自杀未遂行为的基因特征:见解与应用。

IF 3.8 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Expert Review of Proteomics Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-08 DOI:10.1080/14789450.2024.2314143
Antonio Drago
{"title":"自杀未遂行为的基因特征:见解与应用。","authors":"Antonio Drago","doi":"10.1080/14789450.2024.2314143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Every year about 800,000 complete suicide events occur. The identification of biologic markers to identify subjects at risk would be helpful in targeting specific support treatments.</p><p><strong>Area covered: </strong>A narrative review defines the meta-analytic level of current evidence about the biologic markers of suicide behavior (SB). The meta-analytic evidence gathered so far indicates that the hypothesis-driven research largely failed to identify the biologic markers of suicide. The most consistent and replicated result was reported for: 1) 5-HTR2A T102C, associated with SB in patients with schizophrenia (OR = 1.73 (1.11-2.69)) and 2) BDNF Val66Met (rs6265), with the Met-Val + Val-Val carriers found to be at risk for suicide in the Caucasian population (OR: 1.96 (1.58-2.43)), while Val-Val vs. Val-Met + Met carriers found to be at risk for suicide in the Asian populations (OR: 1.36 (1.04-1.78)). GWAS-based meta-analyses indicate some positive replicated findings regarding the DRD2, Neuroligin gene, estrogen-related genes, and genes involved in gene expression.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Most consistent results were obtained when analyzing sub-samples of patients. Some promising results come from the implementation of the polygenic risk score. There is no current consensus about an implementable biomarker for SB.</p>","PeriodicalId":50463,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Proteomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genetic signatures of suicide attempt behavior: insights and applications.\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Drago\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14789450.2024.2314143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Every year about 800,000 complete suicide events occur. The identification of biologic markers to identify subjects at risk would be helpful in targeting specific support treatments.</p><p><strong>Area covered: </strong>A narrative review defines the meta-analytic level of current evidence about the biologic markers of suicide behavior (SB). The meta-analytic evidence gathered so far indicates that the hypothesis-driven research largely failed to identify the biologic markers of suicide. The most consistent and replicated result was reported for: 1) 5-HTR2A T102C, associated with SB in patients with schizophrenia (OR = 1.73 (1.11-2.69)) and 2) BDNF Val66Met (rs6265), with the Met-Val + Val-Val carriers found to be at risk for suicide in the Caucasian population (OR: 1.96 (1.58-2.43)), while Val-Val vs. Val-Met + Met carriers found to be at risk for suicide in the Asian populations (OR: 1.36 (1.04-1.78)). GWAS-based meta-analyses indicate some positive replicated findings regarding the DRD2, Neuroligin gene, estrogen-related genes, and genes involved in gene expression.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Most consistent results were obtained when analyzing sub-samples of patients. Some promising results come from the implementation of the polygenic risk score. There is no current consensus about an implementable biomarker for SB.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Proteomics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Proteomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14789450.2024.2314143\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Proteomics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14789450.2024.2314143","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介每年大约发生 80 万起完全自杀事件。确定识别高危人群的生物标志物将有助于有针对性地采取具体的支持治疗措施:叙述性综述界定了目前有关自杀行为(SB)生物标志物的元分析证据水平。迄今为止收集到的元分析证据表明,假设驱动型研究在很大程度上未能确定自杀的生物学标志物。报告的最一致和重复的结果是1)5-HTR2A T102C,与精神分裂症患者的自杀行为相关(OR = 1.73 (1.11-2.69));2)BDNF Val66Met (rs6265),发现在白种人群中,Met-Val + Val-Val 携带者有自杀风险(OR:1.96(1.58 - 2.43)),而在亚洲人群中,Val-Val 与 Val-Met + Met 携带者有自杀风险(OR:1.36(1.04 - 1.78))。基于 GWAS 的荟萃分析表明,在 DRD2、Neuroligin 基因、雌激素相关基因和涉及基因表达的基因方面有一些积极的重复研究结果:专家意见:对患者子样本的分析结果最为一致。多基因风险评分的实施带来了一些有希望的结果。目前尚未就可实施的 SB 生物标志物达成共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Genetic signatures of suicide attempt behavior: insights and applications.

Introduction: Every year about 800,000 complete suicide events occur. The identification of biologic markers to identify subjects at risk would be helpful in targeting specific support treatments.

Area covered: A narrative review defines the meta-analytic level of current evidence about the biologic markers of suicide behavior (SB). The meta-analytic evidence gathered so far indicates that the hypothesis-driven research largely failed to identify the biologic markers of suicide. The most consistent and replicated result was reported for: 1) 5-HTR2A T102C, associated with SB in patients with schizophrenia (OR = 1.73 (1.11-2.69)) and 2) BDNF Val66Met (rs6265), with the Met-Val + Val-Val carriers found to be at risk for suicide in the Caucasian population (OR: 1.96 (1.58-2.43)), while Val-Val vs. Val-Met + Met carriers found to be at risk for suicide in the Asian populations (OR: 1.36 (1.04-1.78)). GWAS-based meta-analyses indicate some positive replicated findings regarding the DRD2, Neuroligin gene, estrogen-related genes, and genes involved in gene expression.

Expert opinion: Most consistent results were obtained when analyzing sub-samples of patients. Some promising results come from the implementation of the polygenic risk score. There is no current consensus about an implementable biomarker for SB.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Proteomics
Expert Review of Proteomics 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Proteomics (ISSN 1478-9450) seeks to collect together technologies, methods and discoveries from the field of proteomics to advance scientific understanding of the many varied roles protein expression plays in human health and disease. The journal coverage includes, but is not limited to, overviews of specific technological advances in the development of protein arrays, interaction maps, data archives and biological assays, performance of new technologies and prospects for future drug discovery. The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections: Expert Opinion - a personal view on the most effective or promising strategies and a clear perspective of future prospects within a realistic timescale Article highlights - an executive summary cutting to the author''s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信