纵隔镜辅助经食管切除术(MATHE)的系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Yoshio Masuda , Eugene Kwong Fei Leong , Jimmy Bok Yan So , Asim Shabbir , Timothy Lam Jia Wei , Daryl Kai Ann Chia , Guowei Kim
{"title":"纵隔镜辅助经食管切除术(MATHE)的系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Yoshio Masuda ,&nbsp;Eugene Kwong Fei Leong ,&nbsp;Jimmy Bok Yan So ,&nbsp;Asim Shabbir ,&nbsp;Timothy Lam Jia Wei ,&nbsp;Daryl Kai Ann Chia ,&nbsp;Guowei Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) avoids thoracotomy but sacrifices mediastinal lymphadenectomy. Mediastinoscopy-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy (MATHE) allows for visualisation and en-bloc dissection of mediastinal lymph nodes while retaining the benefits of THE. However, given its novel inception, there is a paucity of literature. This study aimed to conduct the first meta-analysis to explore the efficacy of MATHE and clarify its role in the future of esophagectomy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Four databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) were searched from inception to May 1, 2023. Studies were included if they reported outcomes for patients with esophageal cancer who underwent MATHE. Meta-analyses of proportions and pooled means were performed for the outcomes of intraoperative blood loss, lymph node (LN) harvest, mean hospital length of stay (LOS), mean operative time, R0 resection, conversion rates, 30-day mortality rate, 5-year OS, and surgical complications (anastomotic leak, cardiovascular [CVS] and pulmonary complications, chyle leak and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy [RLN]). Sensitivity analyses were performed for outcomes with substantial statistical heterogeneity.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The search yielded 223 articles; 28 studies and 1128 patients were included in our analysis. Meta-analyses of proportions yielded proportion rates: 30-day mortality (0 %, 95 %CI 0-0), 5-year OS (60.5 %, 95 %CI 47.6–72.7), R0 resection (100 %, 95 %CI 99.3–100), conversion rate (0.1 %, 95 %CI 0–1.2). Among surgical complications, RLN palsy (14.6 %, 95 %CI 9.5–20.4) were most observed, followed by pulmonary complications (11.3 %, 95 %CI 7–16.2), anastomotic leak (9.7 %, 95 %CI 6.8–12.8), CVS complications (2.3 %, 95 %CI 0.9–4.1) and chyle leak (0.02 %, 95 %CI 0–0.8). Meta-analysis of pooled means yielded means: LN harvest (18.6, 95 %CI 14.3–22.9), intraoperative blood loss (247.1 ml, 95 %CI 173.6–320.6), hospital LOS (18.1 days, 95 %CI 14.4–21.8), and operative time (301.5 min, 95 %CI 238.4–364.6). There was moderate-to-high statistical heterogeneity. Findings were robust to sensitivity analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>MATHE is associated with encouraging post-operative mortality and complication rates, while allowing for radical mediastinal lymphadenectomy with reasonable lymph node harvest.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51185,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review and meta-analysis of mediastinoscopy-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy (MATHE)\",\"authors\":\"Yoshio Masuda ,&nbsp;Eugene Kwong Fei Leong ,&nbsp;Jimmy Bok Yan So ,&nbsp;Asim Shabbir ,&nbsp;Timothy Lam Jia Wei ,&nbsp;Daryl Kai Ann Chia ,&nbsp;Guowei Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) avoids thoracotomy but sacrifices mediastinal lymphadenectomy. Mediastinoscopy-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy (MATHE) allows for visualisation and en-bloc dissection of mediastinal lymph nodes while retaining the benefits of THE. However, given its novel inception, there is a paucity of literature. This study aimed to conduct the first meta-analysis to explore the efficacy of MATHE and clarify its role in the future of esophagectomy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Four databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) were searched from inception to May 1, 2023. Studies were included if they reported outcomes for patients with esophageal cancer who underwent MATHE. Meta-analyses of proportions and pooled means were performed for the outcomes of intraoperative blood loss, lymph node (LN) harvest, mean hospital length of stay (LOS), mean operative time, R0 resection, conversion rates, 30-day mortality rate, 5-year OS, and surgical complications (anastomotic leak, cardiovascular [CVS] and pulmonary complications, chyle leak and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy [RLN]). Sensitivity analyses were performed for outcomes with substantial statistical heterogeneity.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The search yielded 223 articles; 28 studies and 1128 patients were included in our analysis. Meta-analyses of proportions yielded proportion rates: 30-day mortality (0 %, 95 %CI 0-0), 5-year OS (60.5 %, 95 %CI 47.6–72.7), R0 resection (100 %, 95 %CI 99.3–100), conversion rate (0.1 %, 95 %CI 0–1.2). Among surgical complications, RLN palsy (14.6 %, 95 %CI 9.5–20.4) were most observed, followed by pulmonary complications (11.3 %, 95 %CI 7–16.2), anastomotic leak (9.7 %, 95 %CI 6.8–12.8), CVS complications (2.3 %, 95 %CI 0.9–4.1) and chyle leak (0.02 %, 95 %CI 0–0.8). Meta-analysis of pooled means yielded means: LN harvest (18.6, 95 %CI 14.3–22.9), intraoperative blood loss (247.1 ml, 95 %CI 173.6–320.6), hospital LOS (18.1 days, 95 %CI 14.4–21.8), and operative time (301.5 min, 95 %CI 238.4–364.6). There was moderate-to-high statistical heterogeneity. Findings were robust to sensitivity analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>MATHE is associated with encouraging post-operative mortality and complication rates, while allowing for radical mediastinal lymphadenectomy with reasonable lymph node harvest.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Oncology-Oxford\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Oncology-Oxford\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960740424000100\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960740424000100","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景经门食管切除术(THE)避免了开胸手术,但牺牲了纵隔淋巴结切除。纵隔镜辅助下经食管纵隔切除术(MATHE)可实现纵隔淋巴结的可视化和全切,同时保留了经食管纵隔切除术的优点。然而,由于该技术的新颖性,相关文献极少。本研究旨在进行首次荟萃分析,探讨 MATHE 的疗效,明确其在未来食管切除术中的作用。如果研究报告了接受 MATHE 的食管癌患者的治疗结果,则将其纳入研究。对术中失血、淋巴结(LN)摘除、平均住院时间(LOS)、平均手术时间、R0切除率、转化率、30天死亡率、5年OS和手术并发症(吻合口漏、心血管[CVS]和肺部并发症、糜烂性渗漏和喉返神经麻痹[RLN])的结果进行了比例和汇总平均值的元分析。我们对具有显著统计学异质性的结果进行了敏感性分析。对比例进行元分析后得出了比例率:30天死亡率(0%,95%CI 0-0)、5年OS(60.5%,95%CI 47.6-72.7)、R0切除率(100%,95%CI 99.3-100)、转换率(0.1%,95%CI 0-1.2)。在手术并发症中,RLN麻痹(14.6%,95%CI 9.5-20.4)最常见,其次是肺部并发症(11.3%,95%CI 7-16.2)、吻合口漏(9.7%,95%CI 6.8-12.8)、CVS并发症(2.3%,95%CI 0.9-4.1)和糜烂漏(0.02%,95%CI 0-0.8)。对汇集的平均值进行元分析得出的平均值为LN收获量(18.6,95%CI 14.3-22.9)、术中失血量(247.1毫升,95%CI 173.6-320.6)、住院时间(18.1天,95%CI 14.4-21.8)和手术时间(301.5分钟,95%CI 238.4-364.6)。统计异质性为中度到高度。结论MATHE的术后死亡率和并发症发生率较高,同时可以进行根治性纵隔淋巴结切除术,并能合理地摘取淋巴结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A systematic review and meta-analysis of mediastinoscopy-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy (MATHE)

