Victor Loyola de Souza Guevara, Raquel Freire Coêlho, Eileen Pfeiffer Flores
{"title":"对话式阅读理解(LuDiCa)对自闭症青少年及其同伴社交互动的影响","authors":"Victor Loyola de Souza Guevara, Raquel Freire Coêlho, Eileen Pfeiffer Flores","doi":"10.1186/s41155-023-00283-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In today’s contemporary world, relationships take a prominent role in the lives of adolescents. However, challenges related to mutual understanding and a lack of inclusive environments can often lead to autistic teens feeling excluded. In order to assess the impact of naturalistic interventions on interpersonal relationships, we conducted an experimental test utilizing Dialogic Reading for Comprehension (LuDiCa) in online reading circles with groups comprising both autistic and neurotypical adolescents. Our focus was on exploring its relevance for enhancing social interaction, particularly in terms of conversational acts, sharing experiences, initiations, and questions. Five autistic and five neurotypical students between 11 and 15 years old from a public school in Brasilia, Federal District, participated. We paired groups A and B (made up of trios of teenagers) and groups C and D (made up of pairs) in a multiple baseline design per reading group, in which all groups went through the baseline conditions (BL), intervention (LuDiCa) and maintenance. LuDiCa increased the frequency of conversational acts of both autistic participants and neurotypical peers. In addition, the intervention favored initiations, questions, and sharing experiences, through the shared activity of reading and talking about a work of fiction. Participants rated the intervention in relation to the platform, the book, the reading facilitator, and interaction with peers. We discuss the potential of the facilitator's role in favoring interactions and the potential of LuDiCa as a joint activity for the engagement of adolescents. We also include suggestions for future research focused on the online context and discuss some limitations of the LuDiCa intervention. In summary, our study offers initial experimental evidence demonstrating the positive impact of LuDiCa on social interaction behaviors among both autistic and neurotypical adolescents within an inclusive setting.","PeriodicalId":501897,"journal":{"name":"Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica / Psychology: Research and Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of dialogic reading for comprehension (LuDiCa) on the social interaction of autistic adolescents and their peers\",\"authors\":\"Victor Loyola de Souza Guevara, Raquel Freire Coêlho, Eileen Pfeiffer Flores\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41155-023-00283-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In today’s contemporary world, relationships take a prominent role in the lives of adolescents. However, challenges related to mutual understanding and a lack of inclusive environments can often lead to autistic teens feeling excluded. In order to assess the impact of naturalistic interventions on interpersonal relationships, we conducted an experimental test utilizing Dialogic Reading for Comprehension (LuDiCa) in online reading circles with groups comprising both autistic and neurotypical adolescents. Our focus was on exploring its relevance for enhancing social interaction, particularly in terms of conversational acts, sharing experiences, initiations, and questions. Five autistic and five neurotypical students between 11 and 15 years old from a public school in Brasilia, Federal District, participated. We paired groups A and B (made up of trios of teenagers) and groups C and D (made up of pairs) in a multiple baseline design per reading group, in which all groups went through the baseline conditions (BL), intervention (LuDiCa) and maintenance. LuDiCa increased the frequency of conversational acts of both autistic participants and neurotypical peers. In addition, the intervention favored initiations, questions, and sharing experiences, through the shared activity of reading and talking about a work of fiction. Participants rated the intervention in relation to the platform, the book, the reading facilitator, and interaction with peers. We discuss the potential of the facilitator's role in favoring interactions and the potential of LuDiCa as a joint activity for the engagement of adolescents. We also include suggestions for future research focused on the online context and discuss some limitations of the LuDiCa intervention. In summary, our study offers initial experimental evidence demonstrating the positive impact of LuDiCa on social interaction behaviors among both autistic and neurotypical adolescents within an inclusive setting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica / Psychology: Research and Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica / Psychology: Research and Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-023-00283-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica / Psychology: Research and Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-023-00283-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在当今世界,人际关系在青少年的生活中扮演着重要角色。然而,与相互理解相关的挑战和包容性环境的缺乏往往会导致自闭症青少年感到被排斥。为了评估自然主义干预对人际关系的影响,我们利用在线阅读圈中的 "对话式阅读理解"(LuDiCa)进行了一项实验测试,测试对象包括自闭症青少年和神经畸形青少年。我们的重点是探索其在增强社会互动方面的相关性,尤其是在对话行为、经验分享、发起和提问方面。来自联邦区巴西利亚一所公立学校的五名 11 至 15 岁自闭症学生和五名神经畸形学生参加了此次研究。我们将 A 组和 B 组(由三对青少年组成)以及 C 组和 D 组(由两对青少年组成)配对,每个阅读小组采用多重基线设计,所有小组都经历了基线条件(BL)、干预(LuDiCa)和维持。LuDiCa 增加了自闭症参与者和神经典型同伴的对话行为频率。此外,通过阅读和谈论小说作品这一共同活动,干预措施有利于发起话题、提出问题和分享经验。参与者就平台、书籍、阅读促进者以及与同伴的互动等方面对干预措施进行了评价。我们讨论了主持人在促进互动方面的潜在作用,以及 LuDiCa 作为青少年共同参与活动的潜力。此外,我们还对未来的在线研究提出了建议,并讨论了 LuDiCa 干预的一些局限性。总之,我们的研究提供了初步的实验证据,证明 LuDiCa 在包容性环境中对自闭症青少年和神经畸形青少年的社交互动行为产生了积极影响。
Effects of dialogic reading for comprehension (LuDiCa) on the social interaction of autistic adolescents and their peers
In today’s contemporary world, relationships take a prominent role in the lives of adolescents. However, challenges related to mutual understanding and a lack of inclusive environments can often lead to autistic teens feeling excluded. In order to assess the impact of naturalistic interventions on interpersonal relationships, we conducted an experimental test utilizing Dialogic Reading for Comprehension (LuDiCa) in online reading circles with groups comprising both autistic and neurotypical adolescents. Our focus was on exploring its relevance for enhancing social interaction, particularly in terms of conversational acts, sharing experiences, initiations, and questions. Five autistic and five neurotypical students between 11 and 15 years old from a public school in Brasilia, Federal District, participated. We paired groups A and B (made up of trios of teenagers) and groups C and D (made up of pairs) in a multiple baseline design per reading group, in which all groups went through the baseline conditions (BL), intervention (LuDiCa) and maintenance. LuDiCa increased the frequency of conversational acts of both autistic participants and neurotypical peers. In addition, the intervention favored initiations, questions, and sharing experiences, through the shared activity of reading and talking about a work of fiction. Participants rated the intervention in relation to the platform, the book, the reading facilitator, and interaction with peers. We discuss the potential of the facilitator's role in favoring interactions and the potential of LuDiCa as a joint activity for the engagement of adolescents. We also include suggestions for future research focused on the online context and discuss some limitations of the LuDiCa intervention. In summary, our study offers initial experimental evidence demonstrating the positive impact of LuDiCa on social interaction behaviors among both autistic and neurotypical adolescents within an inclusive setting.