调查《国家卫生从业人员管理法》规定的调查权力。

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW
Journal of Law and Medicine Pub Date : 2023-12-01
Chris Corns
{"title":"调查《国家卫生从业人员管理法》规定的调查权力。","authors":"Chris Corns","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Investigators and inspectors appointed under the Australia Health Practitioner Regulation National Law play important roles by gathering and assessing evidence used in disciplinary proceedings and/or criminal prosecutions. In performing these roles, investigators and inspectors exercise \"police-like\" powers including coercive questioning and entry onto private property with or without a search warrant. The investigation process can add additional stress and anxiety for health practitioners who are subject to disciplinary proceedings. It is difficult for an aggrieved party to challenge the lawfulness of the exercise of an investigation power in a tribunal as tribunals lack jurisdiction to rule on the legality of an investigation power or the admissibility of evidence. This article explores the range of powers possessed by investigators and inspectors under the National Law and a number of issues relating to the exercise of those powers.</p>","PeriodicalId":45522,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Medicine","volume":"30 3","pages":"673-689"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating Investigation Powers under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law.\",\"authors\":\"Chris Corns\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Investigators and inspectors appointed under the Australia Health Practitioner Regulation National Law play important roles by gathering and assessing evidence used in disciplinary proceedings and/or criminal prosecutions. In performing these roles, investigators and inspectors exercise \\\"police-like\\\" powers including coercive questioning and entry onto private property with or without a search warrant. The investigation process can add additional stress and anxiety for health practitioners who are subject to disciplinary proceedings. It is difficult for an aggrieved party to challenge the lawfulness of the exercise of an investigation power in a tribunal as tribunals lack jurisdiction to rule on the legality of an investigation power or the admissibility of evidence. This article explores the range of powers possessed by investigators and inspectors under the National Law and a number of issues relating to the exercise of those powers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Law and Medicine\",\"volume\":\"30 3\",\"pages\":\"673-689\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Law and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据《澳大利亚卫生从业人员管理国家法》任命的调查员和检查员在收集和评估用于纪律处分程序和/或刑事诉讼的证据方面发挥着重要作用。在履行这些职责时,调查员和检查员会行使 "类似警察 "的权力,包括强制询问和在有或没有搜查证的情况下进入私人住宅。调查过程会给受到纪律处分的医疗从业人员增加额外的压力和焦虑。受害方很难在法庭上质疑行使调查权的合法性,因为法庭无权裁定调查权的合法性或证据的可采性。本文探讨了《国家法》赋予调查员和检查员的一系列权力,以及与行使这些权力有关的一些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating Investigation Powers under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law.

Investigators and inspectors appointed under the Australia Health Practitioner Regulation National Law play important roles by gathering and assessing evidence used in disciplinary proceedings and/or criminal prosecutions. In performing these roles, investigators and inspectors exercise "police-like" powers including coercive questioning and entry onto private property with or without a search warrant. The investigation process can add additional stress and anxiety for health practitioners who are subject to disciplinary proceedings. It is difficult for an aggrieved party to challenge the lawfulness of the exercise of an investigation power in a tribunal as tribunals lack jurisdiction to rule on the legality of an investigation power or the admissibility of evidence. This article explores the range of powers possessed by investigators and inspectors under the National Law and a number of issues relating to the exercise of those powers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信