为泰国肝硬化门诊患者开发易于使用的营养咨询工具及其有效性和可靠性

Q4 Medicine
N. Sukittiwarapun, C. Churuangsuk, T. Inviya, P. Sripongpun, N. Chamroonkul
{"title":"为泰国肝硬化门诊患者开发易于使用的营养咨询工具及其有效性和可靠性","authors":"N. Sukittiwarapun, C. Churuangsuk, T. Inviya, P. Sripongpun, N. Chamroonkul","doi":"10.31584/jhsmr.20241032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: We developed a simple nutritional counseling tool for adults with liver cirrhosis, aiming for doctors, nurses, and patients as the tool’s primary users.Material and Methods: The tool was created in a booklet design and based on the European Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition guideline, which comprises four parts, knowledge about cirrhosis, consequences of malnutrition, nutritional recommendations, and calculation of dry body weight and appropriate daily nutritional requirements. Content validity was assessed by three hepatologists using the item objective congruence (IOC) index wherein a score ≥0.5 indicated valid content. Face validity was evaluated by three doctors, three nurses, one dietitian, and three patients for readability, coherence, understandability, and attractiveness using a rating score of 0-10. A reliability test to calculate dry body weight and carbohydrate and protein intake per meal using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was conducted to determine the agreement among seven doctors and three nurses (inter-raters) using a total of nine case scenarios.Results: The contents of the booklet were valid (IOC: 1.00 for all 19 items). For face validity, the scores for readability, coherence, attractiveness, and understandability were 7.6, 8.6, 9, and 8.6 out of 10, respectively. The overall comments showed that the new instrument was attractive and convenient. All doctors and nurses correctly calculated the dry body weight, and carbohydrate and protein intake for nine case scenarios, indicating excellent agreement (ICC: 1.0, p-value<0.001).Conclusion: The novel nutritional counseling booklet is valid and shows excellent reliability among healthcare providers in calculating body status and nutritional requirements.","PeriodicalId":36211,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research","volume":"47 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development, Validity, and Reliability of an Easy-to-Use Nutrition Counseling Tool for Thai Outpatients with Liver Cirrhosis\",\"authors\":\"N. Sukittiwarapun, C. Churuangsuk, T. Inviya, P. Sripongpun, N. Chamroonkul\",\"doi\":\"10.31584/jhsmr.20241032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: We developed a simple nutritional counseling tool for adults with liver cirrhosis, aiming for doctors, nurses, and patients as the tool’s primary users.Material and Methods: The tool was created in a booklet design and based on the European Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition guideline, which comprises four parts, knowledge about cirrhosis, consequences of malnutrition, nutritional recommendations, and calculation of dry body weight and appropriate daily nutritional requirements. Content validity was assessed by three hepatologists using the item objective congruence (IOC) index wherein a score ≥0.5 indicated valid content. Face validity was evaluated by three doctors, three nurses, one dietitian, and three patients for readability, coherence, understandability, and attractiveness using a rating score of 0-10. A reliability test to calculate dry body weight and carbohydrate and protein intake per meal using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was conducted to determine the agreement among seven doctors and three nurses (inter-raters) using a total of nine case scenarios.Results: The contents of the booklet were valid (IOC: 1.00 for all 19 items). For face validity, the scores for readability, coherence, attractiveness, and understandability were 7.6, 8.6, 9, and 8.6 out of 10, respectively. The overall comments showed that the new instrument was attractive and convenient. All doctors and nurses correctly calculated the dry body weight, and carbohydrate and protein intake for nine case scenarios, indicating excellent agreement (ICC: 1.0, p-value<0.001).Conclusion: The novel nutritional counseling booklet is valid and shows excellent reliability among healthcare providers in calculating body status and nutritional requirements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"47 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.20241032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.20241032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们为成人肝硬化患者开发了一个简单的营养咨询工具:我们为成人肝硬化患者开发了一个简单的营养咨询工具,以医生、护士和患者为工具的主要使用者:该工具采用小册子设计,以欧洲肠外肠内营养学会指南为基础,包括四个部分:肝硬化知识、营养不良的后果、营养建议、干体重计算和适当的每日营养需求。内容有效性由三位肝病专家使用项目客观一致性(IOC)指数进行评估,得分≥0.5 表示内容有效。表面效度由三位医生、三位护士、一位营养师和三位患者使用 0-10 分的评分标准对可读性、连贯性、可理解性和吸引力进行评估。使用类内相关系数(ICC)对计算干体重以及每餐碳水化合物和蛋白质摄入量进行了可靠性测试,以确定七位医生和三位护士(评分者之间)在九种情况下的一致性:结果:手册内容有效(所有 19 个项目的 IOC 均为 1.00)。在面效方面,可读性、连贯性、吸引力和可理解性的得分分别为 7.6、8.6、9 和 8.6(满分 10 分)。总体评价显示,新工具既美观又方便。所有医生和护士都能正确计算出 9 个病例的干体重、碳水化合物和蛋白质摄入量,显示出极好的一致性(ICC:1.0,P 值<0.001):结论:新型营养咨询手册是有效的,在医护人员计算身体状况和营养需求方面显示出极佳的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development, Validity, and Reliability of an Easy-to-Use Nutrition Counseling Tool for Thai Outpatients with Liver Cirrhosis
Objective: We developed a simple nutritional counseling tool for adults with liver cirrhosis, aiming for doctors, nurses, and patients as the tool’s primary users.Material and Methods: The tool was created in a booklet design and based on the European Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition guideline, which comprises four parts, knowledge about cirrhosis, consequences of malnutrition, nutritional recommendations, and calculation of dry body weight and appropriate daily nutritional requirements. Content validity was assessed by three hepatologists using the item objective congruence (IOC) index wherein a score ≥0.5 indicated valid content. Face validity was evaluated by three doctors, three nurses, one dietitian, and three patients for readability, coherence, understandability, and attractiveness using a rating score of 0-10. A reliability test to calculate dry body weight and carbohydrate and protein intake per meal using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was conducted to determine the agreement among seven doctors and three nurses (inter-raters) using a total of nine case scenarios.Results: The contents of the booklet were valid (IOC: 1.00 for all 19 items). For face validity, the scores for readability, coherence, attractiveness, and understandability were 7.6, 8.6, 9, and 8.6 out of 10, respectively. The overall comments showed that the new instrument was attractive and convenient. All doctors and nurses correctly calculated the dry body weight, and carbohydrate and protein intake for nine case scenarios, indicating excellent agreement (ICC: 1.0, p-value<0.001).Conclusion: The novel nutritional counseling booklet is valid and shows excellent reliability among healthcare providers in calculating body status and nutritional requirements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信