人工智能检测和分割模型:磁共振成像中脑肿瘤的系统回顾和元分析

Ting-Wei Wang MD, PhD , Yu-Chieh Shiao MD , Jia-Sheng Hong PhD , Wei-Kai Lee PhD , Ming-Sheng Hsu MD , Hao-Min Cheng MD, PhD , Huai-Che Yang MD, PhD , Cheng-Chia Lee MD, PhD , Hung-Chuan Pan MD, PhD , Weir Chiang You MD, PhD , Jiing-Feng Lirng MD , Wan-Yuo Guo MD, PhD , Yu-Te Wu PhD
{"title":"人工智能检测和分割模型:磁共振成像中脑肿瘤的系统回顾和元分析","authors":"Ting-Wei Wang MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yu-Chieh Shiao MD ,&nbsp;Jia-Sheng Hong PhD ,&nbsp;Wei-Kai Lee PhD ,&nbsp;Ming-Sheng Hsu MD ,&nbsp;Hao-Min Cheng MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Huai-Che Yang MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Cheng-Chia Lee MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Hung-Chuan Pan MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Weir Chiang You MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jiing-Feng Lirng MD ,&nbsp;Wan-Yuo Guo MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yu-Te Wu PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.mcpdig.2024.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To thoroughly analyze factors affecting the generalization ability of deep learning algorithms on brain tumor detection and segmentation models.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and IEEE from inception to July 25, 2023, and 19 studies with 12,000 patients were identified. The criteria required studies to use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for brain tumor detection and segmentation, offer clear performance metrics, and use external validation data sets. The study focused on outcomes such as sensitivity and Dice score. Study quality was assessed using QUADAS-2 and CLAIM tools. The meta-analysis evaluated varying algorithms and their performance across different validation data sets.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>MRI hardware as the manufacturer may contribute to data set diversity, impacting AI model generalizability. The study found that the best algorithms had a pooled lesion-wise Dice score of 84%, with pooled sensitivities of 87% (patient-wise) and 86% (lesion-wise). Post-2022 methodologies highlighted evolving artificial intelligence techniques. Performance differences were evident among tumor types, likely due to size disparities. 3D models outperformed their 2D and ensemble counterparts in detection. Although specific preprocessing techniques improved segmentation outcomes, some hindered detection.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study underscores the potential of deep learning in improving brain tumor diagnostics and treatment planning. We also identify the need for further research, including developing a comprehensive diversity index, expanded meta-analyses, and using generative adversarial networks for data diversification, paving the way for AI-driven advancements in oncological patient care.</p></div><div><h3>Trial Registration</h3><p>PROPERO (CRD42023459108).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74127,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health","volume":"2 1","pages":"Pages 75-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949761224000038/pdfft?md5=462accb0c195aebed809efe8ef0de1df&pid=1-s2.0-S2949761224000038-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial Intelligence Detection and Segmentation Models: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Brain Tumors in Magnetic Resonance Imaging\",\"authors\":\"Ting-Wei Wang MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yu-Chieh Shiao MD ,&nbsp;Jia-Sheng Hong PhD ,&nbsp;Wei-Kai Lee PhD ,&nbsp;Ming-Sheng Hsu MD ,&nbsp;Hao-Min Cheng MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Huai-Che Yang MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Cheng-Chia Lee MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Hung-Chuan Pan MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Weir Chiang You MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jiing-Feng Lirng MD ,&nbsp;Wan-Yuo Guo MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yu-Te Wu PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mcpdig.2024.01.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To thoroughly analyze factors affecting the generalization ability of deep learning algorithms on brain tumor detection and segmentation models.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and IEEE from inception to July 25, 2023, and 19 studies with 12,000 patients were identified. The criteria required studies to use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for brain tumor detection and segmentation, offer clear performance metrics, and use external validation data sets. The study focused on outcomes such as sensitivity and Dice score. Study quality was assessed using QUADAS-2 and CLAIM tools. The meta-analysis evaluated varying algorithms and their performance across different validation data sets.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>MRI hardware as the manufacturer may contribute to data set diversity, impacting AI model generalizability. The study found that the best algorithms had a pooled lesion-wise Dice score of 84%, with pooled sensitivities of 87% (patient-wise) and 86% (lesion-wise). Post-2022 methodologies highlighted evolving artificial intelligence techniques. Performance differences were evident among tumor types, likely due to size disparities. 3D models outperformed their 2D and ensemble counterparts in detection. Although specific preprocessing techniques improved segmentation outcomes, some hindered detection.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study underscores the potential of deep learning in improving brain tumor diagnostics and treatment planning. We also identify the need for further research, including developing a comprehensive diversity index, expanded meta-analyses, and using generative adversarial networks for data diversification, paving the way for AI-driven advancements in oncological patient care.</p></div><div><h3>Trial Registration</h3><p>PROPERO (CRD42023459108).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 75-91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949761224000038/pdfft?md5=462accb0c195aebed809efe8ef0de1df&pid=1-s2.0-S2949761224000038-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949761224000038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949761224000038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的深入分析影响深度学习算法对脑肿瘤检测和分割模型的泛化能力的因素。患者和方法我们检索了从开始到2023年7月25日的PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane Library和IEEE,共发现19项研究,涉及12000名患者。研究标准要求研究使用磁共振成像(MRI)进行脑肿瘤检测和分割,提供明确的性能指标,并使用外部验证数据集。研究重点关注灵敏度和 Dice 评分等结果。研究质量采用 QUADAS-2 和 CLAIM 工具进行评估。荟萃分析评估了不同算法及其在不同验证数据集上的性能。结果MRI 硬件作为制造商可能会导致数据集的多样性,从而影响人工智能模型的通用性。研究发现,最佳算法在病灶方面的集合 Dice 得分为 84%,集合敏感度为 87%(患者方面)和 86%(病灶方面)。2022 年后的方法突出了不断发展的人工智能技术。不同肿瘤类型的性能差异明显,这可能是由于肿瘤大小不同造成的。三维模型的检测结果优于二维模型和集合模型。虽然特定的预处理技术提高了分割结果,但有些技术却阻碍了检测。我们还发现了进一步研究的必要性,包括开发全面的多样性指数、扩大荟萃分析以及使用生成对抗网络进行数据多样化,从而为人工智能驱动的肿瘤患者护理进步铺平道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial Intelligence Detection and Segmentation Models: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Brain Tumors in Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Objective

