开发和评估基于互联网和移动设备的干预措施,为住院康复后重返工作岗位制定个性化计划--随机对照试验研究方案

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Adina Kreis , Anna Gomes , Angeliki Tsiouris , Manfred E. Beutel , Christian Ruckes , Ingo Dahn , Annika Schiller , Guido Loy , Hiltrud Zajac , Gregor Kosmuetzky , Patrick Ziser , Eckard Sträßner , Vera Schneider , Thomas Wilde , Martin Leber , Hannah Schäfer , Rebecca Kilian , Rüdiger Zwerenz
{"title":"开发和评估基于互联网和移动设备的干预措施,为住院康复后重返工作岗位制定个性化计划--随机对照试验研究方案","authors":"Adina Kreis ,&nbsp;Anna Gomes ,&nbsp;Angeliki Tsiouris ,&nbsp;Manfred E. Beutel ,&nbsp;Christian Ruckes ,&nbsp;Ingo Dahn ,&nbsp;Annika Schiller ,&nbsp;Guido Loy ,&nbsp;Hiltrud Zajac ,&nbsp;Gregor Kosmuetzky ,&nbsp;Patrick Ziser ,&nbsp;Eckard Sträßner ,&nbsp;Vera Schneider ,&nbsp;Thomas Wilde ,&nbsp;Martin Leber ,&nbsp;Hannah Schäfer ,&nbsp;Rebecca Kilian ,&nbsp;Rüdiger Zwerenz","doi":"10.1016/j.invent.2024.100721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Following discharge, it is crucial for patients to transfer intentions and action plans from inpatient rehabilitation into everyday life. This ensures their reintegration into social and working life and prevents economic costs due to sick leave or reduced earning capacity pension. However, most established aftercare programs do not specifically address occupational problems or challenges during occupational measures such as graded return to work. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the low-threshold online self-help intervention <em>marena</em> (Meine Arbeitsbezogene Reha-Nachsorge - My Work-related Rehabilitation Aftercare) to support return to work.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A two-arm randomized-controlled-trial (RCT) will be conducted. A total of <em>N</em> = 400 rehabilitation inpatients across different indication areas (psychosomatic, orthopedic, or cardiologic) aged 18 to 65 years with a planned return to work after medical rehabilitation, have a heightened social-medical risk and private internet access and are insured with the German Pension insurance or statutory health insurance, will be recruited in four medical and psychosomatic clinics in Germany. Participants will be allocated to either the intervention (IG) or the control group (CG). In a stepped-care model, participants of the IG will receive access to the non-guided internet- and mobile-based intervention <em>marena</em> (IG subgroup 1) or <em>marena</em> in combination with <em>GSA-Online plus</em> (IG subgroup 2), a guided psychodynamic internet-based intervention that has proven effective in two trials regarding occupational and health objectives. Based on a priori defined indication criteria, clinic staff will recommend either IG subgroup 1 or IG subgroup 2. The CG will receive optimized treatment as usual with access to a survey feature within <em>marena</em>. The primary outcome will be work status after 6 months (T2) and 12 months (T4). The endpoint at 12 months (T4) after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation will be considered as secondary endpoint. Work status is defined as positive if the participant is working and has ≤ 6 weeks of sick leave at T2 and ≤ 12 weeks of sick leave at T4. Secondary outcomes include successful completion of graded return to work, successful application for benefits for participation in working life, current work ability, social-medical risk, subjective prognosis of future employment, quality of life, somatic symptoms, coping, social support, depression, anxiety, and psychosocial stress.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>This study will contribute to the evidence concerning efficacy of online aftercare interventions. If proven efficacious, <em>marena</em> could provide an individualized and adaptable self-help approach to promote return to work following inpatient rehabilitation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48615,"journal":{"name":"Internet Interventions-The Application of Information Technology in Mental and Behavioural Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214782924000149/pdfft?md5=1f1ae87e9dd2dc934e3ff76b29ff1e0e&pid=1-s2.0-S2214782924000149-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and evaluation of an internet- and mobile-based intervention for individualized return to work planning after inpatient rehabilitation - Study protocol for a randomized-controlled-trial\",\"authors\":\"Adina Kreis ,&nbsp;Anna Gomes ,&nbsp;Angeliki Tsiouris ,&nbsp;Manfred E. Beutel ,&nbsp;Christian Ruckes ,&nbsp;Ingo Dahn ,&nbsp;Annika Schiller ,&nbsp;Guido Loy ,&nbsp;Hiltrud Zajac ,&nbsp;Gregor Kosmuetzky ,&nbsp;Patrick Ziser ,&nbsp;Eckard Sträßner ,&nbsp;Vera Schneider ,&nbsp;Thomas Wilde ,&nbsp;Martin Leber ,&nbsp;Hannah Schäfer ,&nbsp;Rebecca Kilian ,&nbsp;Rüdiger Zwerenz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.invent.2024.100721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Following discharge, it is crucial for patients to transfer intentions and action plans from inpatient rehabilitation into everyday life. This ensures their reintegration into social and working life and prevents economic costs due to sick leave or reduced earning capacity pension. However, most established aftercare programs do not specifically address occupational problems or challenges during occupational measures such as graded return to work. