针对农村人口抑郁和焦虑症的移动医疗干预措施的可行性和实用性:范围审查

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Michael J. McCarthy , Alexandra Wicker , Juliette Roddy , Mark Remiker , Indrakshi Roy , Megan McCoy , Eric S. Cerino , Julie Baldwin
{"title":"针对农村人口抑郁和焦虑症的移动医疗干预措施的可行性和实用性:范围审查","authors":"Michael J. McCarthy ,&nbsp;Alexandra Wicker ,&nbsp;Juliette Roddy ,&nbsp;Mark Remiker ,&nbsp;Indrakshi Roy ,&nbsp;Megan McCoy ,&nbsp;Eric S. Cerino ,&nbsp;Julie Baldwin","doi":"10.1016/j.invent.2024.100724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite the potential of mobile health (mHealth) to address high rates of depression and anxiety in underserved rural communities, most mHealth interventions do not explicitly consider the realities of rural life. The aim of this scoping review is to identify and examine the available literature on mHealth interventions that consider the needs of rural populations in order to gauge their feasibility and utility for addressing depression and anxiety. Additionally, we provide an overview of rural users' perceptions about and preferences for mHealth-delivered mental health screening and intervention systems. Out of 169 articles identified, 16 met inclusion criteria. Studies were conducted across a wide range of countries, age groups, and rural subpopulations including individuals with bipolar disorder, anxiety, perinatal depression, PTSD, and chronic pain, as well as refugees, veterans, and transgender and LGBTQ+ individuals. All interventions were in the feasibility/acceptability testing stage for rural users. Identified strengths included their simplicity, accessibility, convenience, availability of support between sessions with providers, and remote access to a care team. Weaknesses included problems with charging phone batteries and exceeding data limits, privacy concerns, and general lack of comfort with app-based support. Based upon this review, we provide recommendations for future mHealth intervention development including the value of developer-user coproduction methods, the need to consider user variation in access to and comfort with smartphones, and potential data or connectivity limitations, mental health stigma, and confidentiality concerns in rural communities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48615,"journal":{"name":"Internet Interventions-The Application of Information Technology in Mental and Behavioural Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214782924000174/pdfft?md5=bb7f9ea9435f78b73bd5e30ab730f803&pid=1-s2.0-S2214782924000174-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility and utility of mobile health interventions for depression and anxiety in rural populations: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Michael J. McCarthy ,&nbsp;Alexandra Wicker ,&nbsp;Juliette Roddy ,&nbsp;Mark Remiker ,&nbsp;Indrakshi Roy ,&nbsp;Megan McCoy ,&nbsp;Eric S. Cerino ,&nbsp;Julie Baldwin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.invent.2024.100724\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Despite the potential of mobile health (mHealth) to address high rates of depression and anxiety in underserved rural communities, most mHealth interventions do not explicitly consider the realities of rural life. The aim of this scoping review is to identify and examine the available literature on mHealth interventions that consider the needs of rural populations in order to gauge their feasibility and utility for addressing depression and anxiety. Additionally, we provide an overview of rural users' perceptions about and preferences for mHealth-delivered mental health screening and intervention systems. Out of 169 articles identified, 16 met inclusion criteria. Studies were conducted across a wide range of countries, age groups, and rural subpopulations including individuals with bipolar disorder, anxiety, perinatal depression, PTSD, and chronic pain, as well as refugees, veterans, and transgender and LGBTQ+ individuals. All interventions were in the feasibility/acceptability testing stage for rural users. Identified strengths included their simplicity, accessibility, convenience, availability of support between sessions with providers, and remote access to a care team. Weaknesses included problems with charging phone batteries and exceeding data limits, privacy concerns, and general lack of comfort with app-based support. Based upon this review, we provide recommendations for future mHealth intervention development including the value of developer-user coproduction methods, the need to consider user variation in access to and comfort with smartphones, and potential data or connectivity limitations, mental