Background

Transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) avoids thoracotomy but sacrifices mediastinal lymphadenectomy. Mediastinoscopy-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy (MATHE) allows for visualisation and en-bloc dissection of mediastinal lymph nodes while retaining the benefits of THE. However, given its novel inception, there is a paucity of literature. This study aimed to conduct the first meta-analysis to explore the efficacy of MATHE and clarify its role in the future of esophagectomy.

Methods

Four databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) were searched from inception to May 1, 2023. Studies were included if they reported outcomes for patients with esophageal cancer who underwent MATHE. Meta-analyses of proportions and pooled means were performed for the outcomes of intraoperative blood loss, lymph node (LN) harvest, mean hospital length of stay (LOS), mean operative time, R0 resection, conversion rates, 30-day mortality rate, 5-year OS, and surgical complications (anastomotic leak, cardiovascular [CVS] and pulmonary complications, chyle leak and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy [RLN]). Sensitivity analyses were performed for outcomes with substantial statistical heterogeneity.

Results

The search yielded 223 articles; 28 studies and 1128 patients were included in our analysis. Meta-analyses of proportions yielded proportion rates: 30-day mortality (0 %, 95 %CI 0-0), 5-year OS (60.5 %, 95 %CI 47.6–72.7), R0 resection (100 %, 95 %CI 99.3–100), conversion rate (0.1 %, 95 %CI 0–1.2). Among surgical complications, RLN palsy (14.6 %, 95 %CI 9.5–20.4) were most observed, followed by pulmonary complications (11.3 %, 95 %CI 7–16.2), anastomotic leak (9.7 %, 95 %CI 6.8–12.8), CVS complications (2.3 %, 95 %CI 0.9–4.1) and chyle leak (0.02 %, 95 %CI 0–0.8). Meta-analysis of pooled means yielded means: LN harvest (18.6, 95 %CI 14.3–22.9), intraoperative blood loss (247.1 ml, 95 %CI 173.6–320.6), hospital LOS (18.1 days, 95 %CI 14.4–21.8), and operative time (301.5 min, 95 %CI 238.4–364.6). There was moderate-to-high statistical heterogeneity. Findings were robust to sensitivity analyses.

Conclusion

MATHE is associated with encouraging post-operative mortality and complication rates, while allowing for radical mediastinal lymphadenectomy with reasonable lymph node harvest.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surgical Oncology-Oxford
Surgical Oncology-Oxford 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
169
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Surgical Oncology is a peer reviewed journal publishing review articles that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in surgical oncology and related fields of interest. Articles represent a spectrum of current technology in oncology research as well as those concerning clinical trials, surgical technique, methods of investigation and patient evaluation. Surgical Oncology publishes comprehensive Reviews that examine individual topics in considerable detail, in addition to editorials and commentaries which focus on selected papers. The journal also publishes special issues which explore topics of interest to surgical oncologists in great detail - outlining recent advancements and providing readers with the most up to date information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信