{"title":"关于 Simplicity & Vogue Retailing (HK) Co Ltd [2023] HKCFI 1443 (HCCW 457/2022, 30 May 2023) (coram Linda Chan J) [案件评论]","authors":"Kenneth Zealot Tsui","doi":"10.1002/iir.1530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The impact of an exclusive jurisdiction clause on a winding-up petition is settled in the English and Singaporean common law jurisdictions. In Hong Kong, the matter has recently been decided in the case of <i>Re Guy Kwok Hung Lam</i> (2023) 26 HKCFAR 119. Nonetheless, a similar issue has been brought up again in the cases of <i>Re Simplicity & Vogue Retailing (HK) Co Ltd</i> [2023] HKCFI 1443 (HCCW 457/2022, 30 May 2023) (per Linda Chan J) and Re <i>Shandong Chenming Paper Holdings Ltd</i> [2023] HKCFI 2731 (HCCW 175/2017, 25 October 2023) (per Harris J). The different approaches adopted in the two cases have sparked on the correct appraoch to be adopted. This article briefly introduces the different appraoches and suggest that the correct approach is to stay a winding-up petition in favour of an arbitration proceeedings launched purusant to an arbitration agreement.</p>","PeriodicalId":53971,"journal":{"name":"International Insolvency Review","volume":"33 2","pages":"146-156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/iir.1530","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re Simplicity & Vogue Retailing (HK) Co Ltd [2023] HKCFI 1443 (HCCW 457/2022, 30 May 2023) (coram Linda Chan J) [case comment]\",\"authors\":\"Kenneth Zealot Tsui\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/iir.1530\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The impact of an exclusive jurisdiction clause on a winding-up petition is settled in the English and Singaporean common law jurisdictions. In Hong Kong, the matter has recently been decided in the case of <i>Re Guy Kwok Hung Lam</i> (2023) 26 HKCFAR 119. Nonetheless, a similar issue has been brought up again in the cases of <i>Re Simplicity & Vogue Retailing (HK) Co Ltd</i> [2023] HKCFI 1443 (HCCW 457/2022, 30 May 2023) (per Linda Chan J) and Re <i>Shandong Chenming Paper Holdings Ltd</i> [2023] HKCFI 2731 (HCCW 175/2017, 25 October 2023) (per Harris J). The different approaches adopted in the two cases have sparked on the correct appraoch to be adopted. This article briefly introduces the different appraoches and suggest that the correct approach is to stay a winding-up petition in favour of an arbitration proceeedings launched purusant to an arbitration agreement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53971,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Insolvency Review\",\"volume\":\"33 2\",\"pages\":\"146-156\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/iir.1530\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Insolvency Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/iir.1530\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Insolvency Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/iir.1530","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
专属管辖权条款对清盘申请的影响在英国和新加坡的普通法司法管辖区已有定论。在香港，最近在 Re Guy Kwok Hung Lam (2023) 26 HKCFAR 119 一案中对此事作出了裁决。然而，在 Re Simplicity & Vogue Retailing (HK) Co Ltd [2023] HKCFI 1443（HCCW 457/2022，2023 年 5 月 30 日）（法官 Linda Chan）和 Re Shandong Chenming Paper Holdings Ltd [2023] HKCFI 2731（HCCW 175/2017，2023 年 10 月 25 日）（法官 Harris）两案中，类似问题再次被提出。这两起案件中采用的不同方法引发了对正确评估方法的讨论。本文简要介绍了不同的评估方法，并建议正确的方法是中止清盘申请，以支持根据仲裁协议启动的仲裁程序。
Re Simplicity & Vogue Retailing (HK) Co Ltd [2023] HKCFI 1443 (HCCW 457/2022, 30 May 2023) (coram Linda Chan J) [case comment]
The impact of an exclusive jurisdiction clause on a winding-up petition is settled in the English and Singaporean common law jurisdictions. In Hong Kong, the matter has recently been decided in the case of Re Guy Kwok Hung Lam (2023) 26 HKCFAR 119. Nonetheless, a similar issue has been brought up again in the cases of Re Simplicity & Vogue Retailing (HK) Co Ltd [2023] HKCFI 1443 (HCCW 457/2022, 30 May 2023) (per Linda Chan J) and Re Shandong Chenming Paper Holdings Ltd [2023] HKCFI 2731 (HCCW 175/2017, 25 October 2023) (per Harris J). The different approaches adopted in the two cases have sparked on the correct appraoch to be adopted. This article briefly introduces the different appraoches and suggest that the correct approach is to stay a winding-up petition in favour of an arbitration proceeedings launched purusant to an arbitration agreement.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
