在法医分析中使用统计实验设计 (DoE):有针对性的审查

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Vítor Luiz Caleffo Piva Bigão , Bruno Ruiz Brandão da Costa , Jonas Joaquim Mangabeira da Silva , Bruno Spinosa De Martinis , Delia Rita Tapia-Blácido
{"title":"在法医分析中使用统计实验设计 (DoE):有针对性的审查","authors":"Vítor Luiz Caleffo Piva Bigão ,&nbsp;Bruno Ruiz Brandão da Costa ,&nbsp;Jonas Joaquim Mangabeira da Silva ,&nbsp;Bruno Spinosa De Martinis ,&nbsp;Delia Rita Tapia-Blácido","doi":"10.1016/j.forc.2024.100554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Forensic Analysis is strongly linked to Analytical Chemistry. Developing and optimizing methodologies to extract target substances from and to investigate the presence of analytes in bodily fluids is paramount, albeit a challenging task. In this scenario, the use of Statistical Design of Experiments (DoE) and Response Surface Methodology (RSM) tools in Forensic Analysis has increased over the last years. Therefore, understanding how these tools are being employed to identify, to determine, and to quantify toxicants in biological specimens has become relevant. This review shows two important findings from the forty reviewed papers: almost all the studies used DoE/RSM in the sample preparation step, but the chromatographic and detection phases of the analytical scheme were little explored. Additionally, the papers focused mainly on optimizing the analytical peak signals of the target compounds, suggesting that detectability was the major concern when multivariate techniques were applied to develop the method. We hope this review will encourage future researchers in this area to use more design and optimization tools in a global analytical method development scheme, so that fewer but efficient assays can be conducted, contributing to shortened analysis time and fewer experimentation requirements such as smaller amounts of sample and reagents.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":324,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Chemistry","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 100554"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468170924000067/pdfft?md5=041e6e5b285931525ce6e56790b73fd9&pid=1-s2.0-S2468170924000067-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of statistical design of experiments (DoE) in Forensic Analysis: A tailored review\",\"authors\":\"Vítor Luiz Caleffo Piva Bigão ,&nbsp;Bruno Ruiz Brandão da Costa ,&nbsp;Jonas Joaquim Mangabeira da Silva ,&nbsp;Bruno Spinosa De Martinis ,&nbsp;Delia Rita Tapia-Blácido\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.forc.2024.100554\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Forensic Analysis is strongly linked to Analytical Chemistry. Developing and optimizing methodologies to extract target substances from and to investigate the presence of analytes in bodily fluids is paramount, albeit a challenging task. In this scenario, the use of Statistical Design of Experiments (DoE) and Response Surface Methodology (RSM) tools in Forensic Analysis has increased over the last years. Therefore, understanding how these tools are being employed to identify, to determine, and to quantify toxicants in biological specimens has become relevant. This review shows two important findings from the forty reviewed papers: almost all the studies used DoE/RSM in the sample preparation step, but the chromatographic and detection phases of the analytical scheme were little explored. Additionally, the papers focused mainly on optimizing the analytical peak signals of the target compounds, suggesting that detectability was the major concern when multivariate techniques were applied to develop the method. We hope this review will encourage future researchers in this area to use more design and optimization tools in a global analytical method development scheme, so that fewer but efficient assays can be conducted, contributing to shortened analysis time and fewer experimentation requirements such as smaller amounts of sample and reagents.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forensic Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"37 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100554\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468170924000067/pdfft?md5=041e6e5b285931525ce6e56790b73fd9&pid=1-s2.0-S2468170924000067-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forensic Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468170924000067\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468170924000067","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

法医分析与分析化学密切相关。开发和优化从体液中提取目标物质和调查分析物存在的方法至关重要,尽管这是一项具有挑战性的任务。在这种情况下,统计实验设计 (DoE) 和响应面方法 (RSM) 工具在法医学分析中的使用在过去几年中有所增加。因此,了解如何使用这些工具来识别、确定和量化生物样本中的毒物已变得十分重要。本综述从 40 篇综述论文中得出了两个重要发现:几乎所有研究都在样品制备步骤中使用了 DoE/RSM,但对分析方案的色谱和检测阶段却鲜有探讨。此外,这些论文主要侧重于优化目标化合物的分析峰信号,这表明在应用多元技术开发方法时,可检测性是主要关注点。我们希望这篇综述能鼓励该领域未来的研究人员在全局分析方法开发方案中使用更多的设计和优化工具,这样就能进行更少但更有效的检测,从而缩短分析时间,减少实验要求,如更少的样品和试剂用量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Use of statistical design of experiments (DoE) in Forensic Analysis: A tailored review

Use of statistical design of experiments (DoE) in Forensic Analysis: A tailored review

Use of statistical design of experiments (DoE) in Forensic Analysis: A tailored review

Forensic Analysis is strongly linked to Analytical Chemistry. Developing and optimizing methodologies to extract target substances from and to investigate the presence of analytes in bodily fluids is paramount, albeit a challenging task. In this scenario, the use of Statistical Design of Experiments (DoE) and Response Surface Methodology (RSM) tools in Forensic Analysis has increased over the last years. Therefore, understanding how these tools are being employed to identify, to determine, and to quantify toxicants in biological specimens has become relevant. This review shows two important findings from the forty reviewed papers: almost all the studies used DoE/RSM in the sample preparation step, but the chromatographic and detection phases of the analytical scheme were little explored. Additionally, the papers focused mainly on optimizing the analytical peak signals of the target compounds, suggesting that detectability was the major concern when multivariate techniques were applied to develop the method. We hope this review will encourage future researchers in this area to use more design and optimization tools in a global analytical method development scheme, so that fewer but efficient assays can be conducted, contributing to shortened analysis time and fewer experimentation requirements such as smaller amounts of sample and reagents.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forensic Chemistry
Forensic Chemistry CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
14.80%
发文量
65
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Forensic Chemistry publishes high quality manuscripts focusing on the theory, research and application of any chemical science to forensic analysis. The scope of the journal includes fundamental advancements that result in a better understanding of the evidentiary significance derived from the physical and chemical analysis of materials. The scope of Forensic Chemistry will also include the application and or development of any molecular and atomic spectrochemical technique, electrochemical techniques, sensors, surface characterization techniques, mass spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance, chemometrics and statistics, and separation sciences (e.g. chromatography) that provide insight into the forensic analysis of materials. Evidential topics of interest to the journal include, but are not limited to, fingerprint analysis, drug analysis, ignitable liquid residue analysis, explosives detection and analysis, the characterization and comparison of trace evidence (glass, fibers, paints and polymers, tapes, soils and other materials), ink and paper analysis, gunshot residue analysis, synthetic pathways for drugs, toxicology and the analysis and chemistry associated with the components of fingermarks. The journal is particularly interested in receiving manuscripts that report advances in the forensic interpretation of chemical evidence. Technology Readiness Level: When submitting an article to Forensic Chemistry, all authors will be asked to self-assign a Technology Readiness Level (TRL) to their article. The purpose of the TRL system is to help readers understand the level of maturity of an idea or method, to help track the evolution of readiness of a given technique or method, and to help filter published articles by the expected ease of implementation in an operation setting within a crime lab.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信