在创伤外科人群中实施阿片类药物滥用风险筛查工具的可行性。

Implementation research and practice Pub Date : 2024-02-02 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26334895231226193
Amelia Baltes, David Horton, Colleen Trevino, Andrew Quanbeck, Brienna Deyo, Christopher Nicholas, Randall Brown
{"title":"在创伤外科人群中实施阿片类药物滥用风险筛查工具的可行性。","authors":"Amelia Baltes, David Horton, Colleen Trevino, Andrew Quanbeck, Brienna Deyo, Christopher Nicholas, Randall Brown","doi":"10.1177/26334895231226193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As the opioid crisis continues to affect communities across the United States, new interventions for screening and prevention are needed to mitigate its impact. Mental health diagnoses have been identified as a risk factor for opioid misuse, and surgical populations and injury survivors are at high risk for prolonged opioid use and misuse. This study investigated the implementation of a novel opioid risk screening tool that incorporated putative risk factors from a recent study in four trauma units across Wisconsin.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The screening tool was implemented across a 6-month period at four sites. Data was collected via monthly meeting notes and \"Plan, Do, Study, Act\" (PDSA) forms. Following implementation, focus groups reflected on the facilitators and barriers to implementation. Meeting notes, PDSA forms, and focus group data were analyzed using the consolidated framework for implementation research, followed by thematic analyses, to generate themes surrounding the facilitators and barriers to implementing an opioid misuse screener.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Implementation facilitators included ensuring patient understanding of the screener, minimizing staff burden from screening, and educating staff to encourage engagement. Barriers included infrastructure limitations that prevented seamless administration of the screener within current workflows, overlap of the screener with existing measures, and lack of guidance surrounding treatment options corresponding to risk. Recommended solutions to address barriers include careful timing of screener administration, accommodating workflows, integration of the screening tool within the electronic health record, and evidence-based interventions guided by screener results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Four trauma centers across Wisconsin successfully implemented a pilot opioid misuse screening tool. Trauma providers and unit staff members believe that this tool would be a beneficial addition to their repertoire if their recommendations were adopted. Future research should refine opioid misuse risk factors and ensure screening items are well-validated with psychometric research supporting treatment responses to screener-indicated risk categories.</p>","PeriodicalId":73354,"journal":{"name":"Implementation research and practice","volume":"5 ","pages":"26334895231226193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10838038/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of implementing a screening tool for risk of opioid misuse in a trauma surgical population.\",\"authors\":\"Amelia Baltes, David Horton, Colleen Trevino, Andrew Quanbeck, Brienna Deyo, Christopher Nicholas, Randall Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26334895231226193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As the opioid crisis continues to affect communities across the United States, new interventions for screening and prevention are needed to mitigate its impact. Mental health diagnoses have been identified as a risk factor for opioid misuse, and surgical populations and injury survivors are at high risk for prolonged opioid use and misuse. This study investigated the implementation of a novel opioid risk screening tool that incorporated putative risk factors from a recent study in four trauma units across Wisconsin.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The screening tool was implemented across a 6-month period at four sites. Data was collected via monthly meeting notes and \\\"Plan, Do, Study, Act\\\" (PDSA) forms. Following implementation, focus groups reflected on the facilitators and barriers to implementation. Meeting notes, PDSA forms, and focus group data were analyzed using the consolidated framework for implementation research, followed by thematic analyses, to generate themes surrounding the facilitators and barriers to implementing an opioid misuse screener.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Implementation facilitators included ensuring patient understanding of the screener, minimizing staff burden from screening, and educating staff to encourage engagement. Barriers included infrastructure limitations that prevented seamless administration of the screener within current workflows, overlap of the screener with existing measures, and lack of guidance surrounding treatment options corresponding to risk. Recommended solutions to address barriers include careful timing of screener administration, accommodating workflows, integration of the screening tool within the electronic health record, and evidence-based interventions guided by screener results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Four trauma centers across Wisconsin successfully implemented a pilot opioid misuse screening tool. Trauma providers and unit staff members believe that this tool would be a beneficial addition to their repertoire if their recommendations were adopted. Future research should refine opioid misuse risk factors and ensure screening items are well-validated with psychometric research supporting treatment responses to screener-indicated risk categories.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Implementation research and practice\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"26334895231226193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10838038/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Implementation research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26334895231226193\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26334895231226193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随着阿片类药物危机继续影响美国各地的社区,需要新的筛查和预防干预措施来减轻其影响。心理健康诊断已被确定为阿片类药物滥用的一个风险因素,手术人群和受伤幸存者长期使用和滥用阿片类药物的风险很高。本研究调查了新型阿片类药物风险筛查工具的实施情况,该工具纳入了威斯康星州四个创伤科室最近一项研究中提出的风险因素:该筛查工具在四个地点实施了 6 个月。通过每月会议记录和 "计划、实施、研究、行动"(PDSA)表格收集数据。实施后,焦点小组对实施的促进因素和障碍进行了反思。使用实施研究的综合框架对会议记录、PDSA 表格和焦点小组数据进行分析,然后进行主题分析,以产生围绕实施阿片类药物滥用筛查器的促进因素和障碍的主题:结果:实施的促进因素包括确保患者对筛查器的理解、尽量减轻筛查给员工带来的负担以及教育员工鼓励参与。障碍包括基础设施的限制导致无法在当前工作流程中无缝管理筛查器、筛查器与现有措施重叠以及缺乏与风险相对应的治疗方案指导。为解决这些障碍而推荐的解决方案包括:谨慎安排筛查器的使用时间、适应工作流程、将筛查工具整合到电子病历中,以及根据筛查器结果采取循证干预措施:威斯康星州的四个创伤中心成功实施了阿片类药物滥用筛查工具试点。创伤医疗人员和科室工作人员认为,如果他们的建议被采纳,该工具将成为他们的有益补充。未来的研究应完善阿片类药物滥用的风险因素,并确保筛查项目得到心理测量研究的充分验证,以支持对筛查器指示的风险类别做出治疗反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility of implementing a screening tool for risk of opioid misuse in a trauma surgical population.

