Dexcom G7 血糖监测系统在糖尿病孕妇中的表现。

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Diabetes technology & therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1089/dia.2023.0516
Sarit Polsky, Amy M Valent, Elvira Isganaitis, Kristin Castorino, Grenye O'Malley, Stayce E Beck, Peggy Gao, Lori M Laffel, Florence M Brown, Carol J Levy
{"title":"Dexcom G7 血糖监测系统在糖尿病孕妇中的表现。","authors":"Sarit Polsky, Amy M Valent, Elvira Isganaitis, Kristin Castorino, Grenye O'Malley, Stayce E Beck, Peggy Gao, Lori M Laffel, Florence M Brown, Carol J Levy","doi":"10.1089/dia.2023.0516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> We evaluated accuracy and safety of a seventh-generation real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system during pregnancy. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> Evaluable data for accuracy analysis were obtained from 96 G7 sensors (Dexcom, Inc.) worn by 96 of 105 enrolled pregnant women with type 1 (<i>n</i> = 59), type 2 (<i>n</i> = 21), or gestational diabetes (<i>n</i> = 25). CGM values were compared with arterialized venous glucose values from the YSI comparator instrument during 6-h clinic sessions at different time points throughout the sensors' 10-day wear period. The primary endpoint was the proportion of CGM values in the 70-180 mg/dL range within 15% of comparator glucose values. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of CGM values within 20% or 20 mg/dL of comparator values ≥ or <100 mg/dL, respectively (the %20/20 agreement rate). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of the 1739 pairs with CGM in the 70-180 mg/dL range, 83.2% were within 15% of comparator values. The lower bound of the 95% confidence interval was 79.8%. Of the 2102 pairs with CGM values in the 40-400 mg/dL range, the %20/20 agreement rate was 92.5%. Of the 1659 pairs with comparator values in the 63-140 mg/dL range, the %20/20 agreement rate was 92.3%. The %20/20 agreement rates on days 1, 4 and 7, and 10 were 78.6%, 96.3%, and 97.3%, respectively. Consensus error grid analysis showed 99.8% of pairs in the clinically acceptable A and B zones. There were no serious adverse events. The sensors' 10-day survival rate was 90.3%. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The G7 system is accurate and safe during pregnancies complicated by diabetes and does not require confirmatory fingerstick testing. <b><i>Clinical Trial Registration:</i></b> clinicaltrials.gov NCT04905628.</p>","PeriodicalId":11159,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"307-312"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11058415/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of the Dexcom G7 Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Pregnant Women with Diabetes.\",\"authors\":\"Sarit Polsky, Amy M Valent, Elvira Isganaitis, Kristin Castorino, Grenye O'Malley, Stayce E Beck, Peggy Gao, Lori M Laffel, Florence M Brown, Carol J Levy\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/dia.2023.0516\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> We evaluated accuracy and safety of a seventh-generation real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system during pregnancy. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> Evaluable data for accuracy analysis were obtained from 96 G7 sensors (Dexcom, Inc.) worn by 96 of 105 enrolled pregnant women with type 1 (<i>n</i> = 59), type 2 (<i>n</i> = 21), or gestational diabetes (<i>n</i> = 25). CGM values were compared with arterialized venous glucose values from the YSI comparator instrument during 6-h clinic sessions at different time points throughout the sensors' 10-day wear period. The primary endpoint was the proportion of CGM values in the 70-180 mg/dL range within 15% of comparator glucose values. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of CGM values within 20% or 20 mg/dL of comparator values ≥ or <100 mg/dL, respectively (the %20/20 agreement rate). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of the 1739 pairs with CGM in the 70-180 mg/dL range, 83.2% were within 15% of comparator values. The lower bound of the 95% confidence interval was 79.8%. Of the 2102 pairs with CGM values in the 40-400 mg/dL range, the %20/20 agreement rate was 92.5%. Of the 1659 pairs with comparator values in the 63-140 mg/dL range, the %20/20 agreement rate was 92.3%. The %20/20 agreement rates on days 1, 4 and 7, and 10 were 78.6%, 96.3%, and 97.3%, respectively. Consensus error grid analysis showed 99.8% of pairs in the clinically acceptable A and B zones. There were no serious adverse events. The sensors' 10-day survival rate was 90.3%. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The G7 system is accurate and safe during pregnancies complicated by diabetes and does not require confirmatory fingerstick testing. <b><i>Clinical Trial Registration:</i></b> clinicaltrials.gov NCT04905628.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes technology & therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"307-312\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11058415/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes technology & therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2023.0516\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2023.0516","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们评估了第七代实时连续血糖监测(CGM)系统在妊娠期的准确性和安全性。在 105 名 1 型糖尿病(59 人)、2 型糖尿病(21 人)或妊娠糖尿病(25 人)孕妇中,有 96 名孕妇佩戴了 96 个 G7 传感器(Dexcom 公司),从中获得了用于准确性分析的可评估数据。在传感器的 10 天佩戴期内,将 CGM 值与 YSI 比较仪器在 6 小时门诊期间不同时间点的动脉静脉血糖值进行比较。主要终点是 CGM 值在 70-180 毫克/分升范围内的比例不超过比较者血糖值的 15%。次要终点包括 CGM 值在 20% 或 20 mg/dL 范围内的对比值≥ 或
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance of the Dexcom G7 Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Pregnant Women with Diabetes.

Background: We evaluated accuracy and safety of a seventh-generation real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system during pregnancy. Materials and Methods: Evaluable data for accuracy analysis were obtained from 96 G7 sensors (Dexcom, Inc.) worn by 96 of 105 enrolled pregnant women with type 1 (n = 59), type 2 (n = 21), or gestational diabetes (n = 25). CGM values were compared with arterialized venous glucose values from the YSI comparator instrument during 6-h clinic sessions at different time points throughout the sensors' 10-day wear period. The primary endpoint was the proportion of CGM values in the 70-180 mg/dL range within 15% of comparator glucose values. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of CGM values within 20% or 20 mg/dL of comparator values ≥ or <100 mg/dL, respectively (the %20/20 agreement rate). Results: Of the 1739 pairs with CGM in the 70-180 mg/dL range, 83.2% were within 15% of comparator values. The lower bound of the 95% confidence interval was 79.8%. Of the 2102 pairs with CGM values in the 40-400 mg/dL range, the %20/20 agreement rate was 92.5%. Of the 1659 pairs with comparator values in the 63-140 mg/dL range, the %20/20 agreement rate was 92.3%. The %20/20 agreement rates on days 1, 4 and 7, and 10 were 78.6%, 96.3%, and 97.3%, respectively. Consensus error grid analysis showed 99.8% of pairs in the clinically acceptable A and B zones. There were no serious adverse events. The sensors' 10-day survival rate was 90.3%. Conclusion: The G7 system is accurate and safe during pregnancies complicated by diabetes and does not require confirmatory fingerstick testing. Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov NCT04905628.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes technology & therapeutics
Diabetes technology & therapeutics 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
14.80%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal providing healthcare professionals with information on new devices, drugs, drug delivery systems, and software for managing patients with diabetes. This leading international journal delivers practical information and comprehensive coverage of cutting-edge technologies and therapeutics in the field, and each issue highlights new pharmacological and device developments to optimize patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信