城市数字化的敏捷开发:从德累斯顿智慧城市战略的制定中获得的启示

IF 2.5 Q3 BUSINESS
Jörg Rainer Noennig, Filipe Mello Rose, Paul Stadelhofer, Anja Jannack, Swati Kulashri
{"title":"城市数字化的敏捷开发:从德累斯顿智慧城市战略的制定中获得的启示","authors":"Jörg Rainer Noennig, Filipe Mello Rose, Paul Stadelhofer, Anja Jannack, Swati Kulashri","doi":"10.1108/mbe-09-2023-0142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Digitalising cities requires new urban governance processes that account for rapidly changing environments and technological advances. In this context, agile development methods have become valuable, if not necessary. However, agile development contradicts public administration practices of risk aversion and long-term planning. The purpose of this study is to discuss practical avenues for navigating these two contradictions by adapting agile development to the needs of public sector organisations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The authors review the collaborative elaboration of Dresden’s smart city strategy as a critical case study. Dresden’s smart city strategy was developed using agile development and quadruple-helix innovation. The year-long co-creation process involved stakeholders from various groups to conceive an integrated and sustainable vision for digitalisation-based urban development.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Despite the apparent contradictions, this study finds that key aspects of agile development are feasible for public sector innovation. Firstly, risks can be strategically managed and distributed among administration and non-administration stakeholders. Secondly, while delivering value through short iterative loops, adherence to formal processes remains possible. Informal feedback cycles can be harmoniously combined with official statements, allowing iterative progress.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The empirical material is based on a single case study and thus risks overemphasising the general applicability of the proposed methods.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>This paper outlines practical steps to greater agility for public administration engaged in digitalising cities. The paper conceptualises a forward and lateral momentum for the agile development of a smart city strategy that aims to reconcile formal policymaking processes with short-term loops and risk aversion with experimental value creation. This approach balanced risks, created value and enhanced the strategy‘s alignment with strategic frameworks, ultimately promoting innovation in the public sector.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This paper proposes a novel, empirically grounded conceptualisation of implementing agile methods that explicitly recognises the peculiarities of public administrations. It conceptualises the orchestrated and pragmatic use of specific agile development methods to advance the digitalisation of cities.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":18468,"journal":{"name":"Measuring Business Excellence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agile development for urban digitalisation: insights from the creation of Dresden’s smart city strategy\",\"authors\":\"Jörg Rainer Noennig, Filipe Mello Rose, Paul Stadelhofer, Anja Jannack, Swati Kulashri\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/mbe-09-2023-0142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>Digitalising cities requires new urban governance processes that account for rapidly changing environments and technological advances. In this context, agile development methods have become valuable, if not necessary. However, agile development contradicts public administration practices of risk aversion and long-term planning. The purpose of this study is to discuss practical avenues for navigating these two contradictions by adapting agile development to the needs of public sector organisations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>The authors review the collaborative elaboration of Dresden’s smart city strategy as a critical case study. Dresden’s smart city strategy was developed using agile development and quadruple-helix innovation. The year-long co-creation process involved stakeholders from various groups to conceive an integrated and sustainable vision for digitalisation-based urban development.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>Despite the apparent contradictions, this study finds that key aspects of agile development are feasible for public sector innovation. Firstly, risks can be strategically managed and distributed among administration and non-administration stakeholders. Secondly, while delivering value through short iterative loops, adherence to formal processes remains possible. Informal feedback cycles can be harmoniously combined with official statements, allowing iterative progress.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\\n<p>The empirical material is based on a single case study and thus risks overemphasising the general applicability of the proposed methods.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>This paper outlines practical steps to greater agility for public administration engaged in digitalising cities. The paper conceptualises a forward and lateral momentum for the agile development of a smart city strategy that aims to reconcile formal policymaking processes with short-term loops and risk aversion with experimental value creation. This approach balanced risks, created value and enhanced the strategy‘s alignment with strategic frameworks, ultimately promoting innovation in the public sector.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This paper proposes a novel, empirically grounded conceptualisation of implementing agile methods that explicitly recognises the peculiarities of public administrations. It conceptualises the orchestrated and pragmatic use of specific agile development methods to advance the digitalisation of cities.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":18468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Measuring Business Excellence\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Measuring Business Excellence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/mbe-09-2023-0142\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Measuring Business Excellence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mbe-09-2023-0142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的城市数字化需要新的城市治理流程,以适应快速变化的环境和技术进步。在这种情况下,敏捷开发方法变得非常重要,甚至是必要的。然而,敏捷开发与公共行政规避风险和长期规划的做法相矛盾。本研究的目的是讨论如何通过调整敏捷开发以适应公共部门组织的需求,从而找到解决这两个矛盾的实用途径。德累斯顿的智慧城市战略是利用敏捷开发和四螺旋创新制定的。在长达一年的共同创造过程中,来自不同群体的利益相关者参与其中,为基于数字化的城市发展构想了一个综合的、可持续的愿景。研究结果尽管存在明显的矛盾,但本研究发现敏捷开发的关键方面对于公共部门的创新是可行的。首先,可以对风险进行战略管理,并在行政和非行政利益相关者之间进行分配。其次,在通过短期迭代循环实现价值的同时,遵守正式流程仍然是可能的。研究局限性/影响实证材料基于单一案例研究,因此有可能过分强调所建议方法的普遍适用性。本文为敏捷开发智慧城市战略构思了一种前进和横向动力,旨在协调正式决策过程与短期循环、规避风险与实验性价值创造之间的关系。这种方法平衡了风险,创造了价值,增强了战略与战略框架的一致性,最终促进了公共部门的创新。 原创性/价值 本文提出了一种新颖的、基于经验的敏捷方法实施概念,明确承认了公共管理的特殊性。它将特定敏捷开发方法的协调和务实使用概念化,以推进城市的数字化进程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Agile development for urban digitalisation: insights from the creation of Dresden’s smart city strategy

