Juan Luis Valdivieso-Shephard, Elisabet Matas-Pérez, Silvia García-Bujalance, Isabel Mirones-Aguilar, Berta González-Martínez, Antonio Pérez-Martínez, Eduardo López-Granados, Ana Martínez-Feito, Elena Sánchez-Zapardiel
{"title":"实现 CAR-T 细胞监测标准化的挑战:两种流式细胞计数法的比较及与 qPCR 技术的相关性。","authors":"Juan Luis Valdivieso-Shephard, Elisabet Matas-Pérez, Silvia García-Bujalance, Isabel Mirones-Aguilar, Berta González-Martínez, Antonio Pérez-Martínez, Eduardo López-Granados, Ana Martínez-Feito, Elena Sánchez-Zapardiel","doi":"10.1002/cyto.a.24825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a breakthrough in hematologic malignancies, such as acute B lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Monitoring this treatment is recommended, although standardized protocols have not been developed yet. This work compares two flow cytometry monitoring strategies and correlates this technique with qPCR method. CAR-T cells were detected by two different flow-cytometry protocols (A and B) in nine blood samples from one healthy donor and five B-ALL patients treated with Tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah®, USA). HIV-1 viral load allowed CAR detection by qPCR, using samples from seven healthy donors and nine B-ALL patients. CAR detection by protocol A and B did not yield statistically significant differences (1.9% vs. 11.8% CD3 + CAR+, <i>p</i> = 0.07). However, protocol B showed a better discrimination of the CD3 + CAR+ population. A strong correlation was observed between protocol B and qPCR (<i>r</i> = 0.7, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). CD3 + CAR+ cells were detected by flow cytometry only when HIV-1 viral load was above 10<sup>4</sup> copies/mL. In conclusion, protocol B was the most specific flow-cytometry procedure for the identification of CAR-T cells and showed a high correlation with qPCR. Further efforts are needed to achieve a standardized monitoring approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":11068,"journal":{"name":"Cytometry Part A","volume":"105 5","pages":"368-375"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The challenge of standardizing CAR-T cell monitoring: A comparison of two flow-cytometry methods and correlation with qPCR technique\",\"authors\":\"Juan Luis Valdivieso-Shephard, Elisabet Matas-Pérez, Silvia García-Bujalance, Isabel Mirones-Aguilar, Berta González-Martínez, Antonio Pérez-Martínez, Eduardo López-Granados, Ana Martínez-Feito, Elena Sánchez-Zapardiel\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cyto.a.24825\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a breakthrough in hematologic malignancies, such as acute B lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Monitoring this treatment is recommended, although standardized protocols have not been developed yet. This work compares two flow cytometry monitoring strategies and correlates this technique with qPCR method. CAR-T cells were detected by two different flow-cytometry protocols (A and B) in nine blood samples from one healthy donor and five B-ALL patients treated with Tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah®, USA). HIV-1 viral load allowed CAR detection by qPCR, using samples from seven healthy donors and nine B-ALL patients. CAR detection by protocol A and B did not yield statistically significant differences (1.9% vs. 11.8% CD3 + CAR+, <i>p</i> = 0.07). However, protocol B showed a better discrimination of the CD3 + CAR+ population. A strong correlation was observed between protocol B and qPCR (<i>r</i> = 0.7, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). CD3 + CAR+ cells were detected by flow cytometry only when HIV-1 viral load was above 10<sup>4</sup> copies/mL. In conclusion, protocol B was the most specific flow-cytometry procedure for the identification of CAR-T cells and showed a high correlation with qPCR. Further efforts are needed to achieve a standardized monitoring approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cytometry Part A\",\"volume\":\"105 5\",\"pages\":\"368-375\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cytometry Part A\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cyto.a.24825\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cytometry Part A","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cyto.a.24825","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T 细胞疗法是急性 B 淋巴细胞白血病(B-ALL)等血液系统恶性肿瘤的一大突破。尽管尚未制定标准化方案,但我们建议对这种疗法进行监测。这项研究比较了两种流式细胞仪监测策略,并将这一技术与 qPCR 方法进行了关联。通过两种不同的流式细胞术方案(A 和 B)检测了九份血液样本中的 CAR-T 细胞,这些血液样本分别来自一名健康捐献者和五名接受 Tisagenlecleucel(Kymriah®,美国)治疗的 B-ALL 患者。HIV-1 病毒载量允许通过 qPCR 检测 CAR,使用的样本来自 7 名健康捐献者和 9 名 B-ALL 患者。A 和 B 方案的 CAR 检测结果在统计学上没有显著差异(1.9% 对 11.8% CD3 + CAR+,p = 0.07)。不过,方案 B 对 CD3 + CAR+ 群体的分辨能力更强。在方案 B 和 qPCR 之间观察到了很强的相关性(r = 0.7,p 4 copies/mL)。总之,方案 B 是鉴定 CAR-T 细胞最特异的流式细胞术,与 qPCR 的相关性很高。要实现标准化的监测方法,还需要进一步的努力。
The challenge of standardizing CAR-T cell monitoring: A comparison of two flow-cytometry methods and correlation with qPCR technique
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a breakthrough in hematologic malignancies, such as acute B lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Monitoring this treatment is recommended, although standardized protocols have not been developed yet. This work compares two flow cytometry monitoring strategies and correlates this technique with qPCR method. CAR-T cells were detected by two different flow-cytometry protocols (A and B) in nine blood samples from one healthy donor and five B-ALL patients treated with Tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah®, USA). HIV-1 viral load allowed CAR detection by qPCR, using samples from seven healthy donors and nine B-ALL patients. CAR detection by protocol A and B did not yield statistically significant differences (1.9% vs. 11.8% CD3 + CAR+, p = 0.07). However, protocol B showed a better discrimination of the CD3 + CAR+ population. A strong correlation was observed between protocol B and qPCR (r = 0.7, p < 0.0001). CD3 + CAR+ cells were detected by flow cytometry only when HIV-1 viral load was above 104 copies/mL. In conclusion, protocol B was the most specific flow-cytometry procedure for the identification of CAR-T cells and showed a high correlation with qPCR. Further efforts are needed to achieve a standardized monitoring approach.
期刊介绍:
Cytometry Part A, the journal of quantitative single-cell analysis, features original research reports and reviews of innovative scientific studies employing quantitative single-cell measurement, separation, manipulation, and modeling techniques, as well as original articles on mechanisms of molecular and cellular functions obtained by cytometry techniques.
The journal welcomes submissions from multiple research fields that fully embrace the study of the cytome:
Biomedical Instrumentation Engineering
Biophotonics
Bioinformatics
Cell Biology
Computational Biology
Data Science
Immunology
Parasitology
Microbiology
Neuroscience
Cancer
Stem Cells
Tissue Regeneration.