吸收能力与能力陷阱:经验知识与新兴技术投资

IF 11.1 1区 管理学 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Wen Mu , Xu Jiang
{"title":"吸收能力与能力陷阱:经验知识与新兴技术投资","authors":"Wen Mu ,&nbsp;Xu Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2024.102973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Because of the radical novelty of emerging technologies, investing in such technologies brings high risk and great uncertainty. Whether investors’ experiential knowledge encourages or discourages investment in emerging technologies remains under investigation. Juxtaposing the “absorptive capacity” and “competency trap” perspectives, this study proposes a pair of competing hypotheses regarding the influence of experiential knowledge on investor decision-making in emerging technologies. Specifically, we contend that experiential knowledge stimulates investment in emerging technologies based on the absorptive capacity perspective. Meanwhile, drawing on the competency trap perspective, we also argue that experiential knowledge may discourage investment in emerging technologies. Empirical evidence from blockchain-related funding rounds reveals that experiential knowledge negatively influences investment in emerging technologies, which is consistent with the competency trap perspective. We also discover that investor reputation and investor status exacerbate the competency trap implications. Overall, this study sheds light on investment in emerging technologies, the theoretical dilemma of experiential learning, as well as decision-making under uncertainty and ambiguity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Absorptive capacity versus competency trap: Experiential knowledge and investment in emerging technologies\",\"authors\":\"Wen Mu ,&nbsp;Xu Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.technovation.2024.102973\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Because of the radical novelty of emerging technologies, investing in such technologies brings high risk and great uncertainty. Whether investors’ experiential knowledge encourages or discourages investment in emerging technologies remains under investigation. Juxtaposing the “absorptive capacity” and “competency trap” perspectives, this study proposes a pair of competing hypotheses regarding the influence of experiential knowledge on investor decision-making in emerging technologies. Specifically, we contend that experiential knowledge stimulates investment in emerging technologies based on the absorptive capacity perspective. Meanwhile, drawing on the competency trap perspective, we also argue that experiential knowledge may discourage investment in emerging technologies. Empirical evidence from blockchain-related funding rounds reveals that experiential knowledge negatively influences investment in emerging technologies, which is consistent with the competency trap perspective. We also discover that investor reputation and investor status exacerbate the competency trap implications. Overall, this study sheds light on investment in emerging technologies, the theoretical dilemma of experiential learning, as well as decision-making under uncertainty and ambiguity.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technovation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497224000233\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497224000233","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于新兴技术具有极强的新颖性,投资这类技术会带来高风险和极大的不确定性。投资者的经验知识是鼓励还是阻碍对新兴技术的投资,目前仍在研究之中。本研究将 "吸收能力 "和 "能力陷阱 "两种观点并列,就经验知识对新兴技术投资者决策的影响提出了一对相互竞争的假设。具体而言,我们认为,基于吸收能力视角,经验知识会刺激对新兴技术的投资。同时,借鉴能力陷阱的观点,我们也认为经验知识可能会阻碍对新兴技术的投资。区块链相关融资回合的经验证据显示,经验知识对新兴技术投资有负面影响,这与能力陷阱的观点一致。我们还发现,投资者声誉和投资者地位会加剧能力陷阱的影响。总之,本研究揭示了新兴技术投资、经验学习的理论困境以及不确定性和模糊性下的决策问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Absorptive capacity versus competency trap: Experiential knowledge and investment in emerging technologies

Because of the radical novelty of emerging technologies, investing in such technologies brings high risk and great uncertainty. Whether investors’ experiential knowledge encourages or discourages investment in emerging technologies remains under investigation. Juxtaposing the “absorptive capacity” and “competency trap” perspectives, this study proposes a pair of competing hypotheses regarding the influence of experiential knowledge on investor decision-making in emerging technologies. Specifically, we contend that experiential knowledge stimulates investment in emerging technologies based on the absorptive capacity perspective. Meanwhile, drawing on the competency trap perspective, we also argue that experiential knowledge may discourage investment in emerging technologies. Empirical evidence from blockchain-related funding rounds reveals that experiential knowledge negatively influences investment in emerging technologies, which is consistent with the competency trap perspective. We also discover that investor reputation and investor status exacerbate the competency trap implications. Overall, this study sheds light on investment in emerging technologies, the theoretical dilemma of experiential learning, as well as decision-making under uncertainty and ambiguity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Technovation
Technovation 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
11.20%
发文量
208
审稿时长
91 days
期刊介绍: The interdisciplinary journal Technovation covers various aspects of technological innovation, exploring processes, products, and social impacts. It examines innovation in both process and product realms, including social innovations like regulatory frameworks and non-economic benefits. Topics range from emerging trends and capital for development to managing technology-intensive ventures and innovation in organizations of different sizes. It also discusses organizational structures, investment strategies for science and technology enterprises, and the roles of technological innovators. Additionally, it addresses technology transfer between developing countries and innovation across enterprise, political, and economic systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信