Purpose

Digitalising cities requires new urban governance processes that account for rapidly changing environments and technological advances. In this context, agile development methods have become valuable, if not necessary. However, agile development contradicts public administration practices of risk aversion and long-term planning. The purpose of this study is to discuss practical avenues for navigating these two contradictions by adapting agile development to the needs of public sector organisations.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors review the collaborative elaboration of Dresden’s smart city strategy as a critical case study. Dresden’s smart city strategy was developed using agile development and quadruple-helix innovation. The year-long co-creation process involved stakeholders from various groups to conceive an integrated and sustainable vision for digitalisation-based urban development.

Findings

Despite the apparent contradictions, this study finds that key aspects of agile development are feasible for public sector innovation. Firstly, risks can be strategically managed and distributed among administration and non-administration stakeholders. Secondly, while delivering value through short iterative loops, adherence to formal processes remains possible. Informal feedback cycles can be harmoniously combined with official statements, allowing iterative progress.

Research limitations/implications

The empirical material is based on a single case study and thus risks overemphasising the general applicability of the proposed methods.

Practical implications

This paper outlines practical steps to greater agility for public administration engaged in digitalising cities. The paper conceptualises a forward and lateral momentum for the agile development of a smart city strategy that aims to reconcile formal policymaking processes with short-term loops and risk aversion with experimental value creation. This approach balanced risks, created value and enhanced the strategy‘s alignment with strategic frameworks, ultimately promoting innovation in the public sector.

Originality/value

This paper proposes a novel, empirically grounded conceptualisation of implementing agile methods that explicitly recognises the peculiarities of public administrations. It conceptualises the orchestrated and pragmatic use of specific agile development methods to advance the digitalisation of cities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Measuring Business Excellence provides international insights into non-financial ways to measure and manage business performance improvements and company’s value creation dynamics. Measuring Business Excellence will enable you to apply best practice, implement innovative thinking and learn how to use different practices. Learn how to use innovative frameworks, approaches and practices for understanding, assessing and managing the strategic value drivers of business excellence. MBE publishes both rigorous academic research and insightful practical experiences about the development and adoption of assessment and management models, tools and approaches to support excellence and value creation of 21st century organizations both private and public.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信