静脉注射免疫球蛋白治疗自身免疫性体位性正位性心动过速综合征(iSTAND)的随机对照试验。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Clinical Autonomic Research Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-04 DOI:10.1007/s10286-024-01020-9
Steven Vernino, Steve Hopkins, Meredith Bryarly, Roberto S Hernandez, Amber Salter
{"title":"静脉注射免疫球蛋白治疗自身免疫性体位性正位性心动过速综合征(iSTAND)的随机对照试验。","authors":"Steven Vernino, Steve Hopkins, Meredith Bryarly, Roberto S Hernandez, Amber Salter","doi":"10.1007/s10286-024-01020-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study assesses response to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in presumed autoimmune postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>POTS may be associated with autoimmune disorders, serum autoantibodies, or recent infection. Uncontrolled case studies suggest that IVIG is beneficial for treating autoimmune POTS. No previous randomized controlled trials have been conducted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-site randomized controlled trial compared IVIG with intravenous albumin infusions. Albumin comparator ensured blinding and control for effects of volume expansion. Eligible patients with POTS had COMPASS-31 total weighted score ≥ 40 and met predetermined criteria suggesting autoimmunity. Over 12 weeks, participants received eight infusions (0.4 gm/kg each). Four infusions were given weekly followed by four infusions every other week. Primary outcome measure was improvement in COMPASS-31 2 weeks after final infusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 50 participants consented; 30 met inclusion criteria and received study drug (16 IVIG and 14 albumin; 29 female). Group baseline characteristics were well matched; 27 participants completed treatment protocol. Change in COMPASS-31 did not differ between groups (median change [IQR]; IVIG: -5.5 [-23.3, 2.5] versus albumin: -10.6 [-14.1, -4.7]; p-value = 0.629). The IVIG group had a higher response rate (46.7% versus 38.5%), but this was not statistically significant. Adverse events were common but usually mild and did not differ between treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This small randomized controlled trial of IVIG in POTS found no statistical difference in response compared with albumin infusion. Both groups showed improvement possibly related to volume expansion or other effects obscuring group differences. These findings inform development of future immunomodulatory clinical trials in POTS.</p>","PeriodicalId":10168,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Autonomic Research","volume":" ","pages":"153-163"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomized controlled trial of intravenous immunoglobulin for autoimmune postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (iSTAND).\",\"authors\":\"Steven Vernino, Steve Hopkins, Meredith Bryarly, Roberto S Hernandez, Amber Salter\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10286-024-01020-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study assesses response to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in presumed autoimmune postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>POTS may be associated with autoimmune disorders, serum autoantibodies, or recent infection. Uncontrolled case studies suggest that IVIG is beneficial for treating autoimmune POTS. No previous randomized controlled trials have been conducted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-site randomized controlled trial compared IVIG with intravenous albumin infusions. Albumin comparator ensured blinding and control for effects of volume expansion. Eligible patients with POTS had COMPASS-31 total weighted score ≥ 40 and met predetermined criteria suggesting autoimmunity. Over 12 weeks, participants received eight infusions (0.4 gm/kg each). Four infusions were given weekly followed by four infusions every other week. Primary outcome measure was improvement in COMPASS-31 2 weeks after final infusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 50 participants consented; 30 met inclusion criteria and received study drug (16 IVIG and 14 albumin; 29 female). Group baseline characteristics were well matched; 27 participants completed treatment protocol. Change in COMPASS-31 did not differ between groups (median change [IQR]; IVIG: -5.5 [-23.3, 2.5] versus albumin: -10.6 [-14.1, -4.7]; p-value = 0.629). The IVIG group had a higher response rate (46.7% versus 38.5%), but this was not statistically significant. Adverse events were common but usually mild and did not differ between treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This small randomized controlled trial of IVIG in POTS found no statistical difference in response compared with albumin infusion. Both groups showed improvement possibly related to volume expansion or other effects obscuring group differences. These findings inform development of future immunomodulatory clinical trials in POTS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Autonomic Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"153-163\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Autonomic Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10286-024-01020-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Autonomic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10286-024-01020-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究评估假定自身免疫性体位性正位性心动过速综合征(POTS)患者对静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)的反应:本研究评估假定自身免疫性体位性正位性心动过速综合征(POTS)患者对静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)的反应:背景:POTS 可能与自身免疫性疾病、血清自身抗体或近期感染有关。无对照病例研究表明,IVIG 对治疗自身免疫性 POTS 有益。此前尚未进行过随机对照试验:这项单点随机对照试验对 IVIG 和静脉注射白蛋白进行了比较。白蛋白参照物确保了盲法和对容量扩张影响的控制。符合条件的 POTS 患者 COMPASS-31 加权总分≥ 40 分,并符合提示自身免疫的预定标准。在 12 周内,参与者接受了 8 次输液(每次 0.4 克/千克)。每周输注四次,然后每隔一周输注四次。主要结果指标为最后一次输液后 2 周 COMPASS-31 的改善情况:共有 50 名参与者同意接受研究,其中 30 人符合纳入标准并接受了研究药物(16 人接受了 IVIG,14 人接受了白蛋白;29 人为女性)。各组基线特征完全匹配;27 名参与者完成了治疗方案。COMPASS-31的变化在各组之间没有差异(变化中位数[IQR];IVIG:-5.5 [-23.3, 2.5]对白蛋白:-10.6 [-14.1, -4.7];P值 = 0.629)。IVIG 组的反应率更高(46.7% 对 38.5%),但无统计学意义。不良反应很常见,但通常较轻,治疗组之间没有差异:这项针对 POTS 的 IVIG 小规模随机对照试验发现,与白蛋白输注相比,两组患者的反应没有统计学差异。两组患者的病情均有改善,这可能与血容量扩张或其他影响掩盖了组间差异有关。这些发现为今后开展 POTS 免疫调节临床试验提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Randomized controlled trial of intravenous immunoglobulin for autoimmune postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (iSTAND).