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the low-threshold online self-help intervention <em>marena</em> (Meine Arbeitsbezogene Reha-Nachsorge - My Work-related Rehabilitation Aftercare) to support return to work.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A two-arm randomized-controlled-trial (RCT) will be conducted. A total of <em>N</em> = 400 rehabilitation inpatients across different indication areas (psychosomatic, orthopedic, or cardiologic) aged 18 to 65 years with a planned return to work after medical rehabilitation, have a heightened social-medical risk and private internet access and are insured with the German Pension insurance or statutory health insurance, will be recruited in four medical and psychosomatic clinics in Germany. Participants will be allocated to either the intervention (IG) or the control group (CG). In a stepped-care model, participants of the IG will receive access to the non-guided internet- and mobile-based intervention <em>marena</em> (IG subgroup 1) or <em>marena</em> in combination with <em>GSA-Online plus</em> (IG subgroup 2), a guided psychodynamic internet-based intervention that has proven effective in two trials regarding occupational and health objectives. Based on a priori defined indication criteria, clinic staff will recommend either IG subgroup 1 or IG subgroup 2. The CG will receive optimized treatment as usual with access to a survey feature within <em>marena</em>. The primary outcome will be work status after 6 months (T2) and 12 months (T4). The endpoint at 12 months (T4) after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation will be considered as secondary endpoint. Work status is defined as positive if the participant is working and has ≤ 6 weeks of sick leave at T2 and ≤ 12 weeks of sick leave at T4. Secondary outcomes include successful completion of graded return to work, successful application for benefits for participation in working life, current work ability, social-medical risk, subjective prognosis of future employment, quality of life, somatic symptoms, coping, social support, depression, anxiety, and psychosocial stress.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>This study will contribute to the evidence concerning efficacy of online aftercare interventions. If proven efficacious, <em>marena</em> could provide an individualized and adaptable self-help approach to promote return to work following inpatient rehabilitation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internet Interventions-The Application of Information Technology in Mental and Behavioural Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214782924000149/pdfft?md5=1f1ae87e9dd2dc934e3ff76b29ff1e0e&pid=1-s2.0-S2214782924000149-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internet Interventions-The Application of Information Technology in Mental and Behavioural Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214782924000149\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Interventions-The Application of Information Technology in Mental and Behavioural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214782924000149","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景病人出院后,将住院康复的意图和行动计划转移到日常生活中至关重要。这可以确保他们重新融入社会和工作生活,并避免因病假或收入能力下降而导致的经济损失。然而,大多数既定的术后护理计划并没有专门针对职业问题或职业措施(如分级重返工作岗位)期间的挑战。本研究旨在评估低门槛在线自助干预marena(Meine Arbeitsbezogene Reha-Nachsorge - My Work-related Rehabilitation Aftercare)在支持重返工作岗位方面的功效。我们将在德国的四家医疗和心身疾病诊所招募 N = 400 名不同适应症(心身疾病、骨科或心内科)的康复住院病人,他们的年龄在 18 岁至 65 岁之间,计划在医疗康复后重返工作岗位,具有较高的社会医疗风险,可使用私人互联网,并参加了德国养老保险或法定医疗保险。参与者将被分配到干预组(IG)或对照组(CG)。在阶梯式护理模式中,IG 组的参与者将接受非指导性的基于互联网和移动设备的干预措施 marena(IG 子组 1)或 marena 与 GSA-Online plus(IG 子组 2)相结合的干预措施,后者是一种基于互联网的指导性心理动力学干预措施。根据事先确定的适应症标准,医务人员将推荐 IG 分组 1 或 IG 分组 2。主要结果是 6 个月(T2)和 12 个月(T4)后的工作状态。住院康复出院后 12 个月(T4)的终点将被视为次要终点。如果参与者有工作,并且在T2时病假少于6周,在T4时病假少于12周,则工作状态被定义为阳性。次要结果包括成功完成分级重返工作、成功申请参与工作生活的福利、当前工作能力、社会医疗风险、未来就业的主观预后、生活质量、躯体症状、应对能力、社会支持、抑郁、焦虑和社会心理压力。如果被证明有效,marena 可以提供一种个性化和适应性强的自助方法,促进住院康复后重返工作岗位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and evaluation of an internet- and mobile-based intervention for individualized return to work planning after inpatient rehabilitation - Study protocol for a randomized-controlled-trial

