认知抑制在年轻人和老年人对视觉刺激做出自愿步进反应之前的影响

Eunyoung Kwag, Dominic Bachmann, Kyungwan Kim, Igor Komnik, Wiebren Zijlstra
{"title":"认知抑制在年轻人和老年人对视觉刺激做出自愿步进反应之前的影响","authors":"Eunyoung Kwag, Dominic Bachmann, Kyungwan Kim, Igor Komnik, Wiebren Zijlstra","doi":"10.1093/geronb/gbae006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives Age-related changes in executive functions, especially inhibitory control, correlate to decreased balance control and increased fall risk. However, only few studies focused on performance of tasks integrating balance and inhibitory control. This study aims to determine the effects of cognitive inhibition preceding the initiation of voluntary steps in young and older adults. Methods Performance of three stepping tasks (a Simon-, Flanker-, and a combined Simon-Flanker task (SFT)) were analyzed in 23 young adults and 43 older adults. Each task included congruent and incongruent trials in different step directions. Analyses focused on temporal aspects of step responses as identified by changes in Center of Pressure (CoP) and foot position. A three-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to evaluate ‘inhibition’, ‘age’, and ‘task’ effects. Results With large effect sizes, ‘inhibition’ as well as ‘age’ resulted in longer durations of an initial preparatory phase as well as the step response phase. The SFT showed the largest ‘task’ effects. Duration of CoP movement had the largest impact on total step execution in older adults. A significant interaction effect of ‘age*inhibition’ was found on duration of CoP movement, but not on CoP onset. Discussion Overall, our results demonstrate that cognitive inhibition has more impact in older adults, the longer duration of CoP movements in older adults may reflect an ineffective step preparation. Our examination of the duration of subsequent phases which comprise perceptual processing and conflict resolution, response initiation, and step execution sheds light on how cognitive inhibition affects voluntary stepping behavior in young and older adults.","PeriodicalId":501650,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology: Series B","volume":"135 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of cognitive inhibition preceding voluntary step responses to visual stimuli in young and older adults\",\"authors\":\"Eunyoung Kwag, Dominic Bachmann, Kyungwan Kim, Igor Komnik, Wiebren Zijlstra\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/geronb/gbae006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives Age-related changes in executive functions, especially inhibitory control, correlate to decreased balance control and increased fall risk. However, only few studies focused on performance of tasks integrating balance and inhibitory control. This study aims to determine the effects of cognitive inhibition preceding the initiation of voluntary steps in young and older adults. Methods Performance of three stepping tasks (a Simon-, Flanker-, and a combined Simon-Flanker task (SFT)) were analyzed in 23 young adults and 43 older adults. Each task included congruent and incongruent trials in different step directions. Analyses focused on temporal aspects of step responses as identified by changes in Center of Pressure (CoP) and foot position. A three-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to evaluate ‘inhibition’, ‘age’, and ‘task’ effects. Results With large effect sizes, ‘inhibition’ as well as ‘age’ resulted in longer durations of an initial preparatory phase as well as the step response phase. The SFT showed the largest ‘task’ effects. Duration of CoP movement had the largest impact on total step execution in older adults. A significant interaction effect of ‘age*inhibition’ was found on duration of CoP movement, but not on CoP onset. Discussion Overall, our results demonstrate that cognitive inhibition has more impact in older adults, the longer duration of CoP movements in older adults may reflect an ineffective step preparation. Our examination of the duration of subsequent phases which comprise perceptual processing and conflict resolution, response initiation, and step execution sheds light on how cognitive inhibition affects voluntary stepping behavior in young and older adults.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journals of Gerontology: Series B\",\"volume\":\"135 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journals of Gerontology: Series B\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbae006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journals of Gerontology: Series B","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbae006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标 与年龄有关的执行功能变化,尤其是抑制控制,与平衡控制能力下降和跌倒风险增加相关。然而,只有少数研究关注了平衡和抑制控制综合任务的表现。本研究旨在确定年轻人和老年人在开始自愿迈步之前的认知抑制所产生的影响。方法 分析了 23 名年轻人和 43 名老年人在三项迈步任务(Simon、Flanker 和 Simon-Flanker 组合任务 (SFT))中的表现。每个任务都包括不同步向的一致和不一致试验。分析的重点是通过压力中心(CoP)和脚的位置变化来确定步态反应的时间方面。采用三向重复测量方差分析来评估 "抑制"、"年龄 "和 "任务 "效应。结果 "抑制 "和 "年龄 "的效应大小较大,导致初始准备阶段和阶跃反应阶段的持续时间更长。SFT 显示了最大的 "任务 "效应。CoP运动持续时间对老年人总步法执行的影响最大。年龄*抑制 "对CoP运动持续时间有明显的交互作用,但对CoP的开始没有影响。讨论 总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,认知抑制对老年人的影响更大,老年人 CoP 动作持续时间更长可能反映出他们的步法准备工作没有做好。我们对包括感知处理和冲突解决、反应启动和步法执行在内的后续阶段的持续时间进行了研究,从而揭示了认知抑制如何影响年轻人和老年人的自主步法行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of cognitive inhibition preceding voluntary step responses to visual stimuli in young and older adults
Objectives Age-related changes in executive functions, especially inhibitory control, correlate to decreased balance control and increased fall risk. However, only few studies focused on performance of tasks integrating balance and inhibitory control. This study aims to determine the effects of cognitive inhibition preceding the initiation of voluntary steps in young and older adults. Methods Performance of three stepping tasks (a Simon-, Flanker-, and a combined Simon-Flanker task (SFT)) were analyzed in 23 young adults and 43 older adults. Each task included congruent and incongruent trials in different step directions. Analyses focused on temporal aspects of step responses as identified by changes in Center of Pressure (CoP) and foot position. A three-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to evaluate ‘inhibition’, ‘age’, and ‘task’ effects. Results With large effect sizes, ‘inhibition’ as well as ‘age’ resulted in longer durations of an initial preparatory phase as well as the step response phase. The SFT showed the largest ‘task’ effects. Duration of CoP movement had the largest impact on total step execution in older adults. A significant interaction effect of ‘age*inhibition’ was found on duration of CoP movement, but not on CoP onset. Discussion Overall, our results demonstrate that cognitive inhibition has more impact in older adults, the longer duration of CoP movements in older adults may reflect an ineffective step preparation. Our examination of the duration of subsequent phases which comprise perceptual processing and conflict resolution, response initiation, and step execution sheds light on how cognitive inhibition affects voluntary stepping behavior in young and older adults.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信