Randomized controlled trial of intravenous immunoglobulin for autoimmune postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (iSTAND).

Objective: This study assesses response to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in presumed autoimmune postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS).

Background: POTS may be associated with autoimmune disorders, serum autoantibodies, or recent infection. Uncontrolled case studies suggest that IVIG is beneficial for treating autoimmune POTS. No previous randomized controlled trials have been conducted.

Methods: This single-site randomized controlled trial compared IVIG with intravenous albumin infusions. Albumin comparator ensured blinding and control for effects of volume expansion. Eligible patients with POTS had COMPASS-31 total weighted score ≥ 40 and met predetermined criteria suggesting autoimmunity. Over 12 weeks, participants received eight infusions (0.4 gm/kg each). Four infusions were given weekly followed by four infusions every other week. Primary outcome measure was improvement in COMPASS-31 2 weeks after final infusion.

Results: A total of 50 participants consented; 30 met inclusion criteria and received study drug (16 IVIG and 14 albumin; 29 female). Group baseline characteristics were well matched; 27 participants completed treatment protocol. Change in COMPASS-31 did not differ between groups (median change [IQR]; IVIG: -5.5 [-23.3, 2.5] versus albumin: -10.6 [-14.1, -4.7]; p-value = 0.629). The IVIG group had a higher response rate (46.7% versus 38.5%), but this was not statistically significant. Adverse events were common but usually mild and did not differ between treatment groups.

Conclusions: This small randomized controlled trial of IVIG in POTS found no statistical difference in response compared with albumin infusion. Both groups showed improvement possibly related to volume expansion or other effects obscuring group differences. These findings inform development of future immunomodulatory clinical trials in POTS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Autonomic Research
Clinical Autonomic Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Autonomic Research aims to draw together and disseminate research work from various disciplines and specialties dealing with clinical problems resulting from autonomic dysfunction. Areas to be covered include: cardiovascular system, neurology, diabetes, endocrinology, urology, pain disorders, ophthalmology, gastroenterology, toxicology and clinical pharmacology, skin infectious diseases, renal disease. This journal is an essential source of new information for everyone working in areas involving the autonomic nervous system. A major feature of Clinical Autonomic Research is its speed of publication coupled with the highest refereeing standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信