Emmerson Chivhenge, David G. Ray, Aaron R. Weiskittel, Christopher W. Woodall, Anthony W. D’Amato
{"title":"评估林分密度指数在复杂和适应性强的森林管理中的开发和应用","authors":"Emmerson Chivhenge, David G. Ray, Aaron R. Weiskittel, Christopher W. Woodall, Anthony W. D’Amato","doi":"10.1007/s40725-024-00212-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose of Review</h3><p>The objective quantification of stand density (SD) is necessary for predicting forest dynamics over space and time. Despite the development of various synthetic representations of SD, consensus remains elusive regarding a primary integrated measure due to contrasting data sources, statistical modeling methods, and distinct regional variations in forest structure and composition. One of the most enduring and robust measures of SD is Reineke’s (1933; J. Ag Res. 46, 627-638) stand density index (SDI), which has long formed the basis for the prediction of stand development concerning self-thinning processes in single-species, even-aged stands and stand density management diagrams (SDMDs). Thus, this review tracks the development of different methodologies and necessary data for properly estimating SDI, including its application in complex forests and adaptive management contexts.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Recent Findings</h3><p>Limitations of SDI in its earliest form have led to important modifications centered on refinement and expanding its application beyond even-aged, single-species stands to multi-cohort, mixed composition stands. Statistical advances for better determination of the maximum size-density boundary line have also been applied to SDI estimates using the ever-expanding availability of remeasured field data including large-scale, national forest inventories. Other innovations include the integration of regional climate information and species functional traits, e.g., wood specific gravity, drought, and shade tolerance.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Summary</h3><p>In this synthesis, we describe the attributes of SDI that have promulgated its use as a leading measure of SD for nearly 90 years. Recent applications of robust statistical techniques such as hierarchical Bayesian methods and linear quantile mixed modeling have emerged as the best performing methods for establishing the maximum size-density boundary, especially those incorporating ancillary variables like climate.</p>","PeriodicalId":48653,"journal":{"name":"Current Forestry Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Development and Application of Stand Density Index for the Management of Complex and Adaptive Forests\",\"authors\":\"Emmerson Chivhenge, David G. Ray, Aaron R. Weiskittel, Christopher W. Woodall, Anthony W. D’Amato\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40725-024-00212-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Purpose of Review</h3><p>The objective quantification of stand density (SD) is necessary for predicting forest dynamics over space and time. Despite the development of various synthetic representations of SD, consensus remains elusive regarding a primary integrated measure due to contrasting data sources, statistical modeling methods, and distinct regional variations in forest structure and composition. One of the most enduring and robust measures of SD is Reineke’s (1933; J. Ag Res. 46, 627-638) stand density index (SDI), which has long formed the basis for the prediction of stand development concerning self-thinning processes in single-species, even-aged stands and stand density management diagrams (SDMDs). Thus, this review tracks the development of different methodologies and necessary data for properly estimating SDI, including its application in complex forests and adaptive management contexts.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Recent Findings</h3><p>Limitations of SDI in its earliest form have led to important modifications centered on refinement and expanding its application beyond even-aged, single-species stands to multi-cohort, mixed composition stands. Statistical advances for better determination of the maximum size-density boundary line have also been applied to SDI estimates using the ever-expanding availability of remeasured field data including large-scale, national forest inventories. Other innovations include the integration of regional climate information and species functional traits, e.g., wood specific gravity, drought, and shade tolerance.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Summary</h3><p>In this synthesis, we describe the attributes of SDI that have promulgated its use as a leading measure of SD for nearly 90 years. Recent applications of robust statistical techniques such as hierarchical Bayesian methods and linear quantile mixed modeling have emerged as the best performing methods for establishing the maximum size-density boundary, especially those incorporating ancillary variables like climate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Forestry Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Forestry Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-024-00212-w\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Forestry Reports","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-024-00212-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating the Development and Application of Stand Density Index for the Management of Complex and Adaptive Forests
Purpose of Review
The objective quantification of stand density (SD) is necessary for predicting forest dynamics over space and time. Despite the development of various synthetic representations of SD, consensus remains elusive regarding a primary integrated measure due to contrasting data sources, statistical modeling methods, and distinct regional variations in forest structure and composition. One of the most enduring and robust measures of SD is Reineke’s (1933; J. Ag Res. 46, 627-638) stand density index (SDI), which has long formed the basis for the prediction of stand development concerning self-thinning processes in single-species, even-aged stands and stand density management diagrams (SDMDs). Thus, this review tracks the development of different methodologies and necessary data for properly estimating SDI, including its application in complex forests and adaptive management contexts.
Recent Findings
Limitations of SDI in its earliest form have led to important modifications centered on refinement and expanding its application beyond even-aged, single-species stands to multi-cohort, mixed composition stands. Statistical advances for better determination of the maximum size-density boundary line have also been applied to SDI estimates using the ever-expanding availability of remeasured field data including large-scale, national forest inventories. Other innovations include the integration of regional climate information and species functional traits, e.g., wood specific gravity, drought, and shade tolerance.
Summary
In this synthesis, we describe the attributes of SDI that have promulgated its use as a leading measure of SD for nearly 90 years. Recent applications of robust statistical techniques such as hierarchical Bayesian methods and linear quantile mixed modeling have emerged as the best performing methods for establishing the maximum size-density boundary, especially those incorporating ancillary variables like climate.
Current Forestry ReportsAgricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
2.10%
发文量
22
期刊介绍:
Current Forestry Reports features in-depth review articles written by global experts on significant advancements in forestry. Its goal is to provide clear, insightful, and balanced contributions that highlight and summarize important topics for forestry researchers and managers.
To achieve this, the journal appoints international authorities as Section Editors in various key subject areas like physiological processes, tree genetics, forest management, remote sensing, and wood structure and function. These Section Editors select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that focus on new developments and recently published papers of great importance. Moreover, an international Editorial Board evaluates the yearly table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their specific country or region, and ensures that the topics are up-to-date and include emerging research.