质子泵抑制剂和钾竞争性酸阻滞剂对预测溃疡性早期胃癌内镜切除术治愈率的临床影响。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Digestion Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-02 DOI:10.1159/000536617
Konomu Uno, Takaya Shimura, Shingo Inaguma, Keita Kuroyanagi, Ruriko Nishigaki, Takuya Kanno, Makiko Sasaki, Shigeki Fukusada, Naomi Sugimura, Yusuke Mizuno, Takayuki Nukui, Yuki Kojima, Mamoru Tanaka, Keiji Ozeki, Eiji Kubota, Satoru Takahashi, Hiromi Kataoka
{"title":"质子泵抑制剂和钾竞争性酸阻滞剂对预测溃疡性早期胃癌内镜切除术治愈率的临床影响。","authors":"Konomu Uno, Takaya Shimura, Shingo Inaguma, Keita Kuroyanagi, Ruriko Nishigaki, Takuya Kanno, Makiko Sasaki, Shigeki Fukusada, Naomi Sugimura, Yusuke Mizuno, Takayuki Nukui, Yuki Kojima, Mamoru Tanaka, Keiji Ozeki, Eiji Kubota, Satoru Takahashi, Hiromi Kataoka","doi":"10.1159/000536617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endoscopic diagnosis is essential for predicting the curability of early gastric cancer (EGC; R0 resection) before treatment, but the relationship between ulcerative lesions and clinical outcomes remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the effect of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) on the morphological changes of ulcerative EGCs and its relevance to the clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Altogether, 143 patients with differentiated ulcerative EGC that were resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection were retrospectively identified and divided into the following two cohorts depending on their PPI/P-CAB administration status: PPI/P-CAB (n = 76) and non-PPI/P-CAB (n = 67) cohorts. Furthermore, in each cohort, the patients were further divided into the improved and unimproved subgroups based on the ulcerative changes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the PPI/P-CAB cohort, the deep submucosal invasion and lymphovascular invasion rates were significantly higher in the unimproved subgroup than in the improved subgroup, resulting in a significantly lower R0 resection rate. Contrarily, no significant differences were found between the two subgroups in the non-PPI/P-CAB cohort. The significance of PPI/P-CAB administration was observed only in the ulcerative EGCs with open-type atrophy (R0 resection rate; improved vs. unimproved, 90.9% vs. 48.0%, p = 0.001). When the finding of improved ulcer with PPI/P-CAB administration was used as the indication of endoscopic resection in ulcerative EGCs with open-type atrophy, high sensitivity (78.9%) and accuracy (76.3%) rates for the curability were observed, which were higher than those of conventional endoscopic diagnosis alone (p = 0.021).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PPI or P-CAB administration might contribute to the potential selection of ulcerative EGCs, enabling endoscopic curative resection.</p>","PeriodicalId":11315,"journal":{"name":"Digestion","volume":" ","pages":"192-200"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Impact of Proton Pump Inhibitor and Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker for Predicting the Curability of Endoscopic Resection in Ulcerative Early Gastric Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Konomu Uno, Takaya Shimura, Shingo Inaguma, Keita Kuroyanagi, Ruriko Nishigaki, Takuya Kanno, Makiko Sasaki, Shigeki Fukusada, Naomi Sugimura, Yusuke Mizuno, Takayuki Nukui, Yuki Kojima, Mamoru Tanaka, Keiji Ozeki, Eiji Kubota, Satoru Takahashi, Hiromi Kataoka\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000536617\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endoscopic diagnosis is essential for predicting the curability of early gastric cancer (EGC; R0 resection) before treatment, but the relationship between ulcerative lesions and clinical outcomes remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the effect of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) on the morphological changes of ulcerative EGCs and its relevance to the clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Altogether, 143 patients with differentiated ulcerative EGC that were resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection were retrospectively identified and divided into the following two cohorts depending on their PPI/P-CAB administration status: PPI/P-CAB (n = 76) and non-PPI/P-CAB (n = 67) cohorts. Furthermore, in each cohort, the patients were further divided into the improved and unimproved subgroups based on the ulcerative changes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the PPI/P-CAB cohort, the deep submucosal invasion and lymphovascular invasion rates were significantly higher in the unimproved subgroup than in the improved subgroup, resulting in a significantly lower R0 resection rate. Contrarily, no significant differences were found between the two subgroups in the non-PPI/P-CAB cohort. The significance of PPI/P-CAB administration was observed only in the ulcerative EGCs with open-type atrophy (R0 resection rate; improved vs. unimproved, 90.9% vs. 48.0%, p = 0.001). When the finding of improved ulcer with PPI/P-CAB administration was used as the indication of endoscopic resection in ulcerative EGCs with open-type atrophy, high sensitivity (78.9%) and accuracy (76.3%) rates for the curability were observed, which were higher than those of conventional endoscopic diagnosis alone (p = 0.021).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PPI or P-CAB administration might contribute to the potential selection of ulcerative EGCs, enabling endoscopic curative resection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"192-200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000536617\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000536617","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:内镜诊断对于在治疗前预测早期胃癌(EGC;R0切除)的治愈率至关重要,但溃疡性病变与临床预后之间的关系仍不清楚。我们旨在研究质子泵抑制剂(PPI)或钾竞争性酸阻滞剂(P-CAB)对溃疡性 EGC 形态学变化的影响及其与临床预后的相关性:回顾性鉴定了143例经内镜黏膜下剥离术切除的分化型溃疡性EGC患者,并根据患者服用PPI/P-CAB的情况分为以下两组:PPI/P-CAB组(76人)和非PPI/P-CAB组(67人)。此外,在每个组别中,根据溃疡变化情况将患者进一步分为好转亚组和未好转亚组:结果:在PPI/P-CAB队列中,未改善亚组的粘膜下深层侵犯率和淋巴管侵犯率明显高于改善亚组,导致R0切除率明显降低。相反,在非PPI/P-CAB队列中,两个亚组之间没有发现明显差异。仅在伴有开放型萎缩的溃疡性 EGC 中观察到使用 PPI/P-CAB 的重要性(R0 切除率;改善与未改善,90.9% 对 48.0%,P = 0.001)。当使用 PPI/P-CAB 后发现溃疡有所改善作为开放型萎缩的溃疡性 EGC 的内镜切除指征时,观察到治愈率的敏感性(78.9%)和准确性(76.3%)均高于单纯的传统内镜诊断(P = 0.021):结论:服用PPI或P-CAB可能有助于选择潜在的溃疡性EGC,从而实现内镜下根治性切除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Impact of Proton Pump Inhibitor and Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker for Predicting the Curability of Endoscopic Resection in Ulcerative Early Gastric Cancer.

