Alessandro Giollo, Mariangela Salvato, Francesca Frizzera, Margherita Zen, Andrea Doria
{"title":"类风湿性关节炎的超低剂量糖皮质激素治疗:开始使用 b/tsDMARDs 的时机对糖皮质激素停药的影响。","authors":"Alessandro Giollo, Mariangela Salvato, Francesca Frizzera, Margherita Zen, Andrea Doria","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/keae077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We investigated the effectiveness and safety of very-low-dose (<5 mg/day) glucocorticoids (GCs) in patients with RA treated with biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective cohort study, we included all RA patients who started their first b/tsDMARDs at our institution between 2015 and 2020 and were monitored every 6 months for 3 years. Relationships between exposure to very-low-dose GCs and disease activity were examined through multivariable logistic regression and repeated-measures analysis of variance. The impact of very-low-dose GCs on safety was also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 229 RA patients, of whom 68% were prescribed very-low-dose GCs and 32% received no GCs. After 3 years on b/tsDMARDs, 32% had never abandoned, 20% had gone on and off and 23% had permanently discontinued very-low-dose GCs, while 25% had never taken GCs. Shorter disease duration at b/tsDMARD initiation was the single modifiable predictor of very-low-dose GC cessation [odds ratio 1.1 (95% CI 1.03, 1.14) for any 1-year decrease; P = 0.001]. A significant association existed between ongoing utilization of very-low-dose GCs and persistent moderate disease activity. Use of very-low-dose GCs was associated with hypertension (20% vs 11%) and myocardial infarction (2.3% vs 0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A substantial proportion of RA patients treated with b/tsDMARDs continue to receive very-low-dose GCs without significantly improving disease control. However, this appears to increase cardiovascular morbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":21255,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"501-508"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Very-low-dose glucocorticoid therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: impact of b/tsDMARDs initiation timing on glucocorticoid withdrawal.\",\"authors\":\"Alessandro Giollo, Mariangela Salvato, Francesca Frizzera, Margherita Zen, Andrea Doria\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/rheumatology/keae077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We investigated the effectiveness and safety of very-low-dose (<5 mg/day) glucocorticoids (GCs) in patients with RA treated with biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective cohort study, we included all RA patients who started their first b/tsDMARDs at our institution between 2015 and 2020 and were monitored every 6 months for 3 years. Relationships between exposure to very-low-dose GCs and disease activity were examined through multivariable logistic regression and repeated-measures analysis of variance. The impact of very-low-dose GCs on safety was also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 229 RA patients, of whom 68% were prescribed very-low-dose GCs and 32% received no GCs. After 3 years on b/tsDMARDs, 32% had never abandoned, 20% had gone on and off and 23% had permanently discontinued very-low-dose GCs, while 25% had never taken GCs. Shorter disease duration at b/tsDMARD initiation was the single modifiable predictor of very-low-dose GC cessation [odds ratio 1.1 (95% CI 1.03, 1.14) for any 1-year decrease; P = 0.001]. A significant association existed between ongoing utilization of very-low-dose GCs and persistent moderate disease activity. Use of very-low-dose GCs was associated with hypertension (20% vs 11%) and myocardial infarction (2.3% vs 0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A substantial proportion of RA patients treated with b/tsDMARDs continue to receive very-low-dose GCs without significantly improving disease control. However, this appears to increase cardiovascular morbidity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"501-508\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keae077\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keae077","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究目的我们研究了极低剂量抗炎药物的有效性和安全性:在这项前瞻性队列研究中,我们纳入了2015年至2020年期间在我院开始首次使用b/tsDMARDs的所有RA患者,并在3年内每6个月监测一次。我们通过多变量逻辑回归和重复测量方差分析研究了极低剂量 GCs 暴露与疾病活动性之间的关系。此外,还评估了极低剂量 GCs 对安全性的影响:我们招募了 229 名 RA 患者,其中 68% 的患者接受了超低剂量 GCs 治疗,32% 的患者未接受 GCs 治疗。服用 b/tsDMARDs 三年后,32% 的患者从未放弃过,20% 的患者服用过又停用,23% 的患者永久性停用了超低剂量 GCs,而 25% 的患者从未服用过 GCs。开始使用 b/tsDMARD 时的病程较短是预测停用极低剂量 GCs 的唯一可改变的因素(OR 1.1,95% CI 1.03-1.14,任何 1 年的减少;P= 0.001)。持续使用极低剂量 GCs 与持续中度疾病活动之间存在明显关联。极低剂量GCs的使用与高血压(20% vs 11%)和心肌梗死(2.3% vs 0%)有关:结论:相当一部分接受双/三嘧啶并用抗炎药(b/tsDMARDs)治疗的 RA 患者继续接受超低剂量 GCs 治疗,但疾病控制情况并未明显改善。然而,这似乎会增加心血管疾病的发病率。
Very-low-dose glucocorticoid therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: impact of b/tsDMARDs initiation timing on glucocorticoid withdrawal.
Objectives: We investigated the effectiveness and safety of very-low-dose (<5 mg/day) glucocorticoids (GCs) in patients with RA treated with biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs).
Methods: In this prospective cohort study, we included all RA patients who started their first b/tsDMARDs at our institution between 2015 and 2020 and were monitored every 6 months for 3 years. Relationships between exposure to very-low-dose GCs and disease activity were examined through multivariable logistic regression and repeated-measures analysis of variance. The impact of very-low-dose GCs on safety was also evaluated.
Results: We enrolled 229 RA patients, of whom 68% were prescribed very-low-dose GCs and 32% received no GCs. After 3 years on b/tsDMARDs, 32% had never abandoned, 20% had gone on and off and 23% had permanently discontinued very-low-dose GCs, while 25% had never taken GCs. Shorter disease duration at b/tsDMARD initiation was the single modifiable predictor of very-low-dose GC cessation [odds ratio 1.1 (95% CI 1.03, 1.14) for any 1-year decrease; P = 0.001]. A significant association existed between ongoing utilization of very-low-dose GCs and persistent moderate disease activity. Use of very-low-dose GCs was associated with hypertension (20% vs 11%) and myocardial infarction (2.3% vs 0%).
Conclusion: A substantial proportion of RA patients treated with b/tsDMARDs continue to receive very-low-dose GCs without significantly improving disease control. However, this appears to increase cardiovascular morbidity.
期刊介绍:
Rheumatology strives to support research and discovery by publishing the highest quality original scientific papers with a focus on basic, clinical and translational research. The journal’s subject areas cover a wide range of paediatric and adult rheumatological conditions from an international perspective. It is an official journal of the British Society for Rheumatology, published by Oxford University Press.
Rheumatology publishes original articles, reviews, editorials, guidelines, concise reports, meta-analyses, original case reports, clinical vignettes, letters and matters arising from published material. The journal takes pride in serving the global rheumatology community, with a focus on high societal impact in the form of podcasts, videos and extended social media presence, and utilizing metrics such as Altmetric. Keep up to date by following the journal on Twitter @RheumJnl.