特定晚期肿瘤成人患者的新一代测序趋势:真实世界证据评估

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Andrea Ferreira-Gonzalez , Brian Hocum , Gilbert Ko , Sohul Shuvo , Sreevalsa Appukkuttan , Svetlana Babajanyan
{"title":"特定晚期肿瘤成人患者的新一代测序趋势:真实世界证据评估","authors":"Andrea Ferreira-Gonzalez ,&nbsp;Brian Hocum ,&nbsp;Gilbert Ko ,&nbsp;Sohul Shuvo ,&nbsp;Sreevalsa Appukkuttan ,&nbsp;Svetlana Babajanyan","doi":"10.1016/j.jmoldx.2024.01.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There are limited data on the prevalence of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in the United States, especially in light of the increasing importance of identifying actionable oncogenic variants due to molecular biomarker–based therapy approvals. This retrospective study of adult patients with select metastatic solid tumors and central nervous system tumors from the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart US health care claims database (January 1, 2014, to June 30, 2021; <em>N</em> = 63,209) examined NGS use trends over time. A modest increase in NGS was observed across tumor types from 2015 (0.0% to 1.5%) to 2021 (2.1% to 17.4%). A similar increase in NGS rates was also observed across key periods; however, rates in the final key period remained &lt;10% for patients with breast, colorectal, head and neck, soft tissue sarcoma, and thyroid cancers, as well as central nervous system tumors. The median time to NGS from diagnosis was shortest among patients with non–small-cell lung cancer and longest for patients with breast cancer. Predictors of NGS varied by tumor type; test rates for minorities in select tumor types appeared comparable to the White population. Despite improving payer policies to expand coverage of NGS and molecular biomarker–based therapy approvals, NGS rates remained low across tumor types. Given the potential for improved patient outcomes with molecular biomarker–based therapy, further efforts to improve NGS rates are warranted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50128,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics","volume":"26 4","pages":"Pages 292-303"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525157824000114/pdfft?md5=f6bc1fb11cec3cd2e9b7bcb8752465d9&pid=1-s2.0-S1525157824000114-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Next-Generation Sequencing Trends among Adult Patients with Select Advanced Tumor Types\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Ferreira-Gonzalez ,&nbsp;Brian Hocum ,&nbsp;Gilbert Ko ,&nbsp;Sohul Shuvo ,&nbsp;Sreevalsa Appukkuttan ,&nbsp;Svetlana Babajanyan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmoldx.2024.01.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>There are limited data on the prevalence of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in the United States, especially in light of the increasing importance of identifying actionable oncogenic variants due to molecular biomarker–based therapy approvals. This retrospective study of adult patients with select metastatic solid tumors and central nervous system tumors from the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart US health care claims database (January 1, 2014, to June 30, 2021; <em>N</em> = 63,209) examined NGS use trends over time. A modest increase in NGS was observed across tumor types from 2015 (0.0% to 1.5%) to 2021 (2.1% to 17.4%). A similar increase in NGS rates was also observed across key periods; however, rates in the final key period remained &lt;10% for patients with breast, colorectal, head and neck, soft tissue sarcoma, and thyroid cancers, as well as central nervous system tumors. The median time to NGS from diagnosis was shortest among patients with non–small-cell lung cancer and longest for patients with breast cancer. Predictors of NGS varied by tumor type; test rates for minorities in select tumor types appeared comparable to the White population. Despite improving payer policies to expand coverage of NGS and molecular biomarker–based therapy approvals, NGS rates remained low across tumor types. Given the potential for improved patient outcomes with molecular biomarker–based therapy, further efforts to improve NGS rates are warranted.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics\",\"volume\":\"26 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 292-303\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525157824000114/pdfft?md5=f6bc1fb11cec3cd2e9b7bcb8752465d9&pid=1-s2.0-S1525157824000114-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525157824000114\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525157824000114","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有关美国下一代测序(NGS)普及率的数据很有限,特别是鉴于基于分子生物标记的疗法获批后,鉴定可操作的致癌变异变得越来越重要。这项回顾性研究从 Optum Clinformatics Data Mart 美国医疗保健索赔数据库(2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 6 月 30 日;N = 63209)中选取了部分转移性实体瘤和中枢神经系统肿瘤的成年患者,研究了 NGS 的使用随时间推移的趋势。从 2015 年(0.0% 至 1.5%)到 2021 年(2.1% 至 17.4%),各肿瘤类型的 NGS 均有小幅增长。各关键时期的 NGS 使用率也出现了类似的增长;然而,乳腺癌、结直肠癌、头颈癌、软组织肉瘤、甲状腺癌以及中枢神经系统肿瘤患者的 NGS 使用率在最后一个关键时期仍为 10%。非小细胞肺癌患者从确诊到 NGS 的中位时间最短,乳腺癌患者最长。NGS的预测因素因肿瘤类型而异;少数群体在特定肿瘤类型中的检测率似乎与白人相当。尽管支付方政策不断改善,扩大了 NGS 的覆盖范围,基于分子生物标记物的疗法也获得批准,但各肿瘤类型的 NGS 使用率仍然很低。鉴于基于分子生物标记物的疗法有可能改善患者的预后,因此有必要进一步努力提高 NGS 的检测率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Next-Generation Sequencing Trends among Adult Patients with Select Advanced Tumor Types

There are limited data on the prevalence of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in the United States, especially in light of the increasing importance of identifying actionable oncogenic variants due to molecular biomarker–based therapy approvals. This retrospective study of adult patients with select metastatic solid tumors and central nervous system tumors from the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart US health care claims database (January 1, 2014, to June 30, 2021; N = 63,209) examined NGS use trends over time. A modest increase in NGS was observed across tumor types from 2015 (0.0% to 1.5%) to 2021 (2.1% to 17.4%). A similar increase in NGS rates was also observed across key periods; however, rates in the final key period remained <10% for patients with breast, colorectal, head and neck, soft tissue sarcoma, and thyroid cancers, as well as central nervous system tumors. The median time to NGS from diagnosis was shortest among patients with non–small-cell lung cancer and longest for patients with breast cancer. Predictors of NGS varied by tumor type; test rates for minorities in select tumor types appeared comparable to the White population. Despite improving payer policies to expand coverage of NGS and molecular biomarker–based therapy approvals, NGS rates remained low across tumor types. Given the potential for improved patient outcomes with molecular biomarker–based therapy, further efforts to improve NGS rates are warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
2.40%
发文量
143
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, the official publication of the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP), co-owned by the American Society for Investigative Pathology (ASIP), seeks to publish high quality original papers on scientific advances in the translation and validation of molecular discoveries in medicine into the clinical diagnostic setting, and the description and application of technological advances in the field of molecular diagnostic medicine. The editors welcome for review articles that contain: novel discoveries or clinicopathologic correlations including studies in oncology, infectious diseases, inherited diseases, predisposition to disease, clinical informatics, or the description of polymorphisms linked to disease states or normal variations; the application of diagnostic methodologies in clinical trials; or the development of new or improved molecular methods which may be applied to diagnosis or monitoring of disease or disease predisposition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信