力量锻炼会影响肌肉氧饱和度反应吗?

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS
Claudia Miranda-Fuentes, Luis Chirosa-Rios, Isabel Guisado-Requena, Felipe García-Pinillos, Indya Del-Cuerpo, Antonio López-Fuenzalida, Paulina Ibacache-Saavedra, Daniel Jerez-Mayorga
{"title":"力量锻炼会影响肌肉氧饱和度反应吗?","authors":"Claudia Miranda-Fuentes, Luis Chirosa-Rios, Isabel Guisado-Requena, Felipe García-Pinillos, Indya Del-Cuerpo, Antonio López-Fuenzalida, Paulina Ibacache-Saavedra, Daniel Jerez-Mayorga","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective of the study was to describe and compare the acute response of muscle oxygen saturation (SmO2) and hemoglobin concentration (Hgb) in the vastus lateralis (VL) during resistance exercise protocols until failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixteen males were considered (mean ± SD, age = 36.12 ± 6.40 years). Two familiarization sessions and one evaluation session were carried out where three force protocols were executed in the VL, one of them was isometric load (P1) and two of dynamic load (P2 and P3). SmO2 [%] and Hgb [g/dL] were measured before and after each of these protocols. For P1, three series of 8 s of maximum isometric strength with the rest of 60 s between each set, the average isometric strength (AIS), and the isometric peak strength (IPS) were also recorded. After five minutes, P2 was performed, with an initial load of 40% of AIS. Then, at 30 minutes, P3 was performed considering an initial load of 40% of IPS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results suggest (I) minimum levels of SmO2 (66.31 ± 9.38%) and Hgb (12.22 ± 0.55 g/dL) during P2, (II) no significant differences were observed between the average loads of the respective protocols for SmO2 and (III) muscle Hgb differed significantly between rest with P1 and P3.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Exercises of increasing intensity and of short duration do not significantly modify SmO2. However, Hgb increases substantially compared baseline values.</p>","PeriodicalId":6897,"journal":{"name":"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can strength exercise affect the muscle oxygen saturation response?\",\"authors\":\"Claudia Miranda-Fuentes, Luis Chirosa-Rios, Isabel Guisado-Requena, Felipe García-Pinillos, Indya Del-Cuerpo, Antonio López-Fuenzalida, Paulina Ibacache-Saavedra, Daniel Jerez-Mayorga\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective of the study was to describe and compare the acute response of muscle oxygen saturation (SmO2) and hemoglobin concentration (Hgb) in the vastus lateralis (VL) during resistance exercise protocols until failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixteen males were considered (mean ± SD, age = 36.12 ± 6.40 years). Two familiarization sessions and one evaluation session were carried out where three force protocols were executed in the VL, one of them was isometric load (P1) and two of dynamic load (P2 and P3). SmO2 [%] and Hgb [g/dL] were measured before and after each of these protocols. For P1, three series of 8 s of maximum isometric strength with the rest of 60 s between each set, the average isometric strength (AIS), and the isometric peak strength (IPS) were also recorded. After five minutes, P2 was performed, with an initial load of 40% of AIS. Then, at 30 minutes, P3 was performed considering an initial load of 40% of IPS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results suggest (I) minimum levels of SmO2 (66.31 ± 9.38%) and Hgb (12.22 ± 0.55 g/dL) during P2, (II) no significant differences were observed between the average loads of the respective protocols for SmO2 and (III) muscle Hgb differed significantly between rest with P1 and P3.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Exercises of increasing intensity and of short duration do not significantly modify SmO2. However, Hgb increases substantially compared baseline values.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:该研究的目的是描述和比较在阻力运动方案直至失败期间,阔肌(VL)肌肉氧饱和度(SmO2)和血红蛋白浓度(Hgb)的急性反应:研究对象为 16 名男性(平均 ± SD,年龄 = 36.12 ± 6.40 岁)。方法:研究对象为 16 名男性(平均±标清,年龄 = 36.12 ± 6.40 岁),分别进行了两次熟悉训练和一次评估训练,在 VL 上执行了三个力量方案,其中一个为等长负荷(P1),两个为动态负荷(P2 和 P3)。每个方案前后都测量了血氧饱和度[%]和血红蛋白[g/dL]。对于 P1,还记录了三组 8 秒钟的最大等长力量(每组之间休息 60 秒)、平均等长力量(AIS)和等长峰值力量(IPS)。五分钟后,进行 P2,初始负荷为 AIS 的 40%。30 分钟后,进行 P3,初始负荷为 IPS 的 40%:结果表明:(I) P2 期间 SmO2(66.31 ± 9.38%)和 Hgb(12.22 ± 0.55 g/dL)达到最低水平;(II) 在 SmO2 方面,各方案的平均负荷之间未观察到显著差异;(III) 肌肉 Hgb 在 P1 和 P3 休息期间有显著差异:结论:强度不断增加且持续时间较短的运动不会明显改变 SmO2。然而,与基线值相比,Hgb 会大幅增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can strength exercise affect the muscle oxygen saturation response?

Purpose: The objective of the study was to describe and compare the acute response of muscle oxygen saturation (SmO2) and hemoglobin concentration (Hgb) in the vastus lateralis (VL) during resistance exercise protocols until failure.

Methods: Sixteen males were considered (mean ± SD, age = 36.12 ± 6.40 years). Two familiarization sessions and one evaluation session were carried out where three force protocols were executed in the VL, one of them was isometric load (P1) and two of dynamic load (P2 and P3). SmO2 [%] and Hgb [g/dL] were measured before and after each of these protocols. For P1, three series of 8 s of maximum isometric strength with the rest of 60 s between each set, the average isometric strength (AIS), and the isometric peak strength (IPS) were also recorded. After five minutes, P2 was performed, with an initial load of 40% of AIS. Then, at 30 minutes, P3 was performed considering an initial load of 40% of IPS.

Results: The results suggest (I) minimum levels of SmO2 (66.31 ± 9.38%) and Hgb (12.22 ± 0.55 g/dL) during P2, (II) no significant differences were observed between the average loads of the respective protocols for SmO2 and (III) muscle Hgb differed significantly between rest with P1 and P3.

Conclusions: Exercises of increasing intensity and of short duration do not significantly modify SmO2. However, Hgb increases substantially compared baseline values.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics
Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics BIOPHYSICS-ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics is a platform allowing presentation of investigations results, exchange of ideas and experiences among researchers with technical and medical background. Papers published in Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: Tissue Biomechanics, Orthopedic Biomechanics, Biomaterials, Sport Biomechanics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信