></sub> (1-<i>p</i><sub><i>i</i></sub>), Miettinen and Nurminen proposed the <i>MN</i>-type statistics, which consist of multiplying the statistics <i>S</i> by (<i>N</i>-1)/<i>N</i>, where <i>N</i> is the sum of the two sample sizes. This paper demonstrates that the factor (<i>N</i>-1)/<i>N</i> is only correct in the case of the test of equality of two proportions, providing the estimation of the correct factor (<i>AU</i>-type statistics) and the minimum value of the same (<i>AUM-</i>type statistics). Moreover, this paper assesses the performance of the four-type statistics mentioned (<i>S</i>, <i>MN</i>, <i>AU</i> and <i>AUM</i>) in one and two-tailed tests, and for each of the three parameters cited (<i>d</i>, <i>R</i> and <i>OR</i>). We found that the <i>AUM-</i>type statistics are the best, followed by the <i>MN</i> type (whose performance was most similar to that of <i>AU-</i>type). Finally, this paper also provides the correct factors when the data are from a multinomial distribution, with the novelty that the <i>MN</i> and AU statistics are similar in the case of the test for the odds ratio.</p>","PeriodicalId":54870,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics","volume":" ","pages":"283-296"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Miettinen and Nurminen score statistics revisited.\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Martín Andrés, Francisco Gayá Moreno, María Álvarez Hernández, Inmaculada Herranz Tejedor\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10543406.2024.2311242\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>It is commonly necessary to perform inferences on the difference, ratio, and odds ratio of two proportions <i>p</i><sub><i>1</i></sub> and <i>p</i><sub><i>2</i></sub> based on two independent samples. For this purpose, the most common asymptotic statistics are based on the score statistics (<i>S</i>-type statistics). As these do not correct the bias of the estimator of the product <i>p</i><sub><i>i</i></sub> (1-<i>p</i><sub><i>i</i></sub>), Miettinen and Nurminen proposed the <i>MN</i>-type statistics, which consist of multiplying the statistics <i>S</i> by (<i>N</i>-1)/<i>N</i>, where <i>N</i> is the sum of the two sample sizes. This paper demonstrates that the factor (<i>N</i>-1)/<i>N</i> is only correct in the case of the test of equality of two proportions, providing the estimation of the correct factor (<i>AU</i>-type statistics) and the minimum value of the same (<i>AUM-</i>type statistics). Moreover, this paper assesses the performance of the four-type statistics mentioned (<i>S</i>, <i>MN</i>, <i>AU</i> and <i>AUM</i>) in one and two-tailed tests, and for each of the three parameters cited (<i>d</i>, <i>R</i> and <i>OR</i>). We found that the <i>AUM-</i>type statistics are the best, followed by the <i>MN</i> type (whose performance was most similar to that of <i>AU-</i>type). Finally, this paper also provides the correct factors when the data are from a multinomial distribution, with the novelty that the <i>MN</i> and AU statistics are similar in the case of the test for the odds ratio.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"283-296\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2024.2311242\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2024.2311242","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
通常需要根据两个独立样本对两个比例 p1 和 p2 的差值、比率和几率进行推断。为此,最常用的渐近统计是基于分数统计(S 型统计)。由于这些统计量不能纠正乘积 pi (1-pi) 估计数的偏差,Miettinen 和 Nurminen 提出了 MN 型统计量,即用统计量 S 乘以 (N-1)/N,其中 N 是两个样本量的总和。本文证明了 (N-1)/N 因子只在两个比例相等的检验中才是正确的,并提供了正确因子(AU 型统计量)和相同最小值(AUM 型统计量)的估计。此外,本文还评估了上述四种类型统计量(S、MN、AU 和 AUM)在单尾和双尾检验中的性能,并分别评估了上述三个参数(d、R 和 OR)的性能。我们发现 AUM 型统计量最好,其次是 MN 型(其性能与 AU 型最为相似)。最后,本文还提供了当数据来自多二项分布时的正确因子,其新颖之处在于,在检验几率比时,MN 和 AU 统计量是相似的。
Miettinen and Nurminen score statistics revisited.
It is commonly necessary to perform inferences on the difference, ratio, and odds ratio of two proportions p1 and p2 based on two independent samples. For this purpose, the most common asymptotic statistics are based on the score statistics (S-type statistics). As these do not correct the bias of the estimator of the product pi (1-pi), Miettinen and Nurminen proposed the MN-type statistics, which consist of multiplying the statistics S by (N-1)/N, where N is the sum of the two sample sizes. This paper demonstrates that the factor (N-1)/N is only correct in the case of the test of equality of two proportions, providing the estimation of the correct factor (AU-type statistics) and the minimum value of the same (AUM-type statistics). Moreover, this paper assesses the performance of the four-type statistics mentioned (S, MN, AU and AUM) in one and two-tailed tests, and for each of the three parameters cited (d, R and OR). We found that the AUM-type statistics are the best, followed by the MN type (whose performance was most similar to that of AU-type). Finally, this paper also provides the correct factors when the data are from a multinomial distribution, with the novelty that the MN and AU statistics are similar in the case of the test for the odds ratio.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, a rapid publication journal, discusses quality applications of statistics in biopharmaceutical research and development. Now publishing six times per year, it includes expositions of statistical methodology with immediate applicability to biopharmaceutical research in the form of full-length and short manuscripts, review articles, selected/invited conference papers, short articles, and letters to the editor. Addressing timely and provocative topics important to the biostatistical profession, the journal covers:
Drug, device, and biological research and development;
Drug screening and drug design;
Assessment of pharmacological activity;
Pharmaceutical formulation and scale-up;
Preclinical safety assessment;
Bioavailability, bioequivalence, and pharmacokinetics;
Phase, I, II, and III clinical development including complex innovative designs;
Premarket approval assessment of clinical safety;
Postmarketing surveillance;
Big data and artificial intelligence and applications.