To thoroughly analyze factors affecting the generalization ability of deep learning algorithms on brain tumor detection and segmentation models.

Patients and Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and IEEE from inception to July 25, 2023, and 19 studies with 12,000 patients were identified. The criteria required studies to use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for brain tumor detection and segmentation, offer clear performance metrics, and use external validation data sets. The study focused on outcomes such as sensitivity and Dice score. Study quality was assessed using QUADAS-2 and CLAIM tools. The meta-analysis evaluated varying algorithms and their performance across different validation data sets.

Results

MRI hardware as the manufacturer may contribute to data set diversity, impacting AI model generalizability. The study found that the best algorithms had a pooled lesion-wise Dice score of 84%, with pooled sensitivities of 87% (patient-wise) and 86% (lesion-wise). Post-2022 methodologies highlighted evolving artificial intelligence techniques. Performance differences were evident among tumor types, likely due to size disparities. 3D models outperformed their 2D and ensemble counterparts in detection. Although specific preprocessing techniques improved segmentation outcomes, some hindered detection.

Conclusion

The study underscores the potential of deep learning in improving brain tumor diagnostics and treatment planning. We also identify the need for further research, including developing a comprehensive diversity index, expanded meta-analyses, and using generative adversarial networks for data diversification, paving the way for AI-driven advancements in oncological patient care.

Trial Registration

PROPERO (CRD42023459108).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health
Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health Medicine and Dentistry (General), Health Informatics, Public Health and Health Policy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信