Introduction: Endoscopic diagnosis is essential for predicting the curability of early gastric cancer (EGC; R0 resection) before treatment, but the relationship between ulcerative lesions and clinical outcomes remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the effect of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) on the morphological changes of ulcerative EGCs and its relevance to the clinical outcomes.

Methods: Altogether, 143 patients with differentiated ulcerative EGC that were resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection were retrospectively identified and divided into the following two cohorts depending on their PPI/P-CAB administration status: PPI/P-CAB (n = 76) and non-PPI/P-CAB (n = 67) cohorts. Furthermore, in each cohort, the patients were further divided into the improved and unimproved subgroups based on the ulcerative changes.

Results: In the PPI/P-CAB cohort, the deep submucosal invasion and lymphovascular invasion rates were significantly higher in the unimproved subgroup than in the improved subgroup, resulting in a significantly lower R0 resection rate. Contrarily, no significant differences were found between the two subgroups in the non-PPI/P-CAB cohort. The significance of PPI/P-CAB administration was observed only in the ulcerative EGCs with open-type atrophy (R0 resection rate; improved vs. unimproved, 90.9% vs. 48.0%, p = 0.001). When the finding of improved ulcer with PPI/P-CAB administration was used as the indication of endoscopic resection in ulcerative EGCs with open-type atrophy, high sensitivity (78.9%) and accuracy (76.3%) rates for the curability were observed, which were higher than those of conventional endoscopic diagnosis alone (p = 0.021).

Conclusion: PPI or P-CAB administration might contribute to the potential selection of ulcerative EGCs, enabling endoscopic curative resection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digestion
Digestion 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Digestion'' concentrates on clinical research reports: in addition to editorials and reviews, the journal features sections on Stomach/Esophagus, Bowel, Neuro-Gastroenterology, Liver/Bile, Pancreas, Metabolism/Nutrition and Gastrointestinal Oncology. Papers cover physiology in humans, metabolic studies and clinical work on the etiology, diagnosis, and therapy of human diseases. It is thus especially cut out for gastroenterologists employed in hospitals and outpatient units. Moreover, the journal''s coverage of studies on the metabolism and effects of therapeutic drugs carries considerable value for clinicians and investigators beyond the immediate field of gastroenterology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信