在荷兰多中心队列中使用快速护理点测试评估 GFAP 和 UCH-L1,以预测轻度脑外伤后的头部计算机断层扫描病变。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of neurotrauma Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-28 DOI:10.1089/neu.2023.0491
Walid Chayoua, Koen Visser, Myrthe E de Koning, Albertus Beishuizen, Rein IJmker, Joukje van der Naalt, Johannes G Krabbe, Harm Jan van der Horn
{"title":"在荷兰多中心队列中使用快速护理点测试评估 GFAP 和 UCH-L1,以预测轻度脑外伤后的头部计算机断层扫描病变。","authors":"Walid Chayoua, Koen Visser, Myrthe E de Koning, Albertus Beishuizen, Rein IJmker, Joukje van der Naalt, Johannes G Krabbe, Harm Jan van der Horn","doi":"10.1089/neu.2023.0491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a common condition seen in emergency departments worldwide. Blood-based biomarkers glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) are recently U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved for the prediction of intracranial lesions on head computed tomography (CT) scans in mTBI. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of GFAP and UCH-L1 in a Dutch cohort using the i-STAT TBI assay. In a multi-center observational study, we enrolled 253 mTBI patients. Head CT scans were scored using the Marshall classification system. Logistic regression models were used to assess the contribution of biomarkers and clinical parameters to diagnostic performance. Detection of UCH-L1 and GFAP resulted in a sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 19% for CT positivity in mTBI patients, along with a negative predictive value of 95% (88-100%) and a positive predictive value of 27% (21-33%). Combining biomarker testing with loss of consciousness and time to sample increased specificity to 46%. Combined testing of UCH-L1 and GFAP testing resulted in possibly more unnecessary CT scans compared with GFAP testing alone, with only limited increase in sensitivity. This study confirmed high sensitivity of GFAP and UCH-L1 for CT abnormalities in mTBI patients using the i-STAT TBI test. The results support the potential use of GFAP and UCH-L1 as tools for determining the indication for CT scanning in mTBI patients, possibly offering a cost- and time-effective approach to management of patients with mTBI. Prospective studies in larger cohorts are warranted to validate our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurotrauma","volume":" ","pages":"e1630-e1640"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein and Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase-L1 Using a Rapid Point of Care Test for Predicting Head Computed Tomography Lesions After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in a Dutch Multi-Center Cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Walid Chayoua, Koen Visser, Myrthe E de Koning, Albertus Beishuizen, Rein IJmker, Joukje van der Naalt, Johannes G Krabbe, Harm Jan van der Horn\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/neu.2023.0491\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a common condition seen in emergency departments worldwide. Blood-based biomarkers glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) are recently U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved for the prediction of intracranial lesions on head computed tomography (CT) scans in mTBI. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of GFAP and UCH-L1 in a Dutch cohort using the i-STAT TBI assay. In a multi-center observational study, we enrolled 253 mTBI patients. Head CT scans were scored using the Marshall classification system. Logistic regression models were used to assess the contribution of biomarkers and clinical parameters to diagnostic performance. Detection of UCH-L1 and GFAP resulted in a sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 19% for CT positivity in mTBI patients, along with a negative predictive value of 95% (88-100%) and a positive predictive value of 27% (21-33%). Combining biomarker testing with loss of consciousness and time to sample increased specificity to 46%. Combined testing of UCH-L1 and GFAP testing resulted in possibly more unnecessary CT scans compared with GFAP testing alone, with only limited increase in sensitivity. This study confirmed high sensitivity of GFAP and UCH-L1 for CT abnormalities in mTBI patients using the i-STAT TBI test. The results support the potential use of GFAP and UCH-L1 as tools for determining the indication for CT scanning in mTBI patients, possibly offering a cost- and time-effective approach to management of patients with mTBI. Prospective studies in larger cohorts are warranted to validate our findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurotrauma\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e1630-e1640\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurotrauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2023.0491\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurotrauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2023.0491","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)是全球急诊科常见的一种疾病。基于血液的生物标记物胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)和泛素 C 端水解酶-L1(UCH-L1)最近获得了美国食品药品管理局(FDA)的批准,用于预测轻度脑损伤患者头部计算机断层扫描(CT)中的颅内病变。我们使用 i-STAT TBI 检测法评估了荷兰队列中 GFAP 和 UCH-L1 的诊断性能:在一项多中心观察研究中,我们招募了 253 名 mTBI 患者。采用马歇尔分类系统对头部 CT 扫描进行评分。采用逻辑回归模型评估生物标志物和临床参数对诊断效果的贡献:UCH-L1和GFAP的检测结果显示,mTBI患者CT阳性的敏感性为97%,特异性为19%,阴性预测值为95%(88%-100%),阳性预测值为27%(21%-33%)。将生物标记物检测与意识丧失(LOC)和采样时间相结合,可将特异性提高到 46%。与单独检测GFAP相比,UCH-L1和GFAP联合检测可能会导致更多不必要的CT扫描,但灵敏度增加有限:本研究证实,使用 i-STAT TBI 测试,GFAP 和 UCH-L1 对 mTBI 患者 CT 异常的灵敏度很高。研究结果支持将 GFAP 和 UCH-L1 用作确定 mTBI 患者 CT 扫描适应症的工具,这可能会为 mTBI 患者的管理提供一种成本低、时间短的有效方法。为了验证我们的研究结果,有必要进行更大规模的前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein and Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase-L1 Using a Rapid Point of Care Test for Predicting Head Computed Tomography Lesions After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in a Dutch Multi-Center Cohort.

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a common condition seen in emergency departments worldwide. Blood-based biomarkers glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) are recently U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved for the prediction of intracranial lesions on head computed tomography (CT) scans in mTBI. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of GFAP and UCH-L1 in a Dutch cohort using the i-STAT TBI assay. In a multi-center observational study, we enrolled 253 mTBI patients. Head CT scans were scored using the Marshall classification system. Logistic regression models were used to assess the contribution of biomarkers and clinical parameters to diagnostic performance. Detection of UCH-L1 and GFAP resulted in a sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 19% for CT positivity in mTBI patients, along with a negative predictive value of 95% (88-100%) and a positive predictive value of 27% (21-33%). Combining biomarker testing with loss of consciousness and time to sample increased specificity to 46%. Combined testing of UCH-L1 and GFAP testing resulted in possibly more unnecessary CT scans compared with GFAP testing alone, with only limited increase in sensitivity. This study confirmed high sensitivity of GFAP and UCH-L1 for CT abnormalities in mTBI patients using the i-STAT TBI test. The results support the potential use of GFAP and UCH-L1 as tools for determining the indication for CT scanning in mTBI patients, possibly offering a cost- and time-effective approach to management of patients with mTBI. Prospective studies in larger cohorts are warranted to validate our findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurotrauma
Journal of neurotrauma 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
233
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Neurotrauma is the flagship, peer-reviewed publication for reporting on the latest advances in both the clinical and laboratory investigation of traumatic brain and spinal cord injury. The Journal focuses on the basic pathobiology of injury to the central nervous system, while considering preclinical and clinical trials targeted at improving both the early management and long-term care and recovery of traumatically injured patients. This is the essential journal publishing cutting-edge basic and translational research in traumatically injured human and animal studies, with emphasis on neurodegenerative disease research linked to CNS trauma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信