高速车辆碰撞中的行人动态反应和受伤风险。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS
Jin Nie, Xiaojiang Lv, Xing Huang, Kui Li, Guibing Li
{"title":"高速车辆碰撞中的行人动态反应和受伤风险。","authors":"Jin Nie, Xiaojiang Lv, Xing Huang, Kui Li, Guibing Li","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of the current study is to understand pedestrian kinematics, biomechanical response and injury risk in high speed vehicle crashes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Vehicle-to-pedestrian crashes at the impact speeds of 40 km/h (reference set) and 70 km/h (analysis set) were simulated employing FE models of a sedan front and an SUV front together with a pedestrian FE model developed using hollow structures. The predictions from crash simulations of different vehicle types and impact speeds were compared and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In crashes at 70 km/h, pedestrian head-vehicle contact velocity is by about 20-30% higher than the vehicle impact speed, the peak head angular velocity exceeds 100 rad/s and is close to the instant of head-vehicle contact, brain strain appears two peaks and the second peak (after head contact) is obviously higher than the first (before head contact), and AIS4+ head injury risk is above 50%, excessive thorax compression induces rib fractures and lung compression, both sedan and SUV cases show a high risk (>70%) of AIS3 + thorax injury, and the risk of AIS4 + thorax injury is lower than 40% in the sedan case and higher than 50% for the SUV case.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pedestrians in vehicle crashes at 70 km/h have a higher AIS3 + /AIS4 + head and thorax injury risk, high vehicle impact speed is more easily to induce a high head angular velocity at the instant of head-vehicle contact, brain strain is strongly associated with the combined effect of head rotational velocity and acceleration, and pedestrian thorax injury risk is more sensitive to vehicle impact speed than the head.</p>","PeriodicalId":6897,"journal":{"name":"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics","volume":"24 3","pages":"57-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pedestrian dynamic response and injury risk in high speed vehicle crashes.\",\"authors\":\"Jin Nie, Xiaojiang Lv, Xing Huang, Kui Li, Guibing Li\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of the current study is to understand pedestrian kinematics, biomechanical response and injury risk in high speed vehicle crashes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Vehicle-to-pedestrian crashes at the impact speeds of 40 km/h (reference set) and 70 km/h (analysis set) were simulated employing FE models of a sedan front and an SUV front together with a pedestrian FE model developed using hollow structures. The predictions from crash simulations of different vehicle types and impact speeds were compared and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In crashes at 70 km/h, pedestrian head-vehicle contact velocity is by about 20-30% higher than the vehicle impact speed, the peak head angular velocity exceeds 100 rad/s and is close to the instant of head-vehicle contact, brain strain appears two peaks and the second peak (after head contact) is obviously higher than the first (before head contact), and AIS4+ head injury risk is above 50%, excessive thorax compression induces rib fractures and lung compression, both sedan and SUV cases show a high risk (>70%) of AIS3 + thorax injury, and the risk of AIS4 + thorax injury is lower than 40% in the sedan case and higher than 50% for the SUV case.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pedestrians in vehicle crashes at 70 km/h have a higher AIS3 + /AIS4 + head and thorax injury risk, high vehicle impact speed is more easily to induce a high head angular velocity at the instant of head-vehicle contact, brain strain is strongly associated with the combined effect of head rotational velocity and acceleration, and pedestrian thorax injury risk is more sensitive to vehicle impact speed than the head.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"24 3\",\"pages\":\"57-67\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在了解高速车辆碰撞中的行人运动学、生物力学反应和受伤风险:方法:使用轿车前部和越野车前部的 FE 模型以及使用空心结构开发的行人 FE 模型,模拟了撞击速度为 40 km/h (参考集)和 70 km/h (分析集)的车辆与行人碰撞。对不同车辆类型和撞击速度下的碰撞模拟预测结果进行了比较和分析:结果:在时速 70 公里的碰撞中,行人头车接触速度比车辆撞击速度高出约 20-30%,头部角速度峰值超过 100 弧度/秒,且接近头车接触瞬间,脑应变出现两个峰值,且第二个峰值(头部接触后)明显高于第一个峰值(头部接触前)、过度的胸部挤压会导致肋骨骨折和肺部挤压,轿车和 SUV 案例均显示出 AIS3 + 胸部损伤的高风险(>70%),轿车案例中 AIS4 + 胸部损伤的风险低于 40%,而 SUV 案例中 AIS4 + 胸部损伤的风险高于 50%。结论在时速 70 公里的车辆碰撞中,行人的 AIS3 + /AIS4 + 头部和胸部损伤风险较高,高车辆撞击速度更容易在头部与车辆接触的瞬间引起较高的头部角速度,脑损伤与头部旋转速度和加速度的综合效应密切相关,行人胸部损伤风险对车辆撞击速度的敏感性高于头部。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pedestrian dynamic response and injury risk in high speed vehicle crashes.

Purpose: The purpose of the current study is to understand pedestrian kinematics, biomechanical response and injury risk in high speed vehicle crashes.

Methods: Vehicle-to-pedestrian crashes at the impact speeds of 40 km/h (reference set) and 70 km/h (analysis set) were simulated employing FE models of a sedan front and an SUV front together with a pedestrian FE model developed using hollow structures. The predictions from crash simulations of different vehicle types and impact speeds were compared and analyzed.

Results: In crashes at 70 km/h, pedestrian head-vehicle contact velocity is by about 20-30% higher than the vehicle impact speed, the peak head angular velocity exceeds 100 rad/s and is close to the instant of head-vehicle contact, brain strain appears two peaks and the second peak (after head contact) is obviously higher than the first (before head contact), and AIS4+ head injury risk is above 50%, excessive thorax compression induces rib fractures and lung compression, both sedan and SUV cases show a high risk (>70%) of AIS3 + thorax injury, and the risk of AIS4 + thorax injury is lower than 40% in the sedan case and higher than 50% for the SUV case.

Conclusions: Pedestrians in vehicle crashes at 70 km/h have a higher AIS3 + /AIS4 + head and thorax injury risk, high vehicle impact speed is more easily to induce a high head angular velocity at the instant of head-vehicle contact, brain strain is strongly associated with the combined effect of head rotational velocity and acceleration, and pedestrian thorax injury risk is more sensitive to vehicle impact speed than the head.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics
Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics BIOPHYSICS-ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics is a platform allowing presentation of investigations results, exchange of ideas and experiences among researchers with technical and medical background. Papers published in Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: Tissue Biomechanics, Orthopedic Biomechanics, Biomaterials, Sport Biomechanics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信