高管非薪酬激励对企业绿色技术创新的异质性研究

IF 1.9 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Ning Xu, Di Zhang, Yutong Li, Yingjie Bai
{"title":"高管非薪酬激励对企业绿色技术创新的异质性研究","authors":"Ning Xu, Di Zhang, Yutong Li, Yingjie Bai","doi":"10.1108/cms-03-2023-0130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Green technology innovation is the organic combination of green development and innovation driven. It is also a powerful guarantee for shaping sustainable competitive advantages of manufacturing enterprises. To explore what kind of executive incentive contracts can truly stimulate green technology innovation, this study aims to distinguish the equity incentive and reputation incentive, upon their contractual elements characteristics and green governance effects, and then put forward suggestions for green technology innovation accordingly.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This study establishes an evaluation model and uses empirical methods to test. Concretely, using data from A-share listed manufacturing companies for the period from 2007 to 2020, this study compares and analyzes the impact of equity and reputation incentive on green technology innovation and explores the relationship between internal green business behavior and external green in depth.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>This study finds that reputation incentives focus on long-term and non-utilitarian orientation, which can promote green technology innovation in enterprises. While equity incentives, linked to performance indicators, have a inhibitory effect on green technology innovation. Internal and external institutional factors such as energy conservation measures, the “three wastes” management system, and environmental recognition play the regulatory role in the relationship between incentive contracts and green technology innovation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Those findings validate and expand the efficient contracting hypothesis and the rent extraction hypothesis from the perspective of green technology innovation and provide useful implications for the design of green governance systems in manufacturing enterprises.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":51675,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Management Studies","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research on the heterogeneity of executives’ nonsalary incentives on corporate green technology innovation\",\"authors\":\"Ning Xu, Di Zhang, Yutong Li, Yingjie Bai\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/cms-03-2023-0130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>Green technology innovation is the organic combination of green development and innovation driven. It is also a powerful guarantee for shaping sustainable competitive advantages of manufacturing enterprises. To explore what kind of executive incentive contracts can truly stimulate green technology innovation, this study aims to distinguish the equity incentive and reputation incentive, upon their contractual elements characteristics and green governance effects, and then put forward suggestions for green technology innovation accordingly.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>This study establishes an evaluation model and uses empirical methods to test. Concretely, using data from A-share listed manufacturing companies for the period from 2007 to 2020, this study compares and analyzes the impact of equity and reputation incentive on green technology innovation and explores the relationship between internal green business behavior and external green in depth.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>This study finds that reputation incentives focus on long-term and non-utilitarian orientation, which can promote green technology innovation in enterprises. While equity incentives, linked to performance indicators, have a inhibitory effect on green technology innovation. Internal and external institutional factors such as energy conservation measures, the “three wastes” management system, and environmental recognition play the regulatory role in the relationship between incentive contracts and green technology innovation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>Those findings validate and expand the efficient contracting hypothesis and the rent extraction hypothesis from the perspective of green technology innovation and provide useful implications for the design of green governance systems in manufacturing enterprises.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":51675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Management Studies\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Management Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/cms-03-2023-0130\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Management Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/cms-03-2023-0130","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的绿色技术创新是绿色发展与创新驱动的有机结合。绿色技术创新是绿色发展与创新驱动的有机结合,也是制造业企业塑造可持续竞争优势的有力保障。为探讨什么样的高管激励契约才能真正激发绿色技术创新,本研究旨在区分股权激励和声誉激励,从其契约要素特征和绿色治理效果出发,提出相应的绿色技术创新建议。具体而言,本研究利用 A 股制造业上市公司 2007 年至 2020 年的数据,比较分析了股权激励和声誉激励对绿色技术创新的影响,并深入探讨了企业内部绿色经营行为与外部绿色之间的关系。研究结果本研究发现,声誉激励注重长期性和非功利性导向,能够促进企业的绿色技术创新。而与绩效指标挂钩的股权激励对绿色技术创新有抑制作用。节能措施、"三废 "治理制度、环境认可度等内外部制度因素在激励契约与绿色技术创新的关系中发挥着调节作用。 原创性/价值这些发现从绿色技术创新的角度验证并拓展了有效契约假说和租金提取假说,为制造业企业绿色治理制度的设计提供了有益启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Research on the heterogeneity of executives’ nonsalary incentives on corporate green technology innovation

Purpose

Green technology innovation is the organic combination of green development and innovation driven. It is also a powerful guarantee for shaping sustainable competitive advantages of manufacturing enterprises. To explore what kind of executive incentive contracts can truly stimulate green technology innovation, this study aims to distinguish the equity incentive and reputation incentive, upon their contractual elements characteristics and green governance effects, and then put forward suggestions for green technology innovation accordingly.

Design/methodology/approach

This study establishes an evaluation model and uses empirical methods to test. Concretely, using data from A-share listed manufacturing companies for the period from 2007 to 2020, this study compares and analyzes the impact of equity and reputation incentive on green technology innovation and explores the relationship between internal green business behavior and external green in depth.

Findings

This study finds that reputation incentives focus on long-term and non-utilitarian orientation, which can promote green technology innovation in enterprises. While equity incentives, linked to performance indicators, have a inhibitory effect on green technology innovation. Internal and external institutional factors such as energy conservation measures, the “three wastes” management system, and environmental recognition play the regulatory role in the relationship between incentive contracts and green technology innovation.

Originality/value

Those findings validate and expand the efficient contracting hypothesis and the rent extraction hypothesis from the perspective of green technology innovation and provide useful implications for the design of green governance systems in manufacturing enterprises.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
13.60%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信