health stigma, and confidentiality concerns in rural communities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internet Interventions-The Application of Information Technology in Mental and Behavioural Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214782924000174/pdfft?md5=bb7f9ea9435f78b73bd5e30ab730f803&pid=1-s2.0-S2214782924000174-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internet Interventions-The Application of Information Technology in Mental and Behavioural Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214782924000174\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Interventions-The Application of Information Technology in Mental and Behavioural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214782924000174","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管移动医疗(mHealth)具有解决服务不足的农村社区抑郁和焦虑高发问题的潜力,但大多数移动医疗干预措施并未明确考虑农村生活的实际情况。本范围综述旨在识别和研究有关考虑到农村人口需求的移动医疗干预措施的现有文献,以衡量其在解决抑郁和焦虑问题方面的可行性和实用性。此外,我们还概述了农村用户对移动医疗提供的心理健康筛查和干预系统的看法和偏好。在确定的 169 篇文章中,有 16 篇符合纳入标准。研究涉及多个国家、年龄组和农村亚人群,包括躁郁症、焦虑症、围产期抑郁症、创伤后应激障碍和慢性疼痛患者,以及难民、退伍军人、变性人和 LGBTQ+ 人士。所有干预措施对农村用户来说都处于可行性/可接受性测试阶段。已确定的优点包括:简单、易用、方便、可在与提供者的会话之间提供支持,以及可远程访问护理团队。不足之处包括手机电池充电和数据超限问题、隐私问题以及对基于应用程序的支持普遍缺乏舒适感。基于本次回顾,我们为未来移动医疗干预的开发提供了建议,包括开发者与用户共同开发方法的价值、考虑用户在使用智能手机的机会和舒适度方面的差异的必要性、农村社区潜在的数据或连接限制、心理健康耻辱感以及保密问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility and utility of mobile health interventions for depression and anxiety in rural populations: A scoping review

Despite the potential of mobile health (mHealth) to address high rates of depression and anxiety in underserved rural communities, most mHealth interventions do not explicitly consider the realities of rural life. The aim of this scoping review is to identify and examine the available literature on mHealth interventions that consider the needs of rural populations in order to gauge their feasibility and utility for addressing depression and anxiety. Additionally, we provide an overview of rural users' perceptions about and preferences for mHealth-delivered mental health screening and intervention systems. Out of 169 articles identified, 16 met inclusion criteria. Studies were conducted across a wide range of countries, age groups, and rural subpopulations including individuals with bipolar disorder, anxiety, perinatal depression, PTSD, and chronic pain, as well as refugees, veterans, and transgender and LGBTQ+ individuals. All interventions were in the feasibility/acceptability testing stage for rural users. Identified strengths included their simplicity, accessibility, convenience, availability of support between sessions with providers, and remote access to a care team. Weaknesses included problems with charging phone batteries and exceeding data limits, privacy concerns, and general lack of comfort with app-based support. Based upon this review, we provide recommendations for future mHealth intervention development including the value of developer-user coproduction methods, the need to consider user variation in access to and comfort with smartphones, and potential data or connectivity limitations, mental health stigma, and confidentiality concerns in rural communities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
9.30%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the European Society for Research on Internet Interventions (ESRII) and the International Society for Research on Internet Interventions (ISRII). The aim of Internet Interventions is to publish scientific, peer-reviewed, high-impact research on Internet interventions and related areas. Internet Interventions welcomes papers on the following subjects: • Intervention studies targeting the promotion of mental health and featuring the Internet and/or technologies using the Internet as an underlying technology, e.g. computers, smartphone devices, tablets, sensors • Implementation and dissemination of Internet interventions • Integration of Internet interventions into existing systems of care • Descriptions of development and deployment infrastructures • Internet intervention methodology and theory papers • Internet-based epidemiology • Descriptions of new Internet-based technologies and experiments with clinical applications • Economics of internet interventions (cost-effectiveness) • Health care policy and Internet interventions • The role of culture in Internet intervention • Internet psychometrics • Ethical issues pertaining to Internet interventions and measurements • Human-computer interaction and usability research with clinical implications • Systematic reviews and meta-analysis on Internet interventions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信