Background: As the opioid crisis continues to affect communities across the United States, new interventions for screening and prevention are needed to mitigate its impact. Mental health diagnoses have been identified as a risk factor for opioid misuse, and surgical populations and injury survivors are at high risk for prolonged opioid use and misuse. This study investigated the implementation of a novel opioid risk screening tool that incorporated putative risk factors from a recent study in four trauma units across Wisconsin.

Method: The screening tool was implemented across a 6-month period at four sites. Data was collected via monthly meeting notes and "Plan, Do, Study, Act" (PDSA) forms. Following implementation, focus groups reflected on the facilitators and barriers to implementation. Meeting notes, PDSA forms, and focus group data were analyzed using the consolidated framework for implementation research, followed by thematic analyses, to generate themes surrounding the facilitators and barriers to implementing an opioid misuse screener.

Results: Implementation facilitators included ensuring patient understanding of the screener, minimizing staff burden from screening, and educating staff to encourage engagement. Barriers included infrastructure limitations that prevented seamless administration of the screener within current workflows, overlap of the screener with existing measures, and lack of guidance surrounding treatment options corresponding to risk. Recommended solutions to address barriers include careful timing of screener administration, accommodating workflows, integration of the screening tool within the electronic health record, and evidence-based interventions guided by screener results.

Conclusion: Four trauma centers across Wisconsin successfully implemented a pilot opioid misuse screening tool. Trauma providers and unit staff members believe that this tool would be a beneficial addition to their repertoire if their recommendations were adopted. Future research should refine opioid misuse risk factors and ensure screening items are well-validated with psychometric research supporting treatment responses to screener-indicated risk categories.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信