从多专业角度减少道德困扰:定性调查。

IF 2.9 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Nursing Ethics Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-05 DOI:10.1177/09697330241230519
Sophia Fantus, Rebecca Cole, Timothy J Usset, Lataya E Hawkins
{"title":"从多专业角度减少道德困扰:定性调查。","authors":"Sophia Fantus, Rebecca Cole, Timothy J Usset, Lataya E Hawkins","doi":"10.1177/09697330241230519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Encounters of moral distress have long-term consequences on healthcare workers' physical and mental health, leading to job dissatisfaction, reduced patient care, and high levels of burnout, exhaustion, and intentions to quit. Yet, research on approaches to ameliorate moral distress across the health workforce is limited.</p><p><strong>Research objective: </strong>The aim of our study was to qualitatively explore multi-professional perspectives of healthcare social workers, chaplains, and patient liaisons on ways to reduce moral distress and heighten well-being at a southern U.S. academic medical center.</p><p><strong>Participants & research context: </strong>Purposive sampling and chain-referral methods assisted with recruitment through hospital listservs, staff meetings, and newsletters. Interested participants contacted the principal investigator and all interviews were conducted in-person. Consent was attained prior to interviews. All interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>Directed content analysis was used to deductively organize codes and to develop themes in conjunction with the National Academy of Medicine's National Plan for Health Workforce Well-Being. Rigor was attained through peer-debriefing, data triangulation methods, and frequent research team meetings.</p><p><strong>Ethical considerations: </strong>Ethics approval was obtained from the university and medical center institutional review boards.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Themes demonstrate that rather than offering interventions in the aftermath of moral distress, multilevel daily practices ought to be considered that pre-emptively identify and reduce morally distressing encounters through (1) the care team, (2) management and leadership, and (3) the health care industry. Strategies include interdisciplinary decision-making, trusting managerial relationships, and organizational policies and practices that explicitly invest in mental health promotion and diverse leadership opportunities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Moral distress interventions ought to target short-term stress reactions while also addressing the long-term impacts of moral residue. Health systems must financially commit to an ethical workplace culture that explicitly values mental health and well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":49729,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"1513-1523"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577696/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-professional perspectives to reduce moral distress: A qualitative investigation.\",\"authors\":\"Sophia Fantus, Rebecca Cole, Timothy J Usset, Lataya E Hawkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09697330241230519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Encounters of moral distress have long-term consequences on healthcare workers' physical and mental health, leading to job dissatisfaction, reduced patient care, and high levels of burnout, exhaustion, and intentions to quit. Yet, research on approaches to ameliorate moral distress across the health workforce is limited.</p><p><strong>Research objective: </strong>The aim of our study was to qualitatively explore multi-professional perspectives of healthcare social workers, chaplains, and patient liaisons on ways to reduce moral distress and heighten well-being at a southern U.S. academic medical center.</p><p><strong>Participants & research context: </strong>Purposive sampling and chain-referral methods assisted with recruitment through hospital listservs, staff meetings, and newsletters. Interested participants contacted the principal investigator and all interviews were conducted in-person. Consent was attained prior to interviews. All interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>Directed content analysis was used to deductively organize codes and to develop themes in conjunction with the National Academy of Medicine's National Plan for Health Workforce Well-Being. Rigor was attained through peer-debriefing, data triangulation methods, and frequent research team meetings.</p><p><strong>Ethical considerations: </strong>Ethics approval was obtained from the university and medical center institutional review boards.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Themes demonstrate that rather than offering interventions in the aftermath of moral distress, multilevel daily practices ought to be considered that pre-emptively identify and reduce morally distressing encounters through (1) the care team, (2) management and leadership, and (3) the health care industry. Strategies include interdisciplinary decision-making, trusting managerial relationships, and organizational policies and practices that explicitly invest in mental health promotion and diverse leadership opportunities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Moral distress interventions ought to target short-term stress reactions while also addressing the long-term impacts of moral residue. Health systems must financially commit to an ethical workplace culture that explicitly values mental health and well-being.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Ethics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1513-1523\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577696/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330241230519\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330241230519","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:遭遇道德困扰会对医护人员的身心健康造成长期影响,导致他们对工作不满、减少对患者的护理、产生严重的职业倦怠、疲惫和辞职意向。然而,关于如何改善医务工作者道德困扰的研究却十分有限:研究目的:我们的研究旨在定性地探讨美国南部一家学术医疗中心的医护社工、牧师和患者联络员等多专业人员对如何减轻道德压力和提高幸福感的看法:通过医院列表服务器、员工会议和新闻简报,以有目的的抽样和连锁转介方法协助招募。有兴趣的参与者与主要研究人员联系,所有访谈都是当面进行的。访谈前均已征得同意。所有访谈都进行了录音和逐字记录:研究设计:根据美国国家医学科学院的 "健康劳动力福利国家计划",采用指导性内容分析法对代码进行演绎整理并形成主题。通过同行汇报、数据三角测量方法和频繁的研究小组会议来实现严谨性:研究结果:研究主题表明,与其在道德困扰发生后才采取干预措施,不如考虑采取多层次的日常措施,通过(1)护理团队、(2)管理层和领导层以及(3)医疗保健行业,先发制人地识别和减少道德困扰。策略包括跨学科决策、相互信任的管理关系,以及明确投资于促进心理健康和多样化领导机会的组织政策和实践:道德困扰干预措施应针对短期压力反应,同时还要解决道德残余的长期影响。医疗系统必须在财政上致力于营造一种道德的工作场所文化,明确重视心理健康和幸福。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multi-professional perspectives to reduce moral distress: A qualitative investigation.

Background: Encounters of moral distress have long-term consequences on healthcare workers' physical and mental health, leading to job dissatisfaction, reduced patient care, and high levels of burnout, exhaustion, and intentions to quit. Yet, research on approaches to ameliorate moral distress across the health workforce is limited.

Research objective: The aim of our study was to qualitatively explore multi-professional perspectives of healthcare social workers, chaplains, and patient liaisons on ways to reduce moral distress and heighten well-being at a southern U.S. academic medical center.

Participants & research context: Purposive sampling and chain-referral methods assisted with recruitment through hospital listservs, staff meetings, and newsletters. Interested participants contacted the principal investigator and all interviews were conducted in-person. Consent was attained prior to interviews. All interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim.

Research design: Directed content analysis was used to deductively organize codes and to develop themes in conjunction with the National Academy of Medicine's National Plan for Health Workforce Well-Being. Rigor was attained through peer-debriefing, data triangulation methods, and frequent research team meetings.

Ethical considerations: Ethics approval was obtained from the university and medical center institutional review boards.

Findings: Themes demonstrate that rather than offering interventions in the aftermath of moral distress, multilevel daily practices ought to be considered that pre-emptively identify and reduce morally distressing encounters through (1) the care team, (2) management and leadership, and (3) the health care industry. Strategies include interdisciplinary decision-making, trusting managerial relationships, and organizational policies and practices that explicitly invest in mental health promotion and diverse leadership opportunities.

Conclusion: Moral distress interventions ought to target short-term stress reactions while also addressing the long-term impacts of moral residue. Health systems must financially commit to an ethical workplace culture that explicitly values mental health and well-being.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Ethics
Nursing Ethics 医学-护理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.90%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Ethics takes a practical approach to this complex subject and relates each topic to the working environment. The articles on ethical and legal issues are written in a comprehensible style and official documents are analysed in a user-friendly way. The international Editorial Board ensures the selection of a wide range of high quality articles of global significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信