Tamara Kamp, Sandra Brouwer, Gesine H Seeber, Søren Overgaard, Maaike G J Gademan, Martin Stevens
{"title":"丹麦、德国和荷兰的全髋关节或膝关节置换术后重返工作岗位政策和实践:一项探索性研究。","authors":"Tamara Kamp, Sandra Brouwer, Gesine H Seeber, Søren Overgaard, Maaike G J Gademan, Martin Stevens","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2024.2304084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore return-to-work (RTW) policies and practices for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients in three European countries.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An exploratory study in Denmark, Germany, and the Netherlands consisting of three aspects: (1) description of the healthcare and social security systems; (2) identification of national RTW guidelines; (3) a survey to gain insight into RTW practices and perceptions of orthopaedic surgeons, including barriers, facilitators, and needs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Healthcare and social security systems differed (e.g. fast-track vs longer postoperative stay; coverage of rehabilitation costs). National guidelines were available in Germany (THA, TKA) and the Netherlands (TKA), containing limited RTW information. The survey was completed by 168 orthopaedic surgeons (Denmark <i>n</i> = 51; Germany <i>n</i> = 39; the Netherlands <i>n</i> = 78). Overall, orthopaedic surgeons reported being in need of more knowledge and better collaboration with other healthcare practitioners.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found considerable variation in healthcare and social security systems. When available, national guidelines contained limited information. In all three countries surgeons need more knowledge and better collaboration with other healthcare practitioners. We advise that RTW multidisciplinary recommendations post THA/TKA be established by the national associations of the healthcare practitioners involved.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"5313-5322"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Return to work policies and practices after total hip or knee arthroplasty in Denmark, Germany, and the Netherlands: an exploratory study.\",\"authors\":\"Tamara Kamp, Sandra Brouwer, Gesine H Seeber, Søren Overgaard, Maaike G J Gademan, Martin Stevens\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09638288.2024.2304084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore return-to-work (RTW) policies and practices for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients in three European countries.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An exploratory study in Denmark, Germany, and the Netherlands consisting of three aspects: (1) description of the healthcare and social security systems; (2) identification of national RTW guidelines; (3) a survey to gain insight into RTW practices and perceptions of orthopaedic surgeons, including barriers, facilitators, and needs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Healthcare and social security systems differed (e.g. fast-track vs longer postoperative stay; coverage of rehabilitation costs). National guidelines were available in Germany (THA, TKA) and the Netherlands (TKA), containing limited RTW information. The survey was completed by 168 orthopaedic surgeons (Denmark <i>n</i> = 51; Germany <i>n</i> = 39; the Netherlands <i>n</i> = 78). Overall, orthopaedic surgeons reported being in need of more knowledge and better collaboration with other healthcare practitioners.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found considerable variation in healthcare and social security systems. When available, national guidelines contained limited information. In all three countries surgeons need more knowledge and better collaboration with other healthcare practitioners. We advise that RTW multidisciplinary recommendations post THA/TKA be established by the national associations of the healthcare practitioners involved.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"5313-5322\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2304084\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2304084","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:探讨三个欧洲国家针对全髋关节置换术(THA)和全膝关节置换术(TKA)患者的重返工作岗位(RTW)政策和实践:在丹麦、德国和荷兰进行的探索性研究包括三个方面:(1) 医疗保健和社会保障体系的描述;(2) 国家 RTW 指导方针的确定;(3) 一项旨在深入了解 RTW 实践和矫形外科医生看法(包括障碍、促进因素和需求)的调查:结果:医疗保健和社会保障体系各不相同(如快速通道与更长的术后住院时间;康复费用的覆盖范围)。德国(THA、TKA)和荷兰(TKA)制定了国家指导方针,其中包含有限的 RTW 信息。168 名矫形外科医生完成了调查(丹麦 n = 51;德国 n = 39;荷兰 n = 78)。总体而言,矫形外科医生表示需要更多的知识以及与其他医疗从业人员更好的合作:结论:我们发现医疗保健和社会保障体系存在很大差异。如果有的话,国家指导方针中包含的信息也很有限。这三个国家的外科医生都需要更多的知识,并与其他医疗从业人员加强合作。我们建议,THA/TKA术后的复工多学科建议应由相关医疗从业人员的国家协会制定。
Return to work policies and practices after total hip or knee arthroplasty in Denmark, Germany, and the Netherlands: an exploratory study.
Purpose: To explore return-to-work (RTW) policies and practices for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients in three European countries.
Materials and methods: An exploratory study in Denmark, Germany, and the Netherlands consisting of three aspects: (1) description of the healthcare and social security systems; (2) identification of national RTW guidelines; (3) a survey to gain insight into RTW practices and perceptions of orthopaedic surgeons, including barriers, facilitators, and needs.
Results: Healthcare and social security systems differed (e.g. fast-track vs longer postoperative stay; coverage of rehabilitation costs). National guidelines were available in Germany (THA, TKA) and the Netherlands (TKA), containing limited RTW information. The survey was completed by 168 orthopaedic surgeons (Denmark n = 51; Germany n = 39; the Netherlands n = 78). Overall, orthopaedic surgeons reported being in need of more knowledge and better collaboration with other healthcare practitioners.
Conclusion: We found considerable variation in healthcare and social security systems. When available, national guidelines contained limited information. In all three countries surgeons need more knowledge and better collaboration with other healthcare practitioners. We advise that RTW multidisciplinary recommendations post THA/TKA be established by the national associations of the healthcare practitioners involved.
期刊介绍:
Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.