支气管炎临床路径对首选语言管理决策的影响。

IF 1.2 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Pediatric quality & safety Pub Date : 2024-02-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1097/pq9.0000000000000714
Robert H Rosen, Michael C Monuteaux, Anne M Stack, Kenneth A Michelson, Andrew M Fine
{"title":"支气管炎临床路径对首选语言管理决策的影响。","authors":"Robert H Rosen, Michael C Monuteaux, Anne M Stack, Kenneth A Michelson, Andrew M Fine","doi":"10.1097/pq9.0000000000000714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical pathways standardize healthcare utilization, but their impact on healthcare equity is poorly understood. This study aims to measure the effect of a bronchiolitis pathway on management decisions by preferred language for care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included all emergency department encounters for patients aged 1-12 months with bronchiolitis from 1/1/2010 to 10/31/2020. The prepathway period ended 10/31/2011, and the postpathway period was 1/1/2012-10/31/2020. We performed retrospective interrupted time series analyses to assess the impact of the clinical pathway by English versus non-English preferred language on the following outcomes: chest radiography (CXR), albuterol use, 7-day return visit, 72-hour return to admission, antibiotic use, and corticosteroid use. Analyses were adjusted for presence of a complex chronic condition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 1485 encounters in the preperiod (77% English, 14% non-English, 8% missing) and 7840 encounters in the postperiod (79% English, 15% non-English, 6% missing). CXR, antibiotic, and albuterol utilization exhibited sustained decreases over the study period. Pathway impact did not differ by preferred language for any outcome except albuterol utilization. The prepost slope effect of albuterol utilization was 10% greater in the non-English versus the English group (p for the difference by language = 0.022).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A clinical pathway was associated with improvements in care regardless of preferred language. More extensive studies involving multiple pathways and care settings are needed to assess the impact of clinical pathways on health equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":74412,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric quality & safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10843310/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of a Bronchiolitis Clinical Pathway on Management Decisions by Preferred Language.\",\"authors\":\"Robert H Rosen, Michael C Monuteaux, Anne M Stack, Kenneth A Michelson, Andrew M Fine\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/pq9.0000000000000714\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical pathways standardize healthcare utilization, but their impact on healthcare equity is poorly understood. This study aims to measure the effect of a bronchiolitis pathway on management decisions by preferred language for care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included all emergency department encounters for patients aged 1-12 months with bronchiolitis from 1/1/2010 to 10/31/2020. The prepathway period ended 10/31/2011, and the postpathway period was 1/1/2012-10/31/2020. We performed retrospective interrupted time series analyses to assess the impact of the clinical pathway by English versus non-English preferred language on the following outcomes: chest radiography (CXR), albuterol use, 7-day return visit, 72-hour return to admission, antibiotic use, and corticosteroid use. Analyses were adjusted for presence of a complex chronic condition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 1485 encounters in the preperiod (77% English, 14% non-English, 8% missing) and 7840 encounters in the postperiod (79% English, 15% non-English, 6% missing). CXR, antibiotic, and albuterol utilization exhibited sustained decreases over the study period. Pathway impact did not differ by preferred language for any outcome except albuterol utilization. The prepost slope effect of albuterol utilization was 10% greater in the non-English versus the English group (p for the difference by language = 0.022).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A clinical pathway was associated with improvements in care regardless of preferred language. More extensive studies involving multiple pathways and care settings are needed to assess the impact of clinical pathways on health equity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric quality & safety\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10843310/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric quality & safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000714\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric quality & safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000714","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:临床路径规范了医疗保健的使用,但其对医疗保健公平性的影响却鲜为人知。本研究旨在衡量支气管炎路径对以首选语言进行护理的管理决策的影响:我们纳入了 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 10 月 31 日期间所有急诊科接诊的 1-12 个月大支气管炎患者。路径前时期截至 2011 年 10 月 31 日,路径后时期为 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 10 月 31 日。我们进行了回顾性间断时间序列分析,以评估临床路径中英语与非英语首选语言对以下结果的影响:胸片 (CXR)、阿布特罗使用、7 天回访、入院 72 小时回访、抗生素使用和皮质类固醇使用。分析结果根据是否存在复杂的慢性病进行了调整:前期有 1485 次就诊(77% 为英语,14% 为非英语,8% 为缺失),后期有 7840 次就诊(79% 为英语,15% 为非英语,6% 为缺失)。在研究期间,CXR、抗生素和沙丁胺醇的使用率持续下降。除阿布特罗使用率外,任何结果的路径影响均不因首选语言而异。与英语组相比,非英语组在使用阿布特罗方面的预后斜率效应要高出 10%(语言差异的 p = 0.022):结论:无论首选语言如何,临床路径都与护理的改善相关。要评估临床路径对健康公平的影响,需要进行更广泛的研究,涉及多种路径和护理环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of a Bronchiolitis Clinical Pathway on Management Decisions by Preferred Language.

Background: Clinical pathways standardize healthcare utilization, but their impact on healthcare equity is poorly understood. This study aims to measure the effect of a bronchiolitis pathway on management decisions by preferred language for care.

Methods: We included all emergency department encounters for patients aged 1-12 months with bronchiolitis from 1/1/2010 to 10/31/2020. The prepathway period ended 10/31/2011, and the postpathway period was 1/1/2012-10/31/2020. We performed retrospective interrupted time series analyses to assess the impact of the clinical pathway by English versus non-English preferred language on the following outcomes: chest radiography (CXR), albuterol use, 7-day return visit, 72-hour return to admission, antibiotic use, and corticosteroid use. Analyses were adjusted for presence of a complex chronic condition.

Results: There were 1485 encounters in the preperiod (77% English, 14% non-English, 8% missing) and 7840 encounters in the postperiod (79% English, 15% non-English, 6% missing). CXR, antibiotic, and albuterol utilization exhibited sustained decreases over the study period. Pathway impact did not differ by preferred language for any outcome except albuterol utilization. The prepost slope effect of albuterol utilization was 10% greater in the non-English versus the English group (p for the difference by language = 0.022).

Conclusions: A clinical pathway was associated with improvements in care regardless of preferred language. More extensive studies involving multiple pathways and care settings are needed to assess the impact of clinical pathways on health equity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信