Background

Following discharge, it is crucial for patients to transfer intentions and action plans from inpatient rehabilitation into everyday life. This ensures their reintegration into social and working life and prevents economic costs due to sick leave or reduced earning capacity pension. However, most established aftercare programs do not specifically address occupational problems or challenges during occupational measures such as graded return to work. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the low-threshold online self-help intervention marena (Meine Arbeitsbezogene Reha-Nachsorge - My Work-related Rehabilitation Aftercare) to support return to work.

Methods

A two-arm randomized-controlled-trial (RCT) will be conducted. A total of N = 400 rehabilitation inpatients across different indication areas (psychosomatic, orthopedic, or cardiologic) aged 18 to 65 years with a planned return to work after medical rehabilitation, have a heightened social-medical risk and private internet access and are insured with the German Pension insurance or statutory health insurance, will be recruited in four medical and psychosomatic clinics in Germany. Participants will be allocated to either the intervention (IG) or the control group (CG). In a stepped-care model, participants of the IG will receive access to the non-guided internet- and mobile-based intervention marena (IG subgroup 1) or marena in combination with GSA-Online plus (IG subgroup 2), a guided psychodynamic internet-based intervention that has proven effective in two trials regarding occupational and health objectives. Based on a priori defined indication criteria, clinic staff will recommend either IG subgroup 1 or IG subgroup 2. The CG will receive optimized treatment as usual with access to a survey feature within marena. The primary outcome will be work status after 6 months (T2) and 12 months (T4). The endpoint at 12 months (T4) after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation will be considered as secondary endpoint. Work status is defined as positive if the participant is working and has ≤ 6 weeks of sick leave at T2 and ≤ 12 weeks of sick leave at T4. Secondary outcomes include successful completion of graded return to work, successful application for benefits for participation in working life, current work ability, social-medical risk, subjective prognosis of future employment, quality of life, somatic symptoms, coping, social support, depression, anxiety, and psychosocial stress.

Discussion

This study will contribute to the evidence concerning efficacy of online aftercare interventions. If proven efficacious, marena could provide an individualized and adaptable self-help approach to promote return to work following inpatient rehabilitation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
9.30%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the European Society for Research on Internet Interventions (ESRII) and the International Society for Research on Internet Interventions (ISRII). The aim of Internet Interventions is to publish scientific, peer-reviewed, high-impact research on Internet interventions and related areas. Internet Interventions welcomes papers on the following subjects: • Intervention studies targeting the promotion of mental health and featuring the Internet and/or technologies using the Internet as an underlying technology, e.g. computers, smartphone devices, tablets, sensors • Implementation and dissemination of Internet interventions • Integration of Internet interventions into existing systems of care • Descriptions of development and deployment infrastructures • Internet intervention methodology and theory papers • Internet-based epidemiology • Descriptions of new Internet-based technologies and experiments with clinical applications • Economics of internet interventions (cost-effectiveness) • Health care policy and Internet interventions • The role of culture in Internet intervention • Internet psychometrics • Ethical issues pertaining to Internet interventions and measurements • Human-computer interaction and usability research with clinical implications • Systematic reviews and meta-analysis on